12 dead in attack on Paris newspaper; France goes on alert

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Criminal violence. Your free speech rights exist vis-a-vis the government. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads "Congress shall make no law. . . abridging the freedom of speech.".
. That demonstrates that the Paris thing was not about freedom of speech, it was about mass murder.
The rest of the post reminds me of what Clinton said to deflect the accusations..
"It all depends what the meaning of the word "is" is.....

 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Same could be said for other religions too..




yep.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
Those who cannot see the difference between the two are only fooling themselves.
Same as a policeman or a soldier... a nun chooses to join a convent...
It's all about choice don't you see?

I do see.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Those who cannot see the difference between the two are only fooling themselves.
Same as a policeman or a soldier... a nun chooses to join a convent...
It's all about choice don't you see?


I see. But by now they're on to the next unreasonable comparison.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
"unreasonable comparison"...sounds like some kind of party game.

Oh eh, Eh ho..

It's still the Subjection of Women, merely because of their gender and not for any substantive.

Women are not supposed to be priests, just nunes.

Women turning to Islam seems to very...backward.

The question is WHY women turn to Islam, I guess the same as women who become Catholic Nunes. FAITH.

I don't think that is an "unreasonable comparison," and I think you know I don't agree with the way Muslim women are treated.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
""Oh eh, Eh ho..

It's still the Subjection of Women, merely because of their gender and not for any substantive.

Women are not supposed to be priests, just nunes."""

That's pretty funny as well. NUNES..........................nunes in the dunes.........Nuunies in the boonies.....

:lol:............sorry.


not.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
""Oh eh, Eh ho..

It's still the Subjection of Women, merely because of their gender and not for any substantive.

Women are not supposed to be priests, just nunes."""

That's pretty funny as well. NUNES..........................nunes in the dunes.........Nuunies in the boonies.....

:lol:............sorry.


not.
Priests wore a Cassock , so did the "brothers" when I went to school....Now Nuns, priests or brothers do not have to wear them anymore except for ceremonial stuff..... used to is the key phrase.....
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
It's still the Subjection of Women, merely because of their gender and not for any substantive.

Women are not supposed to be priests, just nuns.



The question is WHY women turn to Islam, I guess the same as women who become Catholic Nunes. FAITH.

I don't think that is an "unreasonable comparison," and I think you know I don't agree with the way Muslim women are treated.

Or it's a coping mechanism.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
A transcript of the conversation between the Muslim Jihadist Cherif Kouachi and a reporter.

Journalist: Ok, and are you planning on killing again in the name of Allah or not?

Kouachi: Kill who?

Journalist: I don’t know. That’s what I’m asking you.

Kouachi: Did we kill any civilians in the past two days people have been looking for us?

Journalist: You killed journalists.

Kouachi: No but, did we kill any civilians? Civilians, or people during the two days you spent looking for us?

Journalist: Wait, wait, Cherif, Cherif, did you kill this morning?

Kouachi: But we are not killers. We are defenders of the prophet. We don’t kill women, we don’t kill anyone. We defend the prophet. If someone offend the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him. But we don’t kill women. We’re not like you. You’re the ones killing the children of Muslims in Irak, in Syria, in Afghanistan. That’s you. Not us. We have honor codes in Islam.



Cherif Kouachi dodges the question because he’s defining civilians differently than the West does. He doesn’t mean citizens or unarmed people. His Islamic honor code justifies murdering people who violate Islamic law.
Muslims don’t like having their actions described in such stark terms. They want to see themselves as heroes. As knights of the Jihad, instead of cowardly murderers who not only kill civilians, but hide behind them.


“Are You Planning on Killing Again in the Name of Allah?” | FrontPage Magazine