2SLGBTQQIA+

[Serryah]

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/5233302-transgender-fencer-maryland/

And to explain the graph included a bit better: her fencing record.

Fencing Tracker

Statistics and analytics for the sport of fencing

fencingtracker.com

But... but...

I thought "Biological men" ALWAYS beat Women in ANY sport????

I guess it's only "Biological Men" she's okay with beating, but trans women is a line too far?

And of course she's rewarded for it.

Fencer who took a knee against trans rival gets reward

The female fencer who refused to compete against a transgender opponent last month has received an award for her actions.

www.dailymail.co.uk

"'By taking a knee, she became more powerful than any male. She stood her ground to fight for women's sports,' XX-XY Athletics founder Jennifer Sey said in a press release. 'She's a hero.'"

I think maybe they need to look at her history in the sport.

 

[Taxslave2]

It was not a transphobic tantrum. It was a real woman standing up for women's sports.

 

[Serryah]

It was not a transphobic tantrum. It was a real woman standing up for women's sports.

Did you miss the part where she fought against "real men" and won?

Her only issue would then be... the fact the woman was trans, and she couldn't stand it, made it out to be an issue. When it's not.

 

[harrylee]

 

[Taxslave2]

Did you miss the part where she fought against "real men" and won?

Her only issue would then be... the fact the woman was trans, and she couldn't stand it, made it out to be an issue. When it's not.

Did you miss the part about a man wanting to compete in women's sports?

 

[Serryah]

Did you miss the part about a man wanting to compete in women's sports?

Well one, she had no issues with competing against men before she 'took the knee' for this fight.

Two - her opponent in this fight was a trans woman, not a man.

Three - The fact this person has beat men before proves that women CAN beat men in sports, so the whole "men have advantages over women!" is absolute BS.

Finally - this was NOT about her fighting a "man", this was about her trying to make herself into some sort of "hero" (oh wait, she was claimed to BE a hero; so goal achieved I guess?) for "Standing up to" a trans person. This was about bigotry, period. At least be honest enough to admit that much.

 

[harrylee]

 

[petros]

Well one, she had no issues with competing against men before she 'took the knee' for this fight.

Two - her opponent in this fight was a trans woman, not a man.

Three - The fact this person has beat men before proves that women CAN beat men in sports, so the whole "men have advantages over women!" is absolute BS.

Finally - this was NOT about her fighting a "man", this was about her trying to make herself into some sort of "hero" (oh wait, she was claimed to BE a hero; so goal achieved I guess?) for "Standing up to" a trans person. This was about bigotry, period. At least be honest enough to admit that much.

You wouldn't compete with me....especially if nobody held me back.

 

[harrylee]

 

[petros]

UK Supreme Court backs 'biological' definition of woman

Judges at the UK Supreme Court have unanimously ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law.

It marks the culmination of a long-running legal battle which could have major implications for how sex-based rights apply across Scotland, England and Wales.

The court sided with campaign group For Women Scotland, which brought a case against the Scottish government arguing that sex-based protections should only apply to people that are born female.

Judge Lord Hodge said the ruling should not be seen as a triumph of one side over the other, and stressed that the law still gives protection against discrimination to transgender people.

Supreme Court backs 'biological' definition of woman

Judges deliver a landmark ruling on how a woman is defined under the law.

www.bbc.com

 

[Taxslave2]

You wouldn't compete with me....especially if nobody held me back.

Yeah, but you two would just be fighting to see who gets on top.

 

[Taxslave2]

Well one, she had no issues with competing against men before she 'took the knee' for this fight.

Two - her opponent in this fight was a trans woman, not a man.

Three - The fact this person has beat men before proves that women CAN beat men in sports, so the whole "men have advantages over women!" is absolute BS.

Finally - this was NOT about her fighting a "man", this was about her trying to make herself into some sort of "hero" (oh wait, she was claimed to BE a hero; so goal achieved I guess?) for "Standing up to" a trans person. This was about bigotry, period. At least be honest enough to admit that much.

We already know you are a bigot.

 

[Serryah]

We already know you are a bigot.

I'M a Bigot? Goddamn, Tax, have you looked in a mirror lately?

Better yet, as you typed that did you burst into flames for the hypocrisy?

 

[Taxslave2]

I'M a Bigot? Goddamn, Tax, have you looked in a mirror lately?

Better yet, as you typed that did you burst into flames for the hypocrisy?

I'm not the one that thinks men should be allowed to play woman's sports because they are not good enough to win in the men's leagues.

 

[Taxslave2]

According to Rebel News, the UK supreme court ruled that tranys are not real women. Oddly enough, it had to do with school board elections in Scotland.

 

[petros]

According to Rebel News, the UK supreme court ruled that tranys are not real women. Oddly enough, it had to do with school board elections in Scotland.

It's posted above. BBC

 

[spaminator]

 

[Serryah]

I'm not the one that thinks men should be allowed to play woman's sports because they are not good enough to win in the men's leagues.

I don't think that.

I think men should play men's sports, women women's sports, and if there's a mixed/co-ed league, then that's fine.

 

[Serryah]

According to Rebel News, the UK supreme court ruled that tranys are not real women. Oddly enough, it had to do with school board elections in Scotland.

"Rebel News" isn't exactly an unbiased source.

But yeah, the UK Court ruled about "Biological women", which is funny since trans women are still biological women, so..

 

[petros]

"Rebel News" isn't exactly an unbiased source.

But yeah, the UK Court ruled about "Biological women", which is funny since trans women are still biological women, so..

No the aren't. They are men. It's like saying there is gravity and "special" gravity (anomalous gravity, a deviation from the expected gravitational pull at a specific location on Earth) that isn't gravity.

It's still all gravity.