9-11-ten yrs Later

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
For US, Is War the New Normal?



Is there any doubt???


For US, Is War the New Normal? -- News from Antiwar.com


Not really all that new either.........as the US war machine has been active in one place or another almost continuously since the beginning a few hundred years ago. The times when the US was not at war somewhere or with someone are short and infrequent.


who is US? you have crabs?

that's all you have to say? a thumbs down?


You really should be more careful as to who you piss off.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,204
14,247
113
Low Earth Orbit

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Pssssst. Being Pro-Peace will get you much much further than being Anti-War.

what is so sacrosanct about war that to be against slaughter and the horrors that wars entail is to be practically shunned. Being against wars and how casually they are started now IS being for peace. Not that it will ever be a priority for those that profit from human slaughter more than they do from times of peace,

Petros........your heart is in the right place and I totally respect you for that.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
what is so sacrosanct about war that to be against slaughter and the horrors that wars entail is to be practically shunned. Being against wars and how casually they are started now IS being for peace. Not that it will ever be a priority for those that profit from human slaughter more than they do from times of peace,

Petros........your heart is in the right place and I totally respect you for that.


You're not anti war, you're anti u.s. The lies coming out of your pie hole are getting beyond ridiculous.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Building 7 has always bothered me. Maybe you conspiracy theorists could explain it.

If WTC 1 and 2 were controlled demolitions and the airliners meant to make it look like a terrorist attack, why didn't they also fly a plane into WTC 7? The official explanation is that debris from the attacks falling on WTC 7 caused it to collapsed, and the Truthers point to it not being hit by a plane as evidence that it was a controlled demolition. If they masterminded this grand deception why the huge oversight of WTC 7? Seems a bit of a gamble to rely on the randomness of flaming debris to cover up the controlled demolition. What if nothing fell on building 7? How would they have explained it collapsing?

Oh sure, the kind of criminal genius required to pull off the attacks wasn't enough to get past the observations of a few internet shut ins, but while they were secretly funnelling their Jew gold to the Nazi moonbase, you think they might have stopped to give building 7 a cover that didn't rely on chance. Or was it all a by-product of their evil genius hubris?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Building 7 has always bothered me. Maybe you conspiracy theorists could explain it.

If WTC 1 and 2 were controlled demolitions and the airliners meant to make it look like a terrorist attack, why didn't they also fly a plane into WTC 7? The official explanation is that debris from the attacks falling on WTC 7 caused it to collapsed, and the Truthers point to it not being hit by a plane as evidence that it was a controlled demolition. If they masterminded this grand deception why the huge oversight of WTC 7? Seems a bit of a gamble to rely on the randomness of flaming debris to cover up the controlled demolition. What if nothing fell on building 7? How would they have explained it collapsing?

Oh sure, the kind of criminal genius required to pull off the attacks wasn't enough to get past the observations of a few internet shut ins, but while they were secretly funnelling their Jew gold to the Nazi moonbase, you think they might have stopped to give building 7 a cover that didn't rely on chance. Or was it all a by-product of their evil genius hubris?

I'd give you six greenies for that if I could........or maybe 666. :)
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You have all made me see the light finally thanks everyone.
The USA is so innocent and pure.
Who said that?

I'm learning from CDNBEAR
Apparently not well enough, work on it.

I don't think it's showing yet! Are you giving him lots of homework, Bear? :lol:
Apparently not.

GAU 8 or "Vulcan" as you call it will rip a tank to shreds but not an airliner?
Two totally different weapons pumpkin.

Vulcan, 20mm. Used on supersonic platforms.
GAU 8, 30mm. Used almost exclusively on the A 10.

Are you saying A 10's were scrambled to take down Flight 93?
Are you saying, an A 10 or squadron thereof, had the time and accuracy to shred the wing box, in flight, to the point that it was completely unidentifiable?
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
The population has been lied to so often by the USA goverment in the last 10 years.
I no longer trust anything that is said. Who's fault is that?

Or do you think people should just follow blindly no matter what?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The population has been lied to so often by the USA goverment in the last 10 years.
Agreed. So has the Canadian public, the British public, the Russian public, the Saudi public, the Israeli public, the Gazan public and so and so on...

The US is not an isolated case.

I no longer trust anything that is said. Who's fault is that?
The media and where the get their intel.

It is up to the individual to either swallow it whole, or go digging.

But when you go digging, you still have to use critical thought, commonsense and reason.

Or do you think people should just follow blindly no matter what?
No, that's just silly. And the very reason many of you people are so easliy proven wrong. You swallow the anti-intel, way to easily. Because you don't use critical thought, commonsense and reason. When you think you're looking for the truth.