I think the picture is self explanatory. Harpo represents exploitation. The warrior: protecting the Earth Mother for 7 generations. You see big city Indians. I see something else.Between who?
That is the point. Oil has allowed an artificial boom in population that has never happened before. It is not sustainable and soon we will be looking at 10 billion. The die off will be even greater then. It is inevitable.
Much of the water below the aquifers are briny as is... And yes, they do surface from time to time due to natural events and I have yet to see some form of biblical sterilization of the land for generations to come.
The notion that the earth is 'salted' and therefore sterile for whatever amount of time is nothing but sensationalist and one of the mitigating factors has to do with the bacterial action detailed in those links and tens of thousands of others.
Gaia will heal here, no different than when someone does their own oil change and pours the waste oil on the grass or uses a septic field in a community.
Another one of you who bought into the "keepers of the earth" crap? I supposed Batman and Santa Claus are real too? I see middle of nowhere propane huffers just as often as those who sell their sisters on my street for crack.
Ha! You get riled up over these half truths but by into the keepers of the earth crap hook, line and sphincter? WTG!There are alcoholics, druggies, and *****s, in every race. They are not ALL
alcoholics, druggies, and *****s, just because that's who you see.
Ha! You get riled up over these half truths but by into the keepers of the earth crap hook, line and sphincter? WTG!
9.5 million litres. No different? lol!
I think you don't really understand what produced water is. Hubby (a completions expert in the oil patch), and my dad (a productions expert), were talking about this spill, and they were mortified. Produced water is not a simple 'oh well, the earth does it too', and 9.5 million litres is a MASSIVE spill, not an oil change.
But I do know that the Dene in that area are much more isolated than most bands, and still rely heavily on hunting, fishing, and trapping, to survive.
So let's pile more pollution on and ignore it, hey?
No, sorry, Apache needs to be accountable for cleaning up its mess, and preventing it in the future. We can't just shrug this stuff off. It's not necessary. It's not 'inevitable', and it's not something we should just ignore.
Yeah. Yet, with all that convenience supplied by oil, we still can't keep all those people fed.Food is #1 Cliffy. Oil is what put an extra 4 Billion people on the planet because it gives the opportunity to grow more food. Without it, billions die.
I agree. Short-sightedness, not being prepared, etc. Leads to a mess.I'm always amused by the arguments when something like this happens because both sides get in their polarized little corners, doom cry and then something else grabs our attention and we forget all about the previous arguments.
As someone who grew up in an oil town and has spent his adult life working in the energy sector, I see validity on both sides of this one.
The producers and pipeline companies should have done more. The technology is out there for them to do more to monitor the condition of their lines but it might cost a couple thousand to buy and install it, so many project managers balk at the cost of something they don't understand and they won't be around to see function. The production operations personnel don't have the budgets that the construction groups do, and they have to prioritize what they spend money on... and usually they have other issues calling for attention too.
I had a boss who used to say "corrosion engineering is based on nothing happening" and he would go on to explain that this is why it is a hard sell to many engineering and operations VPs in the energy industry: many of them don't know if they are getting any return on investment until they stop spending the money and a failure and subsequent release occur. Then it becomes a big "oops" and they go into damage/spin control.
Ya think so? Well, I guess "short term" is relative. Twenty Years Later, Impacts of the Exxon Valdez Linger by Doug Struck: Yale Environment 360On the other side, the impact, even off the larger spills have more short term impact than anything else.
Yeah, money "fixes" everything, doesn't it? Well, maybe not everything.They can be cleaned fairly quickly, and the producers do write cheques to make up for lost income etc. I remember 20-25 years or so ago, Amoco (before BP bought them) had a huge produced water (i.e. salt water) spill at Utikima Lake that killed off all the fish in the lake. There was a public outcry and Amoco had a big clean up, including paying commercial fishermen and aboriginal people who fished/trapped the area and had their livelihoods affected.
Was it? Sorry, but there's loads more to the issue than simply restocking the lake, and planting a few bushes and trees.5 years later, the lake was being fished and the area was back to normal.
Some people are like that.In short, its not a good thing when these types of leaks occur, and often, with engineering and operations groups that don't live with their collective heads up their arses, they can be avoided. But they aren't as catastrophic as some people play them out to be,
And ecosystems are quite a bit more complicated than many of us realize. Some aspects are quick to recover. Other aspects take many years.and the ecosystems recover a lot quicker than many of us realize.
