9.5 million litres of toxic waste spills in Northern Alberta

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,365
14,290
113
Low Earth Orbit
Another one of you who bought into the "keepers of the earth" crap? I supposed Batman and Santa Claus are real too? I see middle of nowhere propane huffers just as often as those who sell their sisters on my street for crack.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Much of the water below the aquifers are briny as is... And yes, they do surface from time to time due to natural events and I have yet to see some form of biblical sterilization of the land for generations to come.

The notion that the earth is 'salted' and therefore sterile for whatever amount of time is nothing but sensationalist and one of the mitigating factors has to do with the bacterial action detailed in those links and tens of thousands of others.

Gaia will heal here, no different than when someone does their own oil change and pours the waste oil on the grass or uses a septic field in a community.

9.5 million litres. No different? lol!

I think you don't really understand what produced water is. Hubby (a completions expert in the oil patch), and my dad (a productions expert), were talking about this spill, and they were mortified. Produced water is not a simple 'oh well, the earth does it too', and 9.5 million litres is a MASSIVE spill, not an oil change.

The damage has yet to be established, so trying to brush it off as nothing is irrational.

Another one of you who bought into the "keepers of the earth" crap? I supposed Batman and Santa Claus are real too? I see middle of nowhere propane huffers just as often as those who sell their sisters on my street for crack.

Bigoted crap.

There are alcoholics, druggies, and *****s, in every race. They are not ALL alcoholics, druggies, and *****s, just because that's who you see.

The fact that there are natives you don't like, doesn't mean the Dene have no valid complaint, it doesn't mean Apache didn't spill 9.5 million litres of produced water as they've admitted, and it doesn't mean there isn't environmental damage. If a white guy had reported this and bitched about his fields being ruined, I doubt you'd be singing this same tune.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,365
14,290
113
Low Earth Orbit
There are alcoholics, druggies, and *****s, in every race. They are not ALL
alcoholics, druggies, and *****s, just because that's who you see.
Ha! You get riled up over these half truths but by into the keepers of the earth crap hook, line and sphincter? WTG!
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Ha! You get riled up over these half truths but by into the keepers of the earth crap hook, line and sphincter? WTG!

Oh do I now? Or do I simply know the reservations of which you're making such assertions?

I don't think the First Nations are 'keepers of the earth'. But I do know that the Dene in that area are much more isolated than most bands, and still rely heavily on hunting, fishing, and trapping, to survive.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
9.5 million litres. No different? lol!

I think you don't really understand what produced water is. Hubby (a completions expert in the oil patch), and my dad (a productions expert), were talking about this spill, and they were mortified. Produced water is not a simple 'oh well, the earth does it too', and 9.5 million litres is a MASSIVE spill, not an oil change.

I know exactly what produced water is, and it isn't 'clean' by any stretch of the imagination.... And yes, 9.5 MM litres or 34,000 bbls is a helluva lot of oil.

But this drama about 'the salted and scorched Earth' is way over the top. Just the same way that plants grow in the Hawaiian Islands at the base of the volcanoes where the lava flowed freely, or the lands around the oil sands where the bitumen is at surface but still supports all kinds of life or the thousands of hectares of forest that burn each and every year in Canada.

PS - Multiply the number of cars on the roads in NorAm by the number that leak oil and tranny fluid in addition to the number of people that spread it on the grass, along with the fluids that leak from accidents on a daily basis and you'll probably have a MASSIVE spill as well over a bigger area EACH AND EVERY DAY.

... And yet, here we are, no salted Earth, humanity moving along and the planet hasn't exploded yet.



But I do know that the Dene in that area are much more isolated than most bands, and still rely heavily on hunting, fishing, and trapping, to survive.

... With high-powered rifles, snow mobiles, quads, 1/2 ton trucks with 10,000 candle lights on the roof to stun the deer.

I'm guessing that they'll be able to still hunt and trap without too much difficulty
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
So let's pile more pollution on and ignore it, hey?

No, sorry, Apache needs to be accountable for cleaning up its mess, and preventing it in the future. We can't just shrug this stuff off. It's not necessary. It's not 'inevitable', and it's not something we should just ignore.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
So let's pile more pollution on and ignore it, hey?

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.

