Condi tells Arabs to help Palestinians.

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
US rebuke over Palestinian funds

Ms Rice was careful not to pinpoint individual Arab states for criticism

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has implied Arab states could do more to help the Palestinians.
Without singling out specific Arab states for criticism, Ms Rice said they should focus on how much they can do - not how little - for the Palestinians.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7379066.stm
----------------------------------------------------------
She is absolutely right! Those oil-rich Gulf States should help their brothers and sisters.
I know they already have millions of refugees to take care of, but that is peanuts!
Why do the Palestinians need help anyway? Don't they have enough land to feed themselves? And Israel already provides them with free electricity!! What's the problem, I wonder?
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
My understanding is that there is a lot of prejudice toward Palestinians from the Arab and Persian world.
 

FUBAR

Electoral Member
May 14, 2007
249
6
18
Probably guilty consciences for telling them to move out of the way while they wipe Israel off the map then flubbing it so many times.........
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Walter

An elitist token black who has a super-tanker named after her for when she worked for Exxon... and a moronic Texan from Crawford....

What at team!
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Man Rice is U'ckin F'ugly.... like she fell from the ugly tree and smacked every branch on the way down.

Then again, maybe she just needs to learn what a smile is.

Of course her comments about getting the Arab States to help out Pal is kinda hypocritical considdering those running the place they considder are terrorists, and if they help out terrorists, then they're contributing to terrorism by their standards and then they can be invaded by the US...... of course they're going to help, just watch them jump to the plate (Yeah Right)

All that is needed is one of these states to send in money or supplies and then Israel or the US finds some way of tracking those supplies and resources going into terrorist hands by whatever method they can find (intentional or indirectly) and then that Arab country in question would be the next Iran on the chopping block for the US.

I'm not suprised any of them are not helping anymore then they already are.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
I fully support Canada's position regarding funding belligerent organizations like the democratically elected Hamas. Canada and Canadians should not help people kill each other or take sides in disputes (unless that activity serves Canada's interests.) While Hamas does have many legitmate causes like building schools, hospitals, mosques, housing... they also use charitable donations to buy arms.

While many other countries allow individuals to make donations to Hamas, it is illegal for Canadians to make donations to Hamas or belligerent organizations on the side of Palestinians.

Unfortunately Canada does not have a balanced approach to this conflict because it is legal for Canadians to make donations to help the belligerents on the other side of this conflict. It is legal in Canada to make donations to organizations which help Israel's government ethnically cleanse Palestine of Palestinians, buy arms for killing civilians and impose a crippling economic blockade.

Essentially our government has taken sides in this dispute and as a result actively supports Israel's activities which have been condemned by the UN General Assembly repeatedly as violations of the UN Charter, international laws, treaties and conventions.

All official aid to Gaza, must go through Israel. Lately Israel has imposed an econmic blockade on Gaza. Most food aid and humanitarian aid is not getting into Gaza. As a result many Gazans are suffering chronic shortages of food and medicine.

If you want to know more about the current humanitarian crisis in Gaza, please read this recent document by a coalition of Non-Government Organizations in Gaza.

http://www.wiamep.org/resources/GazaStrip-HumanitarianImplosionMar08.pdf

The end of the document has a contact which can help Canadians wanting to make legal donations organizations which assist Gazans. By the way, these organizations do not take sides in his dispute and are only interested in providing humanitarian assistance.

Another note, Canada has also cut most of its aid to Gaza and is guilty of contributing to this man-made humanitarian disaster. We should be ashamed.
 

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
Man Rice is U'ckin F'ugly.... like she fell from the ugly tree and smacked every branch on the way down.

Then again, maybe she just needs to learn what a smile is.

Of course her comments about getting the Arab States to help out Pal is kinda hypocritical considdering those running the place they consider are terrorists, and if they help out terrorists, then they're contributing to terrorism by their standards and then they can be invaded by the US...... of course they're going to help, just watch them jump to the plate (Yeah Right)

All that is needed is one of these states to send in money or supplies and then Israel or the US finds some way of tracking those supplies and resources going into terrorist hands by whatever method they can find (intentional or indirectly) and then that Arab country in question would be the next Iran on the chopping block for the US.

I'm not suprised any of them are not helping anymore then they already are.
Hi, Praxi, you have such clear perceptions and sharp logic.... I never thought along those lines. What a perfect trap set for the Arabs to walk into!!
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Don't bite the hand that feeds you:

$50 billion later, taking stock of US aid to Egypt
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak meets with President Bush Sunday in Crawford, Texas.

By Charles Levinson | Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor

CAIRO –
Amid fresh fighting by US forces in Iraq, Sunday's meeting between Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and President Bush at his Texas ranch serves as a reminder of America's deep involvement in this other key Arab nation.

