Search results

Walter, don't be too hard on him... apparently, I validate his presence here! Why, if I wasn't here he'd have no posting contribution whatsoever. This way he gets to keep up his Tourette's shouting Bullshyte for, as he has self acknowledged, NO REASON... while dropping his furry pink bunny...

oh my... I leave for the day and you stop posting! I, I, I.... validate you... I validate your presence here! if I wasn't here you'd have no posting contribution whatsoever. This way you get to keep up your Tourette's shouting Bullshyte for, as you've self acknowledged, NO REASON... while...

don't be telling more porkies, hey petros! Per PMOD: hey petros, care to show a temp vs. TSI correlation... say something like this 1880-to-2009 graphic (Per SKS):

...hey furry bunny Tourette's guy! Take my challenge... what are you afraid of? Why do you keep asking the same question... do you also have OCD? I answered your question in the very post that member petros has chosen to play out his marginalization best against. I've only re-posted it a...

hey furry bunny Tourette's guy! Take my challenge... what are you afraid of?

xzx Tourette's DuhSleeper! :mrgreen: The guy who shouts Bullshyte for NO REASON! step up and check your Tourette's!!! :mrgreen: You stated you had NO REASON for making your claim... that you needed NO REASON for making your claim. And you're the guy throwing down a fuzzy bunny! You refuse to...

Tourette's DuhSleeper! :mrgreen: The guy who shouts Bullshyte for NO REASON! step up and check your Tourette's!!! :mrgreen: You stated you had NO REASON for making your claim... that you needed NO REASON for making your claim. And you're the guy throwing down a fuzzy bunny! You refuse to...

Tourette's DuhSleeper! :mrgreen: The guy who shouts Bullshyte for NO REASON! step up and check your Tourette's!!! :mrgreen: You stated you had NO REASON for making your claim... that you needed NO REASON for making your claim. And you're the guy throwing down a fuzzy bunny! You refuse to...

Tourette's DuhSleeper! :mrgreen: The guy who shouts Bullshyte for NO REASON!

strange your self-proclaimed 'statistician to the stars' didn't address the meat of the article... the change point analysis focus. Of course, your "stats guy" (err... McIntyre's stats guy, right) has been wrong several times over and had to eat his blogging humble pie, right Locutus?). In any...

sure Walter... that 90-year old geezer, industry shill, former mouthpiece for Big Tobacco, the guy who hasn't published anything directly atmospheric/space related since the late 60s, renowned denier... your kind of "expert", hey Walter? Sourcewatch has a fine accounting of all of Singer's...

absolute crap! There was no mainstream position in the 70s as you continue to claim. There have been studies done, meta studies, that have actually looked at all the related scientific publications of the period... and cataloged papers that took your claimed position, papers that were neutral...

go ahead, call bullshyte for, as you say, NO REASON! :mrgreen:

talking head? Buddy... I'm not initiating these points. I've made a concerted effort to attempt to NOT purposely post something first... I'm in total reaction mode to anything youse guys are posting. And I'm the talking head??? buddy... if I'm replying with talking points, replying to the C&P...

name a few of your claimed "dire predictions" that were made and didn't come true. Let's put a face/name to these so-called predictions you're wailing on about. Step up and support your statement.

:mrgreen: perfect! Yes, clearly, to you... you need no reason! You're a loyal lapper who chose to support your clubhouseBRO, member petros, for NO REASON. On what basis do you claim, as you say, "lying through his teeth"? You have no reason... and you repeat it, yet again! Perfect, NO BALLS...

what fairly "intelligent discussion" here? I've not seen any, not from the clubhouseBROs. Oh ya, there's a lot of C&P wizardry, a lot of back-slapping and high-fiving over your denial... there's a lot of that. But you guys just go all "goofy" when someone actually shows your BS for what it is...

the very fact you would make such a statement suggests exactly where your mindset is at. That 70s crap was not mainstream science... no matter how hard you deniers keep stating it. The typical predictions you deniers keep harping on, the failed ones... like what? Like a few guys making a...

what's wrong... you don't like a counter voice/opinion rustling your clubhouse? Clearly you guys can't handle anything that doesn't strictly line up with your overt denial! Pussies!

how is it "believable" to you? :mrgreen: You couldn't presume to support that article if your life depended on it... you gots no chops, lil' taxi! What makes it "believeable" to you, is that you likee anything that pumps your denial! That's it... that's your personal measuring bar! go with...