Search results

the IPCC had nothing to do with this... no matter how often and how hard you keep repeating that refrain. the 'stunt' side, on occasion (as now) often takes away from the legitimate/meaningful work the organization does do.

what do the buses that arrive at the site travel on... genius? Is there a train station right at the site? :mrgreen: of course... if you'd actually been there... you would know this!

if repeating Peruvian government official accounts of the damage observed is, to you, "an attempt to sanction and/or diminish"... you are mistaken. Perhaps you might be more inclined to this projected approach/message... yes?

what I said... regardless of what you choose to make up! but like I said, you have no standing to speak of impacts/effects/damage... not when you deny the impacts/effects/damage from GW/AGW/CC to the world's ecosystems.

your blowhardiness doesn't allow you to speak for "the rest of the world"! Nor does it allow you to quibble over my choice of words, particularly when I've also spoken of criminal and/or civil liability outcomes in that thread.

:mrgreen: hey genius... how do you get from Aguas Calientes to the site itself "You are a f-cking LIAR!!!... it's called the Inca Trail... if you had been there you'd know that.

the yellow lettering is cloth material that has now been removed. No actual damage has been reported to the "Nazca Lines" themselves. As I said, as related by Peruvian government officials in separate reports I've read, the "possible damage associated with the activity centers around the open...

try reading the following post again... notwithstanding I highlighted the apology. Apparently, to you, stating the action was unwise and emphasizing an apology, somehow... somehow... that to you equates to "vandalism is OK"! :mrgreen: But like I said, in the face of your denial of the...

where are you reading anyone say no damage was done? Peruvian government archeologists are on site actively assessing damage... I described the damage I've read that has been reported to-date. try to read the linked reference before you utter your standard drive-by BS!

Greenpeace apology and event-action timeline: no damage has been done to the actual Nazca lines themselves... possible damage associated with the activity centers around the open area of the cloth-lettering statement inclusive of over-turned rocks, foot prints, and cracked/broken "patina"...

of course, Coleman is a long-standing denier hack who has been repeatedly debunked on his crap... and no, John Coleman, is not a meteorologist... he is a but a TV weatherman! Looks like member Locutus (and his faithful lapper Walter) are really reaching the dregs by trotting out yet another...

perhaps this explains your affinity for your grab-bag collection of those extolling the virtues of your favoured alternate pet theories!

weak Walter, even by your weak standards! By the by Walter, why does the, as you say, "gubmint want it"? :mrgreen: Here I thought the fossil-fuel posse had "gubmint" in its pocket! Wassup Walter?

and, of course... their respective methodologies are not identical... yet, as you say, statistically similar results. Comparison with the Met and JMA included

you've been nattering on this point for a while now! Why do you imply the results should be "identical"? of course! As pointed out to member Locutus previously... clearly member Locutus knows this... recognizes this! And yet, member Locutus persists in perpetuating the purposeful Goddard...

Locutus... more... yet more of your C&P wizardry of "Steve Goddard" misinformation? Again, Locutus, Goddard has been thoroughly and consistently debunked over his ongoing missive against NOAA these past years. I've shown you some of that through your earlier parroting of Goddard..... and yet...

the melting Greenland ice-sheet: just released study using satellite and aerial data from NASA's ICESat spacecraft and Operation IceBridge field campaign to reconstruct how the height of the Greenland Ice Sheet changed at nearly 100,000 locations from 1993 to 2012. The study found that the...

November temperature updates available...... 2014 is absolutely tracking to become the warmest year on instrumental record:

give a little... answer a few questions! Tis the season for giving.

member Tonington??? A condescending prick??? That's most certainly not the impression I've formed. I guess you'll find any fabricated rationale to avoid answering inconvenient questions, yes?