Search results

good on ya Walter! That's one contributing factor... see also ozone levels decreasing over the Antarctic with an accompanying increase in the strength of cyclonic winds, in turn, creating polynyas (open water areas) that freeze to increase sea-ice. Increasing Antarctic Sea Ice under Warming...

really, you were asked... to ask me - care to provide a copy of that ask, with proper time notation? Is this your way of avoiding those pointed questions you keep dodging about the Holocene Optimum correlation to today's warming? Is this your latest dodge? as for your public domain copyright...

please sir... per CC rules, you have not properly provided a linked reference to your "layman" quotation! Please do so :mrgreen: my gawd man! Are you an alarmist... all that lube at the bottom... aren't those ice-sheets just going to fall into the sea? So... none of the melting... none... is...

that's one way to deny/minimize the loss of Antarctic ice mass! Since you have such a qualified opinion on that, what's causing that Antarctic... or Arctic... ice mass/volume melting loss?

right! You've never tried to flog the warming of the Holocene Optimum... you've never mentioned it... evah! Is that your new position? here Walter... try this one... perhaps it will finally allow you to "get it". You know, before you try to once again flog Antarctic sea-ice extent:

says the guy who perpetually flogs the Holocene Optimum as some significant indicator to relate to today's relatively recent warming... what are YOU, as you say, "clinging to" there? Any chance you might take a stab, finally, in clarifying why you repeatedly refer to the Holocene Optimum... and...

of course! That's why I'm forever pointing out the idiocy of those that continue to beat the drum over Antarctic sea ice extent... notwithstanding, after stating it numerous times and showing the same/like melt vs. freeze seasonal change graphic, they still insist upon barking over Antarctic...

that's some harsh labeling for Walter's misguided denier passion!

:mrgreen: nope, not caught at anything! You on the other hand have been caught lapping and desperately trying to A-N-A-L-Y parse an inconsequential and benign statement... all to support one of the clubhouse BRO's!!! anyway, go for the last post cause I've got to start making dinner - CULater

damn... that's a lotta red shaded colouring in this pic, hey Locutus?

weak even by your standards! So... you now want to claim that it adds to the veracity of my other statement that spoke of an outlet for locals to make some money... which, in itself, was simply a reply to another member who questioned why any local Peruvians might get involved to support any...

stupid? Sir, isn't that inflamatory labeling? Maybe I'll put up a pic when member 'petros' apologizes for labeling me a LIAR for "his KNOWING semantic interpretation"... and puts up his own pic, hey!

and now we have the standard mob-rule... aided and abetted by a board moderator! :mrgreen: yes, hey now, you are a POSER!

hey genius... what did my anecdote about traveling to the Machu Picchu site actually bring forward to the point that it would even be worthy of a challenge questioning it's authenticity? Considering the whole stoopid petros nonsense has been centered on "the BUSES and the ROAD" to the site NOT...

no - I wasn't caught at anything! On the other hand you were caught tangled in your weave of "your knowing semantics"! You sir, you should man-up and acknowledge you wigged out at the most inconsequential and benign statement... to which you went off the rails with your "LYING LIAR" routine...

you know... you just know! You just know that when I stated "bus trips dumping tourists on the site daily"... you just knew I wasn't actually referring to the bus trips that travel to the site daily... even though that's exactly what I stated. You just knew! And your lapsquad of DuhSleeper and...

based on what? Because you feel such a need to assist one of your failing BRO's? :mrgreen: these simple words, that's all it took for OCD petros to have a meltdown... for you and Cappy to come runnin' to his side!!! Don't you feel embarrassed to do such a thing... don't you feel embarrassed for...

the streaker thing has died off... would that be the 20-25 minute BUS SHUTTLE up to the site... following the ROAD up to the site? How can that be when you've been so adamant that there are NO BUSES and there is no ROAD to the Machu Picchu site?

name the lie, or as member DuhSleeper says:

that you're a LYING LIAR? Yes, it's a fact as clearly outlined in your imploding OCD charade!