The Near future for Americans

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Christ Smack WW111s already been a go for years, how come nobody told you. Don't you remember your brainless leader telling you the war on terrorism would take decades. What the hell did you think he was talking about? I'm dead certain that your next president will be just as funny as the Bush weed, Ya wanna know why? Because the same dummys will still be voting. hahahahahahahahahahahhaha

Oh I get it now. So because the world is not involved in a true World War as you lefties predicted and time is running short for the Bush Administration... any war will have to do?

Admitting mistakes is just NOT the way the left does it... I must continue to remind myself.

You liberals MUST redefine what a World War is to twist it to fit your dillusional thinking and views.
 

thomaska

Council Member
May 24, 2006
1,509
37
48
Great Satan
Oh I get it now. So because the world is not involved in a true World War as you lefties predicted and time is running short for the Bush Administration... any war will have to do?

Admitting mistakes is just NOT the way the left does it... I must continue to remind myself.

You liberals MUST redefine what a World War is to twist it to fit your dillusional thinking and views.

Just remember to screenshot this post and save it somewhere. Just in case Armageddon does not descend upon us, and Bush is out of office, and the ice caps haven't melted, it will be a fun one to come back to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Just remember to screenshot this post and save it somewhere. Just in case Armageddon does not descend upon us, and Bush is out of office, and the ice caps haven't melted, it will be a fun one to come back to.

I would but if I did that it would mean that I would believe that the dellusional left would have some integrity to admit fault or error. It is just not in their nature.
 

Sparrow

Council Member
Nov 12, 2006
1,202
23
38
Quebec
I wear traditional glasses but they tint according to the intensity of the light. So I am all set no matter what happens.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Sound familiar?

The Burning of the Reichstag: What We Know Today

By Abel Ashes

One of the most often cited instances of agents of government conducting a terrorist spectacle against their own institutions for propaganda effect is that of the burning of the German Parliament building, also known as the Reichstag, on February 27th 1933. This was the event which provided the excuse that the Nazi Party needed to transform Germany into a militarized dictatorship.

The Reichstag fire was officially attributed to a nearly blind Dutch communist radical named Marinus van der Lubbe who was arrested in the Reichstag building as it burned. Adolph Hitler and the top Nazi leadership alleged a widespread communist conspiracy was responsible for the act of arson and used this fraudulent assertion to justify their subsequent acts of constitutional and human treason.

However, even before the Reichstag Fire Trial in Leipzig, the Legal Commission of the International Investigation Committee had reached the conclusion that Nazi agents had set fire to the Reichstag and that van der Lubbe was innocent of the crime. In 1945, failing to produce evidence linking any communist but van der Lubbe to the crime, the Nazi Government settled for an official story starring Marinus van der Lubbe as sole perpetrator. Of course by then the Nazis had already successfully used the fictional widespread communist arson threat to suppress opposition to their murderous ambitions at home and abroad.

In 1990 50,000 pages of original German court, government, and Gestapo documents pertaining to the Reichstag fire that had been hidden away for decades in Moscow and East Berlin, were finally made available for review. Historian Alexander Bahar and physicist and psychologist Wilfried Kugel spent years meticulously reviewing the documents before...

http://www.abelashes.com/page4.html

How about this?

"Why, of course, the people don't want war," Goering shrugged. "Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."

"There is one difference," I pointed out. "In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars."
"Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.htm