Sorry if I misread you, you seemed to be on the same 'bah, who cares' kick that petros was on.
Not my problem.That's not what I interpreted.
Part of it.It appeared to me that one of your points had to do with the active extraction vs natural means.
Yep. That slow steady leak is easier to deal with. Fast leaks like the Gulf spill, the Utikuma Lake, and Zama spills aren't slow and steady. If the planet could handle everything at the same speed the spills occur, then everything would be fine. It can't. Apparently, you can't grasp that. So like I said, I give up; I ran out of ways to explain it and have lost the ambition to try anymore. So we should just keep polluting. It'll all be fine.In the end, does that really matter? Here we have a trillion bbls world wide that are at (or damn near close) to surface with aquifers running through it (let alone surface run-off) that empty into the local environments (and global) and Gaia has been able to handle everything thrown at her... For tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of years
Yes. It's both.You tell me, is this an issue of 'what' is in the eco system or 'when' it is in the eco system?
Oh, I doubt they'll starve. But you tell me, are processed meats just as good for human health as wild meats? Just as cheap to acquire?Apparently the Dene are poised to starve to death in Zama Lake (I've been - the local stores are chalk-full of supplies) as they can't hunt
Yes, but the salt is quite alkaline. It ain't table salt.Brine is the main component of what Apache spilled.
So means it's ok to pollute everything around them then, right?Make all the noise you want as long as the noise is truthful and unbiased.
The "keepers of the land" is the biggest line of bullsh*t put forth by some of these people. The people who raped the forests of wildlife for 400 years to earn money kinda cancels any notion of that being a reality.
In a few decades ....... or it will still be healing when the next spill comes about.Much of the water below the aquifers are briny as is... And yes, they do surface from time to time due to natural events and I have yet to see some form of biblical sterilization of the land for generations to come.
The notion that the earth is 'salted' and therefore sterile for whatever amount of time is nothing but sensationalist and one of the mitigating factors has to do with the bacterial action detailed in those links and tens of thousands of others.
Gaia will heal here,
Yeah, the spills are nothing. So why even bother to keep them from happening? Why bother even trying to clean them up after they happen. Everything will go back to normal, eventually.no different than when someone does their own oil change and pours the waste oil on the grass or uses a septic field in a community.
Not my problem.
Part of it.
Yep. That slow steady leak is easier to deal with. Fast leaks like the Gulf spill, the Utikuma Lake, and Zama spills aren't slow and steady. If the planet could handle everything at the same speed the spills occur, then everything would be fine. It can't. Apparently, you can't grasp that. So like I said, I give up; I ran out of ways to explain it and have lost the ambition to try anymore. So we should just keep polluting. It'll all be fine.
Yes. It's both.
Oh, I doubt they'll starve. But you tell me, are processed meats just as good for human health as wild meats? Just as cheap to acquire?
Nah. Like I said, I give up.Great, I suppose that we both have that in common
Great... Tell me about the remainder then.
Why would I think twice? The effects are still ongoing.Ya might want to think twice about using the Gulf spill as your benchmark - the vast oil slick that was to envelope the entire South/Gulf coast never came to be... In fact, looks like Gaia really out did herself on self-cleaning that spill.
Yes, I know you still don't get the concept.When and where are among so many moving parts it's barely recognizable in the entire equation.... By in large the reason that I'm getting such a kick out of all the little extra objections that come to pass... It leaked this much... It's worse 'cause it was a Tuesday... People won't be able to play lawn darts... The reception on my radio is poor... The beer in my fridge isn't as cold as it was before the spill.
Dunno, how many don't live off wild meat? We live about 8 kliks from 3 general stores, yet most of the meat we eat is wild. It is simply healthier and tastes loads better.How many of the Dene folks live off of wild meat?
If that's what eases your conscience, go for it.But if it will it make you feel better, I'll kick in a few extra bucks for gas so the range on their quads is extended the extra distance to get to the game.
Feel better now?
How many of the Dene folks live off of wild meat?
Knowledge of the subject matter and analysis of historical events is the only proof that you need
...... for what?Knowledge of the subject matter and analysis of historical events is the only proof that you need
Lots of them rely heavily on wild meat. even the three treaty 8 members I know from Edmonton go home to help fill freezers in the fall.
Lol! Like the 'knowledge' of the Dene Tha from that area?