Search results

  1. waldo

    New Years Resolutions For Climate Scientists

    you have been alerted to the CC Rules; you are purposely and flagrantly ignoring them. Do you feel you are above the board rules and they don't apply to you? Do you feel you have the personal latitude to continue to purposely derail threads? Do you have no respect for the CC Forum and its...
  2. waldo

    New Years Resolutions For Climate Scientists

    per CC Rules: You are free to express your views forcefully but we require you to remain civil. Insults, hate speech, and deliberately inflammatory statements, commonly known as trolling, are not acceptable.
  3. waldo

    New Years Resolutions For Climate Scientists

    troll away trolls... please note CC Rules: You are free to express your views forcefully but we require you to remain civil. Insults, hate speech, and deliberately inflammatory statements, commonly known as trolling, are not acceptable.
  4. waldo

    Death knell for AGW

    not surprising that you would interpret the post details in the way you've conveyed. Good on ya for truly coming out and showcasing you are a confirmed denier. Only the fringe of the fringe actually challenge warming anymore... you appear to be in fitting company. . no - the graph is a visual...
  5. waldo

    Our cooling world

    you're posting that from a weather web site... could that be weather? Ever been to northern Arizona... Flagstaff perhaps... they get a lot of snow there, regularly!
  6. waldo

    New Years Resolutions For Climate Scientists

    integrity? You speak of integrity... while you drop yet another CPR (Cut & Paste & Run) from serial misinformer "Steven Goddard". We've already dealt with a few of these BS items previously... and yet you persist! Goddard has been refuted over and over again... and yet you persist! Your guy...
  7. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    that is funny... I'd offer a 'bum fight' anecdote but I expect one of this BROcrew would similarly use it as a part of their marginalization ployBook! That would screech and wail that I was never at the bum fight... they would pick apart my anecdote and, without foundation, claim I was lying...
  8. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    a real moderator would have stepped in by now and sent us packing - yes? You've helped perpetuate this with some of your posts... I've put the same pointed challenge to you directly within the "Time for New Material" thread.
  9. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    do you think you're avoiding the spam designation by adding your cutesy characters? :mrgreen: more spam! Please sir... CC Forum Rule #4. You will not post what is commonly called spam
  10. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    more spam! Please sir... CC Forum Rule #4. You will not post what is commonly called spam
  11. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    please sir... CC Forum Rule #4. You will not post what is commonly called spam
  12. waldo

    How the GW myth is perpetuated

    what are your examples of so-called wealth distribution... that have you so concerned. Do you have anything to qualify your statement on adaptation? Following your premise, do you anticipate a single adaptation will be required... or that multiple adaptations-upon-adaptations will be necessary...
  13. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    no - sorry --- no sir, YOU ARE THE BULLSHYTER! You refuse to answer the question/challenge put to you:
  14. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    no sir, YOU ARE THE BULLSHYTER! You refuse to answer the question/challenge put to you:
  15. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    no sir, YOU ARE THE BULLSHYTER! You refuse to answer the question/challenge put to you:
  16. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    it's a simple request... answer the question, take the challenge... quit deflecting! Sure you can
  17. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    answer the question... take the challenge... quit deflecting lapper!
  18. waldo

    IPCC Lead Author and the Nazca Vandalism

    as you claim... as you continue to claim. However, as before, as always, you refuse to answer the challenge that would allow you to substantiate that claim. As you've openly stated, you have NO REASON to have made the claim, and you believe you require NO REASON to have made the claim. NO...