Not true, wtc 7 was too far away from wtc to be damaged as much as you say, the deutch bank was just beside wtc 2, and was still standing with no problem at all, try harder.
9/11 conspiracy debate
- Thread starter Toro
- Start date
Not true, wtc 7 was too far away from wtc to be damaged as much as you say, the deutch bank was just beside wtc 2, and was still standing with no problem at all, try harder.
You believe that hologram explodes immediatly? :hello2:
Think about it, try an hologram, and just try to break it, tell me when you are done.:roll:
The truth is out there. It will be silently released from some obscure library in around 25 years - when all the principals are either deceased or too old to stand trial. Maybe by then, someone will have developed something to erase black magic marker....
Wolf
Wolf
Last edited:
Hey Illogic 7, here's a picture of Fiterman Hall (The Building I was in BTW on that day), you know where this building is? BEHIND WTC 7, see the damage?
Fiterman Hall is a 15 story building BEHIND WTC 7 (a 48 story building) in relation to the North tower.
Comments?
Sorry to tell you this, but a conspiracy theory, is when there is absotly no evidence, just like the 19 hijackers that was able to do their magic trick on 9-11
This is what is written on the fbi web site , regarding Ussama bin laden.
CAUTION
Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.
reward Usama bin laden
So tell me, on what fairy tail evidence do you base that alqueada was behind 9-11?
I posted pictures of "holographic debris" of the airplanes, but you refused to comment. Why?
How do you take that narrow little mind out for walks on a windy day? Where have I ever said those planes were not hijacked and flown into WTC? I challenge you here and now to search and post it in letters big enough to eat.
Where have I named anybody in the take-down - whether it be pulled or an actual failure and collapse - of those buildings?
If I am a conspiracist for not believing in the supreme stupidity of your great US Air Force in allowing two clear and present dangers to enter NYC airspace, so be it. Blinders and stupid obedience. Do you poop when Georgie says it's okay too?
Wolf
You haven't watched ANY of the videos of the collapses, have you. That would be the only way to explain how you don't get it.
...well, ok, not the ONLY way, but we'll keep it polite!
Watch the videos of the collapses, you will have visual proof of how WTC7 took more debris than Deutchesbank. Just luck of the draw maybe, maybe because WTC1 fell from higher up and had a wider debris radius? Don't know, but the video evidence is clear.
I'm surprised that the more simple conspiracy isn't taken up by the nutters. It's much more plausible that the administration was either willfully ignorant, or letting sh!t slide for a war. There certainly appears to be more than enough warning. I'm not saying either way, but I think this line of reasoning holds more water than such a grand pyrotechnics display out of Hollywood. Tom Clancy I'm sure could write a script like that.
Edit: Not so much surprising as more logical, but lack of logic should surprise no one in a 9/11 thread...
Edit: Not so much surprising as more logical, but lack of logic should surprise no one in a 9/11 thread...
Wally
Thanks for that beautiful descriptive..... is it yours - is it copyrighted? LOLOL
Allowing (American) commercial airliners ALREADY in US airspace is supreme stupidity?
I think you should rephrase that.
Once those aircraft deviated from their flightplans, they became rogue - even if they were on their ways to Mars. Did you miss the words "CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER"? No need to rephrase.
Wolf
Wolf
Well if you say so.
So what you're implying is that the US government intentionally permitted the planes to hit the targets, all except one (Pennsylvania) for what reason?
Well you woldn't, which makes me wonder why you believe two planes were permitted to hit their targets and one wasn't. Let's think common sense. What possible reason could there be, as absurd as it may sound?
This is a silly argument.
The reason why the FBI has not put 9/11 on Osama's Most Wanted profile is because what he did was an act of war, not a criminal act. Besides, every other department is looking for him, so what's the point?
Okay... Let's think common sense. Why would an air force, who can detect a sparrow fart at two hundred miles, miss two Boeing 767's and two Boeing 757's (all of whom have deviated from their flightplans, gone missing from radar, returned to radar - with inappropritate transponder squawks, and have verbally reported hijackings via company two-way comminications) that are heading toward New York and Washington?
Believe me, if I knew - I would be cutting myself in on their action.
Wolf
Believe me, if I knew - I would be cutting myself in on their action.
Wolf
And how many other times in US flight history had the airforce been summoned when a plane deviated from its intended path?
It does happen occasionally.