2SLGBTQQIA+

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,710
9,243
113
Washington DC
Speaking for Canada.
This crisis is just one of many that left-wingers have created.
Just like the toxic masculinity crisis in the workplace.
The misogyny crisis in the RCMP and the CF.
The climate crisis.
The misinformation crisis.

Before this most Canadians didn't give a shit who you screwed or how you dressed.
Don't have to be "most." A loud enough or violent enough or intolerant enough minority can make a real difference.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,798
2,712
113
New Brunswick

Because for kids, girls should NEVER wear pants or shorts and should always wear dresses, skirts and frilly things in pastel colors, while boys wear jeans, t-shirts and so on in blues, blacks and grays. And no short hair for girls, no long hair for boys. No more short names, only legal full names please.

Thankfully the bill was withdrawn.

For now.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,301
13,954
113
Low Earth Orbit

Because for kids, girls should NEVER wear pants or shorts and should always wear dresses, skirts and frilly things in pastel colors, while boys wear jeans, t-shirts and so on in blues, blacks and grays. And no short hair for girls, no long hair for boys. No more short names, only legal full names please.

Thankfully the bill was withdrawn.

For now.
How do you feel aboot "gang colours"?
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,469
3,476
113
my sisters are lady gaga fans. lady gagas little monsters were nearly blown up by terrorists. :eek:
 
Last edited:

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,822
2,761
113

Because for kids, girls should NEVER wear pants or shorts and should always wear dresses, skirts and frilly things in pastel colors, while boys wear jeans, t-shirts and so on in blues, blacks and grays. And no short hair for girls, no long hair for boys. No more short names, only legal full names please.

Thankfully the bill was withdrawn.

For now.
Fairly wild. Girls in jeans is fine, but boys better not be wearing anything resembling a dress, unless it is a kilt, and they are Scottish. But is it any different from Quebec's anti religious symbol law?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,301
13,954
113
Low Earth Orbit
Fairly wild. Girls in jeans is fine, but boys better not be wearing anything resembling a dress, unless it is a kilt, and they are Scottish. But is it any different from Quebec's anti religious symbol law?
Kilts are fine until you wear pantyhose but then again back in the day we wore pantyhose under hockey gear when having outdoor practice at 5AM.

Toasty warm.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,351
10,670
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Fairly wild. Girls in jeans is fine, but boys better not be wearing anything resembling a dress, unless it is a kilt, and they are Scottish. But is it any different from Quebec's anti religious symbol law?
I wore shorts under my kilt as when I was wearing one I was also bouncing for a pavilion & didn’t wanna end up, rolling with somebody on the ground with that kilt up around my armpits. I figured that was a courtesy for everybody.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taxslave2

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,798
2,712
113
New Brunswick

More proof that the TERFS are more a danger to kids than trans people.

And point well made: if she WERE a Trans person, there'd be international news on this and TERFS would never shut the fuck up about it.

But one of their own?

Fucking silence.

To be clear, this person is a goddamn monster - ANYONE who does this to kids is a goddamn monster, trans, non-trans, whoever.

But the SILENCE is the issue. The DOUBLE STANDARD is just insane.

Trans people have to PROVE they're not a danger, while non-trans people ARE the danger.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,409
8,045
113
B.C.

More proof that the TERFS are more a danger to kids than trans people.

And point well made: if she WERE a Trans person, there'd be international news on this and TERFS would never shut the fuck up about it.

But one of their own?

Fucking silence.

To be clear, this person is a goddamn monster - ANYONE who does this to kids is a goddamn monster, trans, non-trans, whoever.

But the SILENCE is the issue. The DOUBLE STANDARD is just insane.

Trans people have to PROVE they're not a danger, while non-trans people ARE the danger.
Anyone who preys on children deserve the highest punishment the law allows regardless of pronouns . If the courts do not act parents and family will act .Vigilante Justice is not cool .
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,351
10,670
113
Regina, Saskatchewan

More proof that the TERFS are more a danger to kids than trans people.

And point well made: if she WERE a Trans person, there'd be international news on this and TERFS would never shut the fuck up about it.

But one of their own?

Fucking silence.

To be clear, this person is a goddamn monster - ANYONE who does this to kids is a goddamn monster, trans, non-trans, whoever.

But the SILENCE is the issue. The DOUBLE STANDARD is just insane.

Trans people have to PROVE they're not a danger, while non-trans people ARE the danger.
Well, I made it close to 5 minutes into the video, & the mental defect the video is about should be in an institution where she doesn’t have access to children. Whether that’s a mental institution or a correctional institution, or a mental institution inside of a correctional facility…the end is the same.