Search results

you made shyte up about about what I said... I called you on it by quoting a prior post that includes a graphic that busts your fabrication and busts yet another of your pet-theories. As I said, feel free to counter that graphic presentation and present data/graphic detail that shows a positive...

and along comes MrOneLiner... again, railing against graphs!

now you resort to fabrication? How desperate are you? The following post shows variance; unfortunately for you it also shows a reverse-correlation between temperature and solar irradiance. Please feel free to attempt to counter the data representation within that graphic...

I wonder why member 'Locutus' would quote a tweet from a guy with a profile that says he is 'ex Army and has a MBA'... cause it's that guy who added his own interpretative text to that graphic... the one sourced, per the graphic annotation, from "Climatologist Cliff Harris and Meteorologist...

I don't know... the "auditor" is very selective about what he takes on!

oh wait... what's this... are you now claiming you weren't trumpeting that NASA workshop report as some type of vindication for your pet-theories? Are you now... NOW... distancing yourself from it? Make up your mind! Come on; come out of the vague shadows you clearly prefer! Poser!

you clearly are the GreatPoser! You drop a workshop report... hundreds of pages in length... with yet another grand "ta da" of yours! You don't say a single thing about the report... not one thing! You don't try to indicate what significance the report holds... particularl significance to...

no need for another of your go-fetch routines... simply answer the questions. You've repeatedly thrown down this "Holecene 4 degree warmer statement"... of course, you never elaborate on it, you just do a "ta da" drop of the statement. Now, when you're actually asked to answer a couple of...

why are you feverishly distracting from my questions?

a "real" scientist like you should have no difficulty with my question - wassup!

oh my! Was my question too pointedly direct for you? And which of your pet theories are you talking about here; specifically? Is there a list of them? :mrgreen:

you really want to say something about the 'Holocene optimum'... why not just say it? Why are you such a tease? :lol: By the by, what was the cause(s) of warming during that period... and how does that apply in relation to today's relatively recent warming?

talk about alarmist media presentation, hey Walter! The article's only direct quote included reads "If the earth's temperature rose 2C, she warned, there would be risks that were "difficult and dangerous". So... we go from her described "difficult and dangerous risk"... up to a titled "save...

the reason for such things as the "UN Green Climate fund" is to position a transfer of money to those countries most affected, most impacted by climate change... of course, those most affected countries are the countries that have contributed the least to emissions increase and they're the...

you certainly have no standing... less than zero standing... to suggest (as you have) that NASA, NOAA, PIOMAS, etc.... are proven frauds! The very fact you would state such a thing is, again, simply a reflection on your displayed "Dunning-Kruger effect". :mrgreen: ... and there we have it! If...

at least the guy's not your regular go-to "Goddard guy"! :lol: Does fixating on a blogger's prediction... a blogger... does that allow you guys to just ignore the reality of actual Arctic sea-ice extent/volume long-term melting?

what's to dispute? Sorry I burst your red-colour highlighted text bubble... again, I presented that meta-study (of studies) that detailed what positions published scientific papers of that related "70s period" had taken. That study (and others like it) found that the significant majority of...

I said you were a connoisseur! And more... you're an arteeest! Stand firm; hold your resolve! Never, never... let your appreciation of the arts get in your way of actually commenting on the underlying mundane study/findings, vis-a-vis the busting of the "70s Global Cooling" meme!

patience grasshopper! but what kind of person was the author of your linked article, one "John L. Daly" who might presume to challenge real scientists and the fundamental science of the greenhouse effect? Daly, an Australian school teacher now dead for over a decade; a guy with no formal...

from an earlier post in a different thread... of course, it really belongs in this thread: re: "the 70's Global Cooling meme": an assortment of meta-studies have actually looked at scientific publications during that period in question in an attempt to put to rest this meme. Example: the...