Here's an idea.
You don't want male looking trans women to win races and have that 'advantage', then stand up to allow for blockers for kids until they figure out if they are trans OR it's another issue, and then they can start Estrogen, which will at least allow them to be more 'female' in their appearances and body structure.
Then you can't complain about 'unfairness'.
Otherwise, crymore that this trans woman won the race despite looking 'too masculine' for your sensibilities.
A child shouldn’t be allowed to deform their body because of a mental disease until they are adults..
..and Trannies shouldn’t be competing in sports where they have unfair advantage..
Children aren't deforming their bodies. But it figures you would believe that utter BS coming from the scared of trans people masses.
If you don't want them to have an 'unfair' advantage, then let them prevent that. Simple.
Can't have it both ways - oh wait, you don't want it 'both ways' you just want to wipe out the fact trans people exist.
Sorry, that's not happening either. They've existed as long as people have walked this rock and will continue to do so despite your whining.
Maybe we can let boys be boys and girls be girls , that is a forgotten concept for some reason .Here's an idea.
You don't want male looking trans women to win races and have that 'advantage', then stand up to allow for blockers for kids until they figure out if they are trans OR it's another issue, and then they can start Estrogen, which will at least allow them to be more 'female' in their appearances and body structure.
Then you can't complain about 'unfairness'.
Otherwise, crymore that this trans woman won the race despite looking 'too masculine' for your sensibilities.
Once past puberty, two people (a man & a woman) of the same size and age, odds are the man is going to be MUCH stronger. I’m not trying to be a dick but that’s just the way it is. That chemical biological soup that floods through us all during puberty is different for men and women, and that’s not a bad thing but the end result for males and females afterwards is very different.
And the woman is equally likely to be more agile. Why is strength the defining criterion?
Once past puberty, two people (a man & a woman) of the same size and age, odds are the man is going to be MUCH stronger. I’m not trying to be a dick but that’s just the way it is. That chemical biological soup that floods through us all during puberty is different for men and women, and that’s not a bad thing but the end result for males and females afterwards is very different.
I’m no expert on the subject & I don’t even pretend to be, or even to be knowledgable on the subject in all honesty.