Search results

Questions: what premise are you presuming to speak to in regards warming through the various atmospheric layers, particularly as may reflect upon the relatively recent warming of the earth over the last 50-60 years or so? Does this mean you're shifting your alternate grab-bag attention away from...

no - see, here's the diff: I gave Walter a most precise assignment, one clearly laid out... one that, if he was inclined, he could resolve in very short order with a few googlies. Your go-fetch routine is to drop an assortment of links without any accompanying measure of just what you're...

Walter!!! ... your article... that's from Lawdy Monckton. Have you no shame? :mrgreen: How come the RSS dataset has suddenly become the favoured darling of deniers, hey? taxi, where's your questioning of what Walter just put forward? Do you just accept "that truth" blindly, openly and most...

Walter... I can't work miracles, particularly with those (like you) who refuse to first help themselves! For the 3rd time, your assignment is:

Walter!!! You just repeated the same link you provided in your first post! You didn't take my assignment seriously, at all... here, try it again:

note Locutus: your post has been bold highlighted, colour enhanced and font amplified ... for the comprehension impaired!

geezaz Locutus... your twitter summation takes extreme liberty with that article reference. You know, where the author does an impressive indepth analysis on depleting snow at ski resorts... how many must rely on artificial snow just to keep open. It seems your twitter hack takes an article...

Walter! It was your task to substantiate your claim that there has been no increase in extreme weather associated with increased warming/climate change. Is this... that... your evidence? :mrgreen: It seems we left off with the following post from a couple of weeks ago... but is this post of...

hey DuhSleeper! Am I conversing with/responding to the, uhhh...... irregular protagonists... the irregular ones?

your assessment of M&M's contribution is very debatable, with many rat-holes to explore... and many have done so with results that don't paint McIntyre favorably, at all. Background perspective on M&M... reinforcing your advocacy emphasis: part 1... part2: to suggest the science is tainted, as...

Colpy... you slid right on by my entire post... the ColpyCon chooses to ignore all those graphs that so incense member 'taxi'! Steyn is just a "journalist"... and in recent days you're feverishly trying to resurrect Hackergate... as is much of the denialsphere! I suggested to you that even if...

your claims are repeatedly shown to be false... and yet you persist! The ColpyCon persists: speaking of "recovery"... of "growing again" based on a single year reference is nonsense... notwithstanding the context with Extent increase is single versus multi-year ice. Single year ice is that ice...

there's no there there! Even within your trumped up Hackergate reference... you played this earlier and I asked you what happened to the (2) papers in question. I asked you if they were suppressed. You didn't answer, why so? again, hundreds of skeptical papers get published regularly. Your...

Walter!!! Don't just give me a reddie... why aren't you asking misinforming member 'Locutus' to source his graph? Walter, why are you so ready to just blindly accept that graph? tweets blocked!!! Outrageous :mrgreen: ah yes, there goes Colpy again! Once again flogging the deniers regular...

taxi! Here taxi, here taxi... taxi! C'mon now... here it is! Here taxi, here taxi! Special for you... just for you taxi... your nemesis! Another graph taxi... another one! :mrgreen:

Tisdale is a hack... and he most certainly creates/states his own "interpretations"; those that he foments on denier blogs. Blogs... but never, ever, ever has he tried to bring that BS of his forward in formal journals to presume to challenge actual scientists, actual publications. the IPCC...

oh Locutus you! I should have known renowned charlatan 'Bob Tisdale' would be one of your go-to guys. Locutus... ever wonder why Tisdale has never bothered to publish his scientific wisdom... never even tried to formally challenge an actual scientific paper? Have you ever read the actual quote...

what is your... big picture... at least today/this week? Just what are you presuming to suggest about the temperature of the atmosphere and whatever relationship you presume to draw from that in regards to earth's surface temperature? More pointedly, what particular atmospheric layer(s) are you...

yabut... how does this fit within yet another of your pet alternate theories on warming... err... cooling... err... pause... err... oh wait... just where are you at again?