2SLGBTQQIA+

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,093
13,854
113
Low Earth Orbit
IMO that's why it's such a slippery slope; the definition of man/woman has changed, or it's no longer as 'narrow' as it once was because that narrow definition doesn't fit anymore. It actually never did, just society (predominantly European/Christian/Religious society) forced the definition to be that one narrow view.
Man = adult male.
Woman = adult female.

Fuck all was forced by predominantly European/Christian/Religious societies.

That is complete and total fucking bullshit and you know it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,362
7,989
113
B.C.
Man = adult male.
Woman = adult female.

Fuck all was forced by predominantly European/Christian/Religious societies.

That is complete and total fucking bullshit and you know it.
It has to be , because the concept of man and woman is in every society or race throughout time , including the Amazons .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,625
9,200
113
Washington DC
Man = adult male.
Woman = adult female.

Fuck all was forced by predominantly European/Christian/Religious societies.

That is complete and total fucking bullshit and you know it.
So. . . when somebody exhorts somebody to "Be a man!" they're encouraging him to be an adult male human? And nothing more?
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,759
2,701
113
New Brunswick
It's not a religious issue at all. WTF??

Not a religious issue?

As if the dominance of religion of what 'manhood' and 'womanhood' is supposed to be and mean WASN'T a thing?

Wow... but then I suppose you ARE someone who is of those predominant faiths, aren't you? Christian, Jewish, Islamic... the big three for assholery.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,362
7,989
113
B.C.
Not a religious issue?

As if the dominance of religion of what 'manhood' and 'womanhood' is supposed to be and mean WASN'T a thing?

Wow... but then I suppose you ARE someone who is of those predominant faiths, aren't you? Christian, Jewish, Islamic... the big three for assholery.
So how about the Aztecs and the Han , or maybe Nippon ?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
116,093
13,854
113
Low Earth Orbit
Neither, but your attempt to set up an either/or is just really cute!

I already explained. Too bad you're too dim to get it.
Antagonistic bullshit is bullshit. Do you think I'm baiting you? You should know by now where I stand on the alleged "6 core genders".

The other 65 are just plain fucked.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,625
9,200
113
Washington DC
Antagonistic bullshit is bullshit. Do you think I'm baiting you? You should know by now where I stand on the alleged "6 core genders".

The other 65 are just plain fucked.
So. . . by demonstrating my earlier point that terms like "man" and "woman" are multifunctional and context-dependent, I hurt your feels.

Awwww.
 

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113

Now that is a picture that the white Marxist liberal woke screwballs are trying to portray as not being so Canadian anymore. A white family in a picture holding hands together and looking happy with kids is a big No-NO in Canada today. Don't let or show that picture to a white woke liberal. That would surely freak them out big time. Now two gay guys or a mixed racial couple holding hands together with kids, well, that will now be seen as the new normal family and that kind of picture will surely make their woke liberal day. :D