But since we're on the topic, maybe we ought to outlaw the use of anything that pollutes - don't forget that burning wood is pretty nasty, so get some sweaters and blankets together 'cause winter is only 5 months away!

No, sorry, Apache needs to be accountable for cleaning up its mess, and preventing it in the future. We can't just shrug this stuff off. It's not necessary. It's not 'inevitable', and it's not something we should just ignore.

You bet they are - just like I said... But what we don't need is over the top theatrics of doom 'n gloom.

It is in the best interests of Apache to prevent these events from happening both financially and politically.

You're under the impression that they don't care... They do, but for very different reasons than you
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
Sorry if I misread you, you seemed to be on the same 'bah, who cares' kick that petros was on.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Food is #1 Cliffy. Oil is what put an extra 4 Billion people on the planet because it gives the opportunity to grow more food. Without it, billions die.
Yeah. Yet, with all that convenience supplied by oil, we still can't keep all those people fed.
Make more people to need more resources. Kind of a stupid cycle, isn't it?

I'm always amused by the arguments when something like this happens because both sides get in their polarized little corners, doom cry and then something else grabs our attention and we forget all about the previous arguments.

As someone who grew up in an oil town and has spent his adult life working in the energy sector, I see validity on both sides of this one.

The producers and pipeline companies should have done more. The technology is out there for them to do more to monitor the condition of their lines but it might cost a couple thousand to buy and install it, so many project managers balk at the cost of something they don't understand and they won't be around to see function. The production operations personnel don't have the budgets that the construction groups do, and they have to prioritize what they spend money on... and usually they have other issues calling for attention too.

I had a boss who used to say "corrosion engineering is based on nothing happening" and he would go on to explain that this is why it is a hard sell to many engineering and operations VPs in the energy industry: many of them don't know if they are getting any return on investment until they stop spending the money and a failure and subsequent release occur. Then it becomes a big "oops" and they go into damage/spin control.
I agree. Short-sightedness, not being prepared, etc. Leads to a mess.

On the other side, the impact, even off the larger spills have more short term impact than anything else.
Ya think so? Well, I guess "short term" is relative. Twenty Years Later, Impacts of the Exxon Valdez Linger by Doug Struck: Yale Environment 360

They can be cleaned fairly quickly, and the producers do write cheques to make up for lost income etc. I remember 20-25 years or so ago, Amoco (before BP bought them) had a huge produced water (i.e. salt water) spill at Utikima Lake that killed off all the fish in the lake. There was a public outcry and Amoco had a big clean up, including paying commercial fishermen and aboriginal people who fished/trapped the area and had their livelihoods affected.
Yeah, money "fixes" everything, doesn't it? Well, maybe not everything.
5 years later, the lake was being fished and the area was back to normal.
Was it? Sorry, but there's loads more to the issue than simply restocking the lake, and planting a few bushes and trees.

In short, its not a good thing when these types of leaks occur, and often, with engineering and operations groups that don't live with their collective heads up their arses, they can be avoided. But they aren't as catastrophic as some people play them out to be,
Some people are like that.
and the ecosystems recover a lot quicker than many of us realize.
And ecosystems are quite a bit more complicated than many of us realize. Some aspects are quick to recover. Other aspects take many years.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Sorry if I misread you, you seemed to be on the same 'bah, who cares' kick that petros was on.

No apology necessary.

It is a very serious issue regardless if it's 1 or 100,00 bbls; particularly in muskeg country. Those pollutants will flow a long distance (on a PPM basis) at surface due to the permeability of the muskegy lands and no one wins when it happens.

That said, I will agree with Pete on the notion that a clear and objective assessment is needed, fines assessed, penalties imposed and most importantly, clean-up and remediation accomplished... But what will undermine this entire this process is turning this in an opportunity for a witch-hunt
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
That's not what I interpreted.
Not my problem.

It appeared to me that one of your points had to do with the active extraction vs natural means.
Part of it.
In the end, does that really matter? Here we have a trillion bbls world wide that are at (or damn near close) to surface with aquifers running through it (let alone surface run-off) that empty into the local environments (and global) and Gaia has been able to handle everything thrown at her... For tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of years
Yep. That slow steady leak is easier to deal with. Fast leaks like the Gulf spill, the Utikuma Lake, and Zama spills aren't slow and steady. If the planet could handle everything at the same speed the spills occur, then everything would be fine. It can't. Apparently, you can't grasp that. So like I said, I give up; I ran out of ways to explain it and have lost the ambition to try anymore. So we should just keep polluting. It'll all be fine.