Aid is central to Washington's relationship with Cairo. The US has provided Egypt with $1.3 billion a year in military aid since 1979, and an average of $815 million a year in economic assistance. All told, Egypt has received over $50 billion in US largesse since 1975.

The money is seen as bolstering Egypt's stability, support for US policies in the region, US access to the Suez Canal, and peace with Israel. But some critics question the aid's effectiveness in spurring economic and democratic development in the Arab world's most populous country - a higher US priority after Sept. 11, 2001.


"Aid offers an easy way out for Egypt to avoid reform," says Edward Walker, the US ambassador to Egypt from 1994 to 1998. "They use the money to support antiquated programs and to resist reforms."

Egypt's economy is deeply troubled. Unemployment has climbed to 25 percent, foreign investment last year dropped to a 20-year low, and until recently the currency was losing value on a weekly basis. Rather than helping, American aid is "depressing the need for reform," according to former Ambassador Walker.

Meanwhile, the Mubarak regime is inching towards political reform and democratic pluralism at a pace so slow that many question the sincerity of the government's pro-democracy rhetoric.

In the past, issues like democracy and economic reform were of secondary concern to policymakers looking to shore up a friendly government. Support for Egypt jumped after it made peace with Israel in 1979.

However, US policy has changed since 19 hijackers demonstrated that bolstering stable, pro-American, but undemocratic regimes in the Middle East affected America's security. The ringleader and four of the 9/11 hijackers were Egyptian.

In 2002, the US National Security Strategy articulated a new aid doctrine, saying that money should go to "countries whose governments rule justly, invest in their people, and encourage economic freedom."

Colin Powell's Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) is refocusing funding priorities in the Middle East - including those at USAID's 300 person Cairo office - on economic reform, democracy, education, and women's issues.

"We're shifting our emphases to reflect changes in US foreign policy," said Ken Ellis, the director of USAID Egypt.

USAID is a government-to-government economic assistance program. It operates on the premise that economic development will spur democratic development. In the words of Mr. Ellis, "There is a correlation between strong, vibrant, open economies, and a strong, vibrant, open political system."

But many say that USAID needs to alter its approach if it is going to push successfully for substantive reform in Egypt. Ismail Sabry Abdallah is the former Egyptian minister of development and planning, and negotiated the first USAID contract on behalf of Egypt in 1974.

Now an independent economist, Abdallah says USAID needs to decrease support for the Egyptian government, and increase its support for civil society in order to realize the sort of economic and political reforms that the United States and the Egyptian people desire.

"[USAID] is distributed by the Egyptian government in an anarchic way, through personal contacts and political influence," Abdallah says.

Each year USAID gives $200 million to the Egyptian government in cash handouts to do with as it pleases. The money is theoretically conditional upon economic reforms in problem areas such as deregulation, privatization, and free trade.

Top recipients of US aid each year
Iraq - In 2004, it will become the largest recipient of US aid, receiving $18.4 billion.
Israel - The largest recipient of US largesse in 2003, getting $2.1 billion in military aid annually; $600 million in economic aid.
Egypt - Out of a US foreign aid budget of about $14 billion in 2003, Egypt was the second largest recipient with $1.3 billion in military aid; $615 million for social programs.
Colombia - Got $540 million to battle the drug trade, and local terrorist groups.
Jordan - Got $250 million in economic support; $198 in military financing.
Peru, Ukraine, Russia - Received approximately $200 million each in economic and military aid annually.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0412/p07s01-wome.html

Money like this buys influence...
 

normbc9

Electoral Member
Nov 23, 2006
483
14
18
California
The Arab states all despise the US and why would one of our Cabinet members ever get the idea that telling those Arab states to help the Palestineans out would ever begin to listen? None of them have any intention of getting involved for fear that the elements in the Palestinean Refugee Camps would seek residency in their nations. They don't want trouble and the Palestineans are regarded as a threat to their individual security. But more importatly why would they ever rush to follow any US originated order?
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
For whatever reasons and it's far easier to imagine unscrupulous nefarious manipulation as the most genuine reason, the United States of Unrelenting Greed provides foreign aid to states throughout the region........Why?

Perhaps it's to keep the pot simmering......

Condi Rice should spend her time fixing the avalanche of crap that's troubling the United States and maybe that'd be far more positive on everyone else's condition and circumstance in the world than flapping her gums about what everyone else should be doing.

