Search results

based on the misrepresentations that regularly come forward here, there can't have been any real/meaningful discussion. the long distant past has little to nothing to speak to in terms of the principal causal tie to today's relatively recent warming. in terms of policy intent, in terms of...

of course, Goddard absolutely knows this is a specious misrepresentation... and perhaps you do too. That "trick" was not a part of a formal journal publication (it was a magazine cover)... nor was it a "trick" in the way deniers presume to present it, to denigrate with reference to it... nor was...

yes, yes you are! How inspired can you be to continue to dip into the "Steve Goddard" twitter feed well? Again, the guy has absolutely no credibility and has been repeatedly debunked in his claims... again, how embarrassing does Goddard have to be for even a guy like Tony Willard Watts to cut...

as I recall your go-to C&P stable of blogs and twitter feeds, effectively, presents what you're labeling "DISSENT"; it represents nothing more than, typically, unsubstantiated claims put forward on denier blogs... to you, Blog Science Rules! To you, denier bloggers aren't required to formally...

if you actually bothered to review the clip, you would see your parroting of that twitter feed has no basis to what was shown in that clip. What is true, what was said, is that persons that received fossil-fuel industry funding purposely manipulated those emails by both taking them out of...

which certainly doesn't speak to any semblance of long-term feedback influence... let alone a true representation of shorter-term. Notwithstanding, of course, the so-called warming that still remains "in the pipe" and hasn't yet come forward to effect an impact on surface temperature. again...

you have yet to put forward anything to support your repeated claims that the BC carbon tax is a "disaster"... is a "sham". You have been repeatedly challenged to do so. In the thread that held detailed discussion on the BC carbon tax, many... many... positive critical reviews/assessments were...

geezaz! There's denier blogs... and then there's those SkyDragon idiots at Principa who presume to refute the Greenhouse Effect! This Locutus, is a new low... even for you! [/FONT][/COLOR]

no worries - thanks.

Lindzen is now retired/gone emeritus; aka "a gun for hire" to any denier interest/organization... his decades long past work gave him some chops; however, he repeatedly got debunked in his recent last decade work trying to substantiate his position for "the lowest of the low climate...

"natural"??? No, the principal causal tie, the burning of anthropogenic sourced fossil-fuels, is anything but your stated "natural"! And again, still waiting on you to provide your correlation between your targeted period of past warming and today's relatively recent warming... still waiting...

please sir! Stop your porkies. Per PAGES 2k reconstruction: Green dots show the 30-year average of the new PAGES 2k reconstruction. The red curve shows the global mean temperature, according HadCRUT4 data from 1850 onwards. In blue is the original hockey stick of Mann, Bradley and Hughes...

'official' per the first of the four major datasets (JMA) to have released 2014 year-end data:

Walter... I thought it was called GLOBAL warming... not 48 contiguous U.S. states warming??? ... with 2014 set to become the warmest year within the instrumental GLOBAL surface temperature record evah!

such intellectual prowess! :mrgreen:

that sun thingee didn't work out so well for you in that recent post of yours... care to ever... ever, support your continued claim that "it's the SUN"? Ever? and every one of those links ties back to a denier blog/denier... notwithstanding that's the infamous ENSO 97/98 cherry-pick...

no - "climate change" has been in the vernacular for some time..... uhhh, see IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)... founded in 1988! and if, as you say, "I disparaged that graphic" that would line up with everything I've repeatedly posted on your failed attempts to make something...

huh Walter??? Say what! From the same sources??? The only Antarctic graphs I recall are:- you continually trying to make something out of the increase in Antarctic sea-ice extent - the images I've put forward showing the normal/typical yearly melt of Antarctic sea-ice extent... almost to its...

oh Locutus you.... melting trend images (extent & volume) from NSIDC, PIOMAS, SKS

it's called the instrumental record... when did you think it started? That baseline period follows a recommendation from the WMO (World Meteorological Organization) which suggests using the latest decade to compile a 30 year average. It also allows a more representative comparison between the...