What do you mean. Relative left or absolute left?Knowing as I do the leftward slant
You mean the kind of political reality where an ancient tribe of Neanderthals overtook some Cro-Magnon?to several of the most popular posters on this site I thought I would chuck out a small dose of political reality.
Oh joy.Canada once was known as a Liberal country at heart and the Liberal Party of Canada was known as "the natural ruling party".
No more.
The Liberal Party of Canada is now a shattered has been.
Change is a coming.
He's just a f-ckin snark-spirited Albertan. You'd have to have grown up there to know what that means.PM Harper is a strategist and an incrementalist by nature.
Meaning what? A society where people take care of each other and you can't stand that because you know that if everyone knew as much about you as you know about yourself you would never take care of yourself?It took multiple Liberal majorities to slowly and thoroughly convert Canada's political, judicial, legal, military and civil services to a leftward orientation.
Leading back to what? Tyranny? Gee that sounds like a lot of work.It will in turn take a long time and a lot of hard work to reverse that course.
I bet if asked you would not be able to say what you mean in terms of your social vision the difference between "blatantly liberal" versus "steady-eddy".Here is how it starts:
The blatantly Liberal Govenor General's Clarkson and Michaelle Jean have been replaced by a Conservative steady-eddy realist David Johnston.
.A military for the purpose of self defense is kinda leftish. But a military for aggression in foreign lands is right wing. Since the military is run and financed by government, it is a socialist as the postal service or any civil service.
Only fringe group commies said that. If I recall, Stalin and Lenin were both right wing dictators with no semblance of socialism in their veins. They were both more fascist than socialist. Canadian commies were just nuts.
Let me know when the military becomes privatized. Until then it's more socialistic in principle.
Sorry to shatter your dreams.
Better check your math. Just in case you did not notice 60% of Canadians voted left of centre; just as they have done for the last four decades. Also review the numerous left wing policies that were part of the Conservative platform. Certainly, 40% of Canadians gave the Conservatives their support, but it is a Conservative Party that no one from the 1980s would recognize. Any attempt by the new government to turn back the clock is likely to be met with considerable hostility; even from voters who supported the party.
Is this what the people of Tibet think?a military for aggression in foreign lands is right wing.
Is this what the people of Tibet think?
Harper grew up in Toronto so how does he know what a f-ckin snark-spirited Albertan would be thinking?He's just a f-ckin snark-spirited Albertan. You'd have to have grown up there to know what that means.
Harper grew up in Toronto so how does he know what a f-ckin snark-spirited Albertan would be thinking?
.
well, I guess we will see some of that because the new government will be turning back the clock on some failed Liberal legislation related to the gun registry. Personally, I don't think voters care much about the gun registry as indicated by the lack of outrage when the registry was put in, and it will be indicated by the lack of outrage when the registry is removed.
A new political sunrise? I'd have said it was a sunset, the beginning of a dark time. I've just been reading about the issues around the Wheat Board and what the Cons are up to on that file. You think you've seen contempt of Parliament and the democratic process, and plain old ignorance of history, from these guys before? Just wait...
socialist hardline monopolies like the CWB don't fit into a global economy. I just don't see how you guys can support it, unless you refuse to give it more than a few minutes thought while suggesting that canadian farmers are somehow inferior to the rest of the world.
isn't the general mantra "well if we all stand together, we can get a better overal price than we can in a free market"?
geez, guys, this isn't 1943 anymore. competition and growth is what keeps an industry strong and viable. if you cap the farmer's income potential or - heaven forbid - subsidize them, you just create an industry that exists further and further outside of reality.
Furthermore, the CWB's own surveys indicate that there is only about a 30% support for them by farmers.
You speak of democracy. well the farmers need their democracatic say in their businesses.
Let them vote for the CWB to become an optional program.......yes, this doesn't have to be an all or nothing debate. A CWB that operates in a free market can still exist, and if it is truly creating value for farmers, we will find a high percentage opting in.
He probably got beat up by the native kids consistantly. It explains a lot.he lived in Lethbride Alberta for a while. Not exactly the kind of place that is known for the stereotypical snark spirited albertan.
Harper's version of honest transparency will come home to bite him on the arse. Canadians aren't that stupid....
The problem with allowing farmers to opt out of the Canadian Wheat Board is that it really makes the organization irrelevant. If farmers can jump from the organization any time they please in order to take advantage of higher demand for their product then there is really is no logical reason for any farmer to remain a member. The problem with that is that the desire to operate outside the CWB's monopoly only occurs when world demand for grain is high. When demand drops members are quite happy to be a part of the CWB which really is a case of wanting to eat your cake and have it too.
It is interesting to note that the Americans have long criticized the CWB for giving Canada an unfair advantage when global demand for grain is low. In addition, leaving the CWB would place Canadian grain farmers at the mercy of giant international agricultural oligopolies which could care less about the interests of the Canadian farmer.
Finally, grain production is already heavily subsidized in other nations. The EU has huge agricultural subsidies on almost all products, and the USA and Japan regularly shovel billions into the pockets of farmers. Unless the rest of the world is prepared to play by the same free market rules opponents of the CWB advocate Canadian farmers might find themselves in a real dog eat dog market with nothing to fall back on if world grain prices decline.
Blood? Sweat? Tears?You are so right!!!! Canadians aren't that stupid........and that is why finally they voted for a majority Conservative government.
What on Earth is so wrong with allowing a Farmer who's blood sweat and tears are put into growing and reaping his crops and then allowing him to decide if he should be a part of the CWB or sell HIS OWN crops on the FREE market at HIS OWN CHOICE????
And why oh why is that only CERTAIN provinces have to adhere to this farsical communist nonsense????
The problem with allowing farmers to opt out of the Canadian Wheat Board is that it really makes the organization irrelevant. If farmers can jump from the organization any time they please in order to take advantage of higher demand for their product then there is really is no logical reason for any farmer to remain a member. The problem with that is that the desire to operate outside the CWB's monopoly only occurs when world demand for grain is high. When demand drops members are quite happy to be a part of the CWB which really is a case of wanting to eat your cake and have it too.
It is interesting to note that the Americans have long criticized the CWB for giving Canada an unfair advantage when global demand for grain is low. In addition, leaving the CWB would place Canadian grain farmers at the mercy of giant international agricultural oligopolies which could care less about the interests of the Canadian farmer.
Finally, grain production is already heavily subsidized in other nations. The EU has huge agricultural subsidies on almost all products, and the USA and Japan regularly shovel billions into the pockets of farmers. Unless the rest of the world is prepared to play by the same free market rules opponents of the CWB advocate Canadian farmers might find themselves in a real dog eat dog market with nothing to fall back on if world grain prices decline.
The killing of the CWB is going to kill any producer under a section of land which will mean he'll probably sell out or lease to a larger producer who can afford the shipping costs and market their product easier because of volume.