Search results

yes... it wasn't your full post I replied to... it was an extract from your full post. That's quite the moderator example you're setting, hey!

and yet you and 'the others' can't get enough of these threads... so long as, apparently, the message is one you favour/you're comfortable with. Other than from member's Tonington and Zipperfish, I've yet to read a single thing from any of you that is measured, informative and value add to the...

I have much to say on that subject... but why bother? Any time I've initiated the beginnings of a respectful dialogue, it simply gets immediately trashed by you chuckleheads who simply can't rise above your own inanity! This board let's the inmates run the asylum! You call this...

look in a mirror Mr OneLiner!

petrocd... please take your OCD meds! Now! petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now!

petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now! petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now! petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now! petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now! petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now! petrocd... take your OCD meds! Now!

you have no interest in discussing related subject matter; simply because you don't have the background knowledge and understanding. So you go with all ya got left... you rail on about Suzuki/Gore, you beak off about truthers/greentards... cause you got no game. You have the audacity to talk...

the only one dancing here is you trying to beat on your own strawman. If you want to talk about the proceedings of climate change negotiations I suggest you invest a few cycles and do some research... I expect you'd have much to legitimately bring forward for scrutiny/discussion. As it stands...

ftfy

you can't discuss the subject matter on any level; in that regard, you're a denier simply for denial's sake. Your brand of fun... of real fun... is to charge into these threads and simply showcase your cartoonish, juvenile best! You got no game - none!

no - sorry, no obsession... certainly not any more than all the fervent deniers that flood these threads, hey... ya think! :mrgreen: Your obsession with posting nothingness, I expect, makes you leader of your local chuckle-head chapter... am I right, am I right? here's a thought: try to rise...

well done... on par with your usual dredging finds! UNFCCC - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change --- created in 1992 IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change --- created in 1988

again, another chirper who couldn't discuss or argue anything of the subject matter... but hey, your comment gives you a sense of contribution otherwise!

it's your strawman to inflate; again, the googly find you're so pumped over has no standing, no authority and no association with any climate negotiations.Yet somehow, your blowhard self, really thinks it has bearing/legitimacy - go figure!

November 12, 1998 signed... but not ratified. Yes, the U.S. was a signatory of the Kyoto protocol. it's your strawman to inflate; again, the googly find you're so pumped over has no standing, no authority and no association with any climate negotiations.Yet somehow, your blowhard self, really...

your denial will not prevail

I gave em a quick glance... there's one I'd put some significance around... but it's the one you must have misfired on, cause it only addresses 10 years. But again, you're sure a real ballsy guy considering your recent big-time fail concerning surface-temperature and ocean warming. I already...

oh my! Colpy, your googly is firing on all cylinders!!! :lol: Is this you making your case for "the pause"? You're clearly a freakin' C&P wizard!

Locuteus, you often appear burned out; ready for a change...you are not paid. The work is hard. Why do you continue? 8O that's weak Walter... even for your standards, that's weak!

not sure why you want to make this comment in relation to the post of mine you quoted. Both of the statements I made are factual; if you believe otherwise, step-up and make your case why they're not. The recent heatwave in Australia is on record... this was only mentioned to remind "the Walter...