America should simply cut-off "aid" to every region in the area, no more money, no more weapons, stay the hell out of other people's business and accept that nations have a right to succeed or fail based on their own behaviour decisions and actions.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
The Arab states all despise the US and why would one of our Cabinet members ever get the idea that telling those Arab states to help the Palestineans out would ever begin to listen? None of them have any intention of getting involved for fear that the elements in the Palestinean Refugee Camps would seek residency in their nations. They don't want trouble and the Palestineans are regarded as a threat to their individual security. But more importatly why would they ever rush to follow any US originated order?
------------------------------------------normbc9------------------------------------------------------------

Very true.

We all know the Arab wealth has not been used to help their Palestinian brothers.
We also know the Arabs know the Palestinian society is so sick it would turn on any hand that feeds them.

We learn this in Al-anon. Often the person who is sicker is not the alchoholic but the person in the vicinity of that alcoholic.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
LOL.

Maybe it's not that funny, but I guess the answer to this pop quiz is : The United States of America.

However, there are many enablers in the whole Arab region. Many in the Arab world want to keep the pot boiling.

Everyone is afraid to speak the truth and too wary to do what is right, because there are many committed to destroy any chance for peace.
 
Last edited:

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
If a group of heavily armed immigrants came to your town and set up shop in the middle of your town's center would you be happy? If the armed immigrants began terrorizing the locals by committing acts of rape, torture and murder in order to purify your town of unbelievers, would you object? When the refugees displaced by the armed immigrants show up on your doorstep would you give them shelter? If the immigrants declared independance and began expanding their borders by conquering parts of your neighborhood, would you fight back?

Explain again why Israel's neighbors are responsible for fixing problems created by Zionists immigrants on a mission from God to purify the holylands of non-Jews.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
EAO

I hear what you're saying but how is this condition served...addressed by funding everyone involved? What possibility of peaceful negotiations can proceed when the next shipment of missiles and high-tech munitions is on its way? It would be fair to suggest that other interests...Russia China.... might perhaps be playing a more robust role in continuing the conflicts of the region if the U.S. of A dramatically reduced its "foreign-aid"...but why not let nature take its course? If the U.S. stopped funnelling money into the region (to all nations) what would be the most likely outcome?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
The Arab states all despise the US...

It would be more accurate to say that most Arabs and Muslims dislike American foreign policy.

US foreign policy supports brutal dictatorships like the ones in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. (See post above) These unstable governments would likely be overthrown if the US cut economic and military aid to these countries.


Other countries which would likely fall without US support include Iraq, Kuwait and Jordan.

But the biggest problem Arabs and Muslims have with the US is their support for Israel. They know that when they are attacked by Israel, most of Israel's arms are made in the US and paid for with American tax dollars.

Rice holds back as U.S. rushes bombs to Israel

By DAVID S. CLOUD and HELENE COOPER
The New York Times

Published: Saturday, July 22, 2006

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.

The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran's efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah...

http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060722/WIRE/60722009/1117/news


UN denounces Israel cluster bombs

Cluster bombs are causing injuries and deaths daily, the UN says


The UN's humanitarian chief has accused Israel of "completely immoral" use of cluster bombs in Lebanon. UN clearance experts had so far found 100,000 unexploded cluster bomblets at 359 separate sites, Jan Egeland said...

...
Earlier this week the US state department launched an inquiry into whether Israel misused US-made cluster bombs in Lebanon during the conflict. A senior White House official told the BBC that the investigation would focus on whether US-made weapons were used against non-military targets...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5299938.stm

Here are photos of US tax dollars at work in the middle east:

Lebanon 2006

Rescuers evacuate dead and wounded from Halat bridge in the Christian hearland, destroyed August 4, 2006


Plumes of smoke and dust rise after an Israeli hit on appartment buildings in Southern beirut, July 2006


Aitaroun, Southern Lebanon - destruction after an Israeli missile


Qana, Southern Lebanon, July 2006 after an Isreali missile killed 50 people
The stench of death: Children hold their noses as they pass corpses in a truck

http://www.habeeb.com/lebanon.photos.18.beirut.war.destruction.html


BBC

In southern Beirut, hit hard by 10 days of Israeli air strikes, the scale of destruction in once-vibrant suburbs is becoming clear.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/06/middle_east_beirut_destruction/html/1.stm

Why Arabs and Muslims dislike US foreign policy shouldn't be a mystery to anyone.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
US foreign policy supports brutal dictatorships like the ones in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. (See post above) These unstable governments would likely be overthrown if the US cut economic and military aid to these countries.
----------------------------------------earth_as_one-----------------------------------------------

Isn't it ironic ?

Isn't it ironic that brutal dictatorships when deposed show you that the anarchy or the dogmatism that will reign to replace such dictatorships seems even more dangerous and volatile ?

They need a leader like that one in Dubai, to raise the wealth and health and productivity of their people.

Dogmatism of a theocracy won't do it. Democracy won't do it. Dictatorship won't do it.