Comments from a REMF (rear echelon mother f*****) should be taken with a grain of salt. I'm sure if it had been a grunt with boots on the ground who had been interviewed, they would have praised the NATO troops, all of them.
That being said, I was surprised to see you guys' reactions to criticism of your military...
It's so common-place for us, that I almost wondered why you guys were getting so upset, but then I remembered that you guys are more used to dishing it out than you are to receiving it.
Don't worry, you get used to it. There comes a point when you'll realize the people who mattered, those who matter now, and those who never did, or will.
In all fairness Gates has retracted all the statements that were credited to him apparently in error. He has come out in high praise of Canadian and other allied troops.
Does Mr Gates recall some little guys called "Viet Cong"? Fighting shadows and ghosts hasn't got any easier.Mr. Gates complained about soldiers from Canada, Britain and the Netherlands not knowing how to fight a guerrilla insurgency.
Exactly. They LOVE to hear critisism about the US. Thrive on it. Roll in it.
But can they take it when they are critisized... well see above posts!
I think they need to work on their foreign relations skills
I'll take this one:
When I was growing up back in the 80's, I hated the US because of their "We so Great" attitude. But... I wasn't overly bothered by it, because you guys ligitamatly had reason to be proud of yourselves.
But now you're country is a joke, a sham, and since you know who got into power, the entire country has crumbled into a shell of your former self, all the while you guys continue to spout "We so Great" when clearly you guys are not.
Your country used to be great.... it's not anymore. Look in the mirror for once.
Now as it goes towards critisism of Canada and our troops? I can take plenty.... when it's actually true.
Tell me something?
You guys invaded Afghanistan a while back, and then invaded Iraq.... neither are resolved, NATO had to come through and clean up your guys' damn mess.... YET AGAIN.
And the fact that you guys didn't finish the job that you started to begin with, and for you guys to turn around and bad mouth your allies for actually helping you in your stupid unjust invasions of sovrign countries not related to 9/11.... you guys sure have a lot of friggin ignorant nerve. Seems a bit hypocritical to point the fingers at your allies for not getting the job done, when you guys never got it done either.... besides the fact your country never bothered to plan a method of pull out of either war. Bravo..... bow to the experts.
Must have something to do with that failing education system you have down there.
Well I see how it has been ingrained in generation after generation. In other words you are telling me you have been brainwashed.
We still are a great country no matter how many of you try to tell us we are not.
If you call the invasion of Afghanistan unjust then you clearly are not able to think rationally and follow world events outside of CC and Information Clearing House.
NATO had to clean up our mess? Have they? Is it over? :lol: It's a war. NATO came in because it is in the treaty. A treaty for a Cold War that we burdened under as you sat cozily. During NATO's illegal invasion of Yugoslavia it was American airpower that had to come in and clean that mess.
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/history/50170-hunt-oil-manifest-destiny-new.htmlTell us again why we're thier bear, I forget. Was it to save poppys?" MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" Now we can attack Pakistan with Uncle Scam.
Love the sig Gh.Give me a frickin break...what we have here is an american, once again, shooting his mouth off and bad mouthing the Canadian contribution to helping THEIR ass, along with bad mouthing the rest of the american allies.
What his problem...... Canadians not killing enough civilians for the american liking?
Well... I dunno. Seems to me there's at least a grain of truth in Gates' remarks. NATO spent almost 50 years preparing for a Soviet invasion of Western Europe across the plains of what used to be East Germany. Tactics, weapons, doctrine, intel, training, were all focused on that. Counter insurgency, or guerrilla warfare, or whatever you want to call it, is very different. The enemy is elusive, doesn't appear in massed battle groups, sneaks around behind you, subverts the civilian population... This is a very unconventional war, conventional methods don't work. Isn't it possible that that's all he meant? I haven't seen a detailed report on what he actually said yet, only what I've been able to get from CBC Radio news reports and interviews, some of them admittedly with Pentagon spin doctors who aren't to be trusted.
I think I'll wait to see what the Globe&Mail and CBC report tomorrow before saying anything more.
We already realize that you don't matter, but you don't realize that.
Apparently "we" doesn't include you since you responded....
Are you able to verify that statement with some references? To me that is a totally new thought. I happen to come from Germany and know, that Russia would have taken over West-Germany as well, given the opportunity. The West-Germans were glad the allies were there to prevent that from happening. They feared the Russians far more than the Brits and Americans.Recent historical scholarship refutes strongly any invasion threat by Soviets aimed at Europe.
It has been understood that the overwhelming evidence supports the theory of maintenance of A/ military industrial sales and developement B/ the boggyman of Soviet influence in the developing world.
Islamic terrorism was created by the Americans. That I can see easily and also find enough written about it. Boogeyman's purpose is pretty clear, as is llustrated in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is always countries with rich resources and/or strategic locations. Russia forinstance is getting worried about being soon totally surrounded by American military bases! :roll:In other words the entire cold war was a diversion while Uncle Sam raped pillaged and destroyed socialism on every continent on earth, and continues to do so with the new boggyman of Islamic Terrorism, a threat that does not exist except in the minds of those to lazy to read about it's history.
Not just money, also power and control, but actually those two come with money.Counter insurgency or counter terrorism is and has been the main work of American forces for over forty years, this matter is heavily documented by literally tons of documented evidence. Every campaign fought in over fifty years was aimed at civilian infrastructure and governments for the purpose of American corporate expansion, no threat ever existed to America, only to American and western corporations. It was all done for money and nothing else.
Yes, it has spread and that's why we have an American Empire now... a big monster! Perhaps it is not so bad to have Harper as PM!:smile:Todays situation is different only in scale and scope of operation.
Exactly! It's draining their strength. Besides, most Americans don't support that war anymore.Gates said exactly what he thought, they are desperate that Nato Allies engage more fully in the conquest, fearing the inevitable defeat.
European citizens will not allow fuller engagement of their forces. Europeans have been reluctant participants thus far, this accounts for the poor turnout and lead feet.
Do you think they would do that? I don't! China, Russia, North Korea and Hugo Chavez personally would come down on them!!There is no practical way for the coalition forces in Afghanistan or Iraq to extract victory, they are bogged down in protracted guarilla warfare which they cannot win unless they sweep the area clean with chemical and biological agents.
Well, in that case... Cheers, Beaver:lol:You will recall that nothing is off the table. What has been removed for a long time is the chance for total victory by the coalition, something they knew, if they didn't achieve early, would never come. Neither the people of Iraq nor the Afghans will ever be defeated without the employment of WMDs in addition to the napalm, phosphor bombs, cluster bombs, depleted urainium and other illegal weapons. Canada, if we don't get out, will be involved in the break-up of Pakistan, for no good reason other than the service to our imperial masters.