That actually brought attention to a legitimate cause.
This didn't.
/checkmate
That actually brought attention to a legitimate cause.
This didn't.
/checkmate
So, you think you are the arbiter of what protests are allowed, and what are not? Is this a federally-appointed position?
AS usual you got it backwards.
Ha's to be the most biased article I ever read. I could insert the names of a dozen leftwingnut groups in there and the article would not only read the same it would then be factual.
Yup. Context is key.I was listening to the "Proud Boys" talking at the demonstration and I'm not sure that I heard "hate". They were saying or asking why Canadians should be responsible for something that happened 250+ years ago. It that hate?
But wait, you said there was not point to what they did, so why aren't you calling for their heads?
The typical whimper of those who willfully misunderstand that free speech doesn't guarantee you a job.... Because free speech only exists for approved opinions and messages