Search results

just "who" is not willing to debate "the theories"? what standing does Steyn hold? It's so bad his defense for the Mann suit is to claim he's not an expert and he shouldn't be held to account for what he said! That's... your "expert" commenting on "peer-review"? the whole hackergate thing...

and here I thought your question was meant seriously; excuse me for actually thinking you wanted a real discussion! Perhaps you might step-up and speak to the "dire warnings" you claim I've stated? You clearly bumbled your grand idea to capture "wildfire CO2 being released into the atmosphere...

in the traditional source/sink context, forest fires aren't natural... and "uncontrolled" as most are, wouldn't be considered within a planned "land-use" shifting. Not sure how you would propose capturing CO2 from burning wildfires??? In any case, you do highlight a most significant facet of...

what "conveniently located natural sources" are you speaking to... examples, please:

his bait... bit him, big-time! I expect he didn't read his full quotation and missed this last paragraph zinger! "The pattern of modeled surface temperature changes induced by solar variability is well correlated with observed global warming over the first half of the 20th century, but not...

why so vague! Which 2 drivers and which one is diminishing (and why)? yup, the owner(s)/operator(s) of this forum..... or are you calling the shots around here? :mrgreen:

as I mentioned, member petrocd tried the same thing a short while back on another subject/quoted reference he had made... he made a mad scramble effort to attempt to dissociate himself from it. And now he does it again!

Cappy says everything I've put forward has been refuted... by multiple sources. I must have missed the one that busts, for example this following post, the topic aided and abetted by none other than member 'petros'! Oh my, member 'petros' puts forward a paper reference from the same scientist...

petrocd... is this you once again scrambling to disassociate yourself from a website quotation you put forward? I called you on this tactic of yours a short while back! And now you're going to do it again?

what's been refuted and shut down with multiple sources. Name it/them... sure you can! Can you present any one thing, in particular :mrgreen:

I've already addressed it multiple times... it has no authority and no association to actual climate negotiations. Now... if you'd like to champion that strawman, please do so... step forward and give it legitimacy, speak to it's authority, it's associations, it's relevance! Champion that...

you must really think your strawman has legs for you to carry it across into, now with this post, 2 distinct threads. I'll ask you the same questions you're avoiding in the other thread:

like I said... take solace in it! It's what rogue nations do... you know, like the U.S. has done many times over in regards to international agreements... sign em and refuse to ratify em! you really revel in your strawman antics! I asked you to qualify the authority of your googly find...

guys, guys... I'm missing the authoritative associations behind your 'gem of a find', particularly how it translates into the working process of formal climate negotiations. :mrgreen:

really Walter? You mean all it took was calling you out in the other thread... calling you out to support your OP... to present some of your expressed representative "facts"? Was just asking you to identify some of those "facts", all it took? Is that really all it took, Walter? :lol:

and the U.S. was also in agreement... by signing it... and by influencing the makeup of the agreement and what other other countries did while presuming upon the expressed U.S. commitments. You can forever choose to ignore this fact... you can continue to take solace in the fact your country...

here Teddy... err, Walter! :lol: Walter, get a clue!

of course that "CO2 sole source" is simply a strawman as CO2 is considered the principal source, not the sole source. Here's an article reference to a later paper from the same lead-author of the study member 'petros' links to (above): Scientists detect carbon dioxide accumulation at the edge of...

oh ya baby! You're such a "manly-man"... you stud-muffin you! But hey, no problem... no discussion with you is requested, or needed... I'm most content to simply point out your "manly-contradictions" and your "manly-penchant-for-pet-theories-you-can't-support". Carry on!

I'm asking for your help Walter? You talk of "facts"... I'd like to read some of your particular expressed 'facts". I don't want you to just say "go fetch" by dropping a high-level link to a guys blog homepage... surely, you can highlight a few select "facts" for edification! Surely! that...