You tell me, is this an issue of 'what' is in the eco system or 'when' it is in the eco system?
Yes. It's both.

Apparently the Dene are poised to starve to death in Zama Lake (I've been - the local stores are chalk-full of supplies) as they can't hunt
Oh, I doubt they'll starve. But you tell me, are processed meats just as good for human health as wild meats? Just as cheap to acquire?

Brine is the main component of what Apache spilled.
Yes, but the salt is quite alkaline. It ain't table salt.

Make all the noise you want as long as the noise is truthful and unbiased.

The "keepers of the land" is the biggest line of bullsh*t put forth by some of these people. The people who raped the forests of wildlife for 400 years to earn money kinda cancels any notion of that being a reality.
So means it's ok to pollute everything around them then, right?

Much of the water below the aquifers are briny as is... And yes, they do surface from time to time due to natural events and I have yet to see some form of biblical sterilization of the land for generations to come.

The notion that the earth is 'salted' and therefore sterile for whatever amount of time is nothing but sensationalist and one of the mitigating factors has to do with the bacterial action detailed in those links and tens of thousands of others.

Gaia will heal here,
In a few decades ....... or it will still be healing when the next spill comes about.
no different than when someone does their own oil change and pours the waste oil on the grass or uses a septic field in a community.
Yeah, the spills are nothing. So why even bother to keep them from happening? Why bother even trying to clean them up after they happen. Everything will go back to normal, eventually.

An example of short-term recover. The clearcut in the pic below took place 30 years ago.



Looks normal, right?
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Not my problem.

Great, I suppose that we both have that in common

Part of it.

Great... Tell me about the remainder then.

Yep. That slow steady leak is easier to deal with. Fast leaks like the Gulf spill, the Utikuma Lake, and Zama spills aren't slow and steady. If the planet could handle everything at the same speed the spills occur, then everything would be fine. It can't. Apparently, you can't grasp that. So like I said, I give up; I ran out of ways to explain it and have lost the ambition to try anymore. So we should just keep polluting. It'll all be fine.

Ya might want to think twice about using the Gulf spill as your benchmark - the vast oil slick that was to envelope the entire South/Gulf coast never came to be... In fact, looks like Gaia really out did herself on self-cleaning that spill.

Yes. It's both.

... And so much more

When and where are among so many moving parts it's barely recognizable in the entire equation.... By in large the reason that I'm getting such a kick out of all the little extra objections that come to pass... It leaked this much... It's worse 'cause it was a Tuesday... People won't be able to play lawn darts... The reception on my radio is poor... The beer in my fridge isn't as cold as it was before the spill.

Oh, I doubt they'll starve. But you tell me, are processed meats just as good for human health as wild meats? Just as cheap to acquire?

How many of the Dene folks live off of wild meat?

But if it will it make you feel better, I'll kick in a few extra bucks for gas so the range on their quads is extended the extra distance to get to the game.

Feel better now?
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Great, I suppose that we both have that in common



Great... Tell me about the remainder then.
Nah. Like I said, I give up.



Ya might want to think twice about using the Gulf spill as your benchmark - the vast oil slick that was to envelope the entire South/Gulf coast never came to be... In fact, looks like Gaia really out did herself on self-cleaning that spill.
Why would I think twice? The effects are still ongoing.

When and where are among so many moving parts it's barely recognizable in the entire equation.... By in large the reason that I'm getting such a kick out of all the little extra objections that come to pass... It leaked this much... It's worse 'cause it was a Tuesday... People won't be able to play lawn darts... The reception on my radio is poor... The beer in my fridge isn't as cold as it was before the spill.
Yes, I know you still don't get the concept.

How many of the Dene folks live off of wild meat?
Dunno, how many don't live off wild meat? We live about 8 kliks from 3 general stores, yet most of the meat we eat is wild. It is simply healthier and tastes loads better.

But if it will it make you feel better, I'll kick in a few extra bucks for gas so the range on their quads is extended the extra distance to get to the game.

Feel better now?
If that's what eases your conscience, go for it.