Search results

when your case is predicated on your outright refusal to be specific in anything... yes, you should rest "your case" of non-specificity!

when all you've got is prattle about "religion, truther, shill, globull, industry, born again"... are you really looking for discussion or an avenue for you to showcase your overt denial? I've seen the representations of "facts" being pedaled around here... denier facts that reflect upon nothing...

and how does this rise to the level of your initial statement and my resultant request (quoted above)... for you to relate an example of your claimed prior "willingness" to be definitive now usurped by a position/statement no longer providing definitiveness? Unless a representative example can...

no - you've been specifically non-specific! This exchange started out somewhat 'cordial'... when you've been asked for specificity, you suddenly reverted to the comfort of your "religion/truther" labeling. Is there a problem?

another case in point! I simply ask for a clarification on what "it" constitutes... and no, I certainly won't/wouldn't ignore anything forthcoming. If warranted, in my view, I would certainly test the veracity of your statement/claim... if you ever actually state something specific! Reverting to...

again, you are "non-specific"... why?

it's your choice to continue derailing threads... I will certainly oblige you in your continuing quest to show just how far you're prepared to go to attempt to marginalize someone. Your choice. who is your "they"... do you have an example of your "they" previously providing a, as you say...

an example of a 12th month moving average for global surface temperature over the last 100 years... the full Daily Mail article that is mentioned in member Locutus' twitter reference... usually this tabloid rag get's it wrong; in this case, the article is somewhat accurate.

that's right Locutus... your referenced agenda driven blogging hydrologist has struck a killer shot at the science behind the finding of increasing ocean acidification. Apparently, all these following world-wide national academies of science will have to retract their endorsement of the 'global...

Breitbart!!! :mrgreen: Locutus, you must think you have a real winner here... this is at least the 3rd time you've posted on this particular item now. Just because you pick a different denier blog/shyte-house rag each time, does that give you the latitude to... simply repeat the same schlock...

you'll need to first define what "it" is... it seems most of those objecting to "something", rarely, if ever, actually state definitively, absolutely, precisely..... just what it is they're so objecting to! from that thread discussing the BC carbon tax, I recall a few critical statements about...

what lies from the IPCC? There were much hyped report corrections (~4 legitimate changes) associated with the AR4 WG2 'social sciences' sub-report... none of these reflected upon the actual physical sciences. These report corrections did not reflect on any official IPCC statements/positions...

please provide examples of your described "what has been found wanting" - thanks in advance.

you're incapable of recognizing a distinction between the science and presumed purveyors of "self-interest"? a constant theme in your posts is one of a presumed "economy wrecking"... in this latest case you speak of "complete destruction of our economy". You also liberally throw around the...

nothing to say about the actual purposeful action of the denier 'Wallace'... and he most definitely is as I've caught up on his overall history. To me, nothing is more telling about his motive/agenda, than to read that linked reference I provided to the Jan, 2014 entry he wrote in his own blog...

and just "who/what" are legitimate examples of persons/groups putting forward such "proposals"... and what actual credence, if any, do they have in this regard? Of course, legitimate proposals recognize fossil-fuels will be a part of the mix, but propose a diminishing reliance on fossil-fuels...

the related article/paper as published within the journal 'Oceanography'... inclusive of detailed chemistry and a related (data sourced) table of "average concentrations of carbon system parameters and temperature-and-salinity values for surface waters of the major ocean basins based on the...

with your admittance that you have NO REASON and REQUIRE NO REASON for your repeated charge of lying towards me, you've openly acknowledged your charge is baseless. Alternatively, the other member you simply chose to follow remains steadfast and refuses to rescind his charge; accordingly:in...

I expect in the sequence of posts, your post has implications targeted towards me; in that regard: please - my request is intended to help bring a semblance of, IMHO, increased respectful order to the board. I trust you would agree that the use of blatant insults and inflammatory language is...

I expect in the sequence of posts, your post is targeted towards me; in that regard: please member petros - my request is intended to help bring a semblance of, IMHO, increased respectful order to the board. I trust you would agree that the use of blatant insults and inflammatory language is...