Is the U.S. Insolvent

Albertabound

Electoral Member
Sep 2, 2006
555
2
18
A bank run occurs because they don't have all the money at the bank.

Not only do they not have it at the bank......they just don't have it. Period.
If a bank has $100 in it to begin with, it can now loan out $1000. Fractional Reserve Banking.
When you take out a loan for $1000 you are creating $1000 out of thin air, by creating debt. Hard to fathom i know.

Government debt is $8 trillion and private debt is something like $10 trillion.

the debt in 8 trillion true enough, however that does not include interest. Would anyone like to figure out what the interest compounded daily would be on that. Remember the Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank. It is neither federal or does it have the reserve of the trillions of dollars it has loaned out. It only has a..........."fraction" of it.

So with interest compounded daily on .....for nonargumentative reasons....... $8 trillion there is no possible way of paying back the debt. The U.S. imports more than it exports. Nothing adds up

Toro, what exactly would you consider to be the assets of the United States of America to be?

And about the comment concerning a run on the banks, I was half joking.
I only wish we could all get together to make a run at the banks, however all they do in response is call in all their loans which does not even start to cover the money owed, and ...walah.... the banks have now created a recession and in the past a depression.
 
Last edited:

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
We can all argue, or we can wait another ten years and see what happens.

Just like we did in the 60's, and the 70's, and the 80's............
 

Albertabound

Electoral Member
Sep 2, 2006
555
2
18
No, what he is saying is that there isn't enough currency. Currency is different from money.

Money....a debt based note
currency.....a metal or paper medium exchange that is presently used

sounds the same to me
 
Last edited:

Toro

Senate Member
the debt in 8 trillion true enough, however that does not include interest. Would anyone like to figure out what the interest compounded daily would be on that.

But its not particularly relevant. What is relevant is the economic activity to support the debt. And that is still fairly low considering it was nearly double 60 years ago, and it is double in Italy and Japan today.

Remember the Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank. It is neither federal

This is not correct.

Who owns the Federal Reserve?

The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone and is not a private, profit-making institution. Instead, it is an independent entity within the government, having both public purposes and private aspects.
As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. However, the Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government. Therefore, the Federal Reserve can be more accurately described as "independent within the government."
http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#5

And it is certainly federal

http://www.federalreserve.gov/otherfrb.htm

or does it have the reserve of the trillions of dollars it has loaned out. It only has a..........."fraction" of it.

So with interest compounded daily on .....for nonargumentative reasons....... $8 trillion there is no possible way of paying back the debt.

Compounded daily interest is not relevant. The US could pay off its debt, if it so chose, by increasing taxes and cutting spending. It would take many years, but it would be done, just like Canada - which was in much worse shape than America currently - is doing. But there is no political will to do so.

The U.S. imports more than it exports. Nothing adds up

The US trade deficit has nothing to do with the Federal Reserve System.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Hey DB

Hope you are well.

I really don't know. I've always been in the "bad things will happen" camp, but so far I've been wrong about that. Housing prices have begun to fall across the country, but so far, there hasn't been any damage.

So far.

I'm a sick man and you know it, but thanks for your kindness. If the prices have fallen then there must be damage somewhere, I saw equity losses at between ten and twenty % but I've forgotten the number of units that was against but it was :read2:big.
 

Albertabound

Electoral Member
Sep 2, 2006
555
2
18
Money....a debt based note
currency.....a metal or paper medium exchange that is presently used

sounds the same to me
When I say the "same" I mean they are both something created out of nothing.

We can all argue, or we can wait another ten years and see what happens.

Just like we did in the 60's, and the 70's, and the 80's............
If you mean wait for the business cycle, the banks have created everyone of the business cycles by devalueating the dollar. When a country slips into a recession or depression it has to what?.......borrow money to get the economy started. Who do you think they borrow it from?

or we can wait another ten years

"The Treasury today announced the call for redemption at par on May 15, 2004 of the 9-1/8% Treasury Bonds of 2004-09, originally issued may 15, 1979, due May 15, 2009 (CUSIP No 9112810CG1). There are $4,606 million of these bonds outstanding, of which $3,109 million are held by private investors. Securities not redeemed on May 15, 2004 will stop earning interest.
These bonds are being called to reduce the cost of debt financing. The 9-18% interest rate is significantly above the current cost of securing financing for the five years remaining to their maturity. In current market conditions, Treasury estimates that interest savings from the call and refinancing will be about $544 million.
Payment will be made automatically by the Treasury for bonds in book-entry form, whether held on the books of the Federal Reserve Banks or in Treasury /Direct accounts.
 

Albertabound

Electoral Member
Sep 2, 2006
555
2
18
the truth about the federal reserve

For the foreign holders of US debt, this could be the ultimate ‘weapon of mass destruction’: they have the power to pull the plug on the US economy. Foreign central bans, concerned with the dramatic flip from a US budget surplus of $236.4 billion in 2000 to a deficit of $413 billion by the end of 2004, are quietly switching their reserves from dollars to Euros and yen. Mark Weisbrot, do-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, observed in January 2005:

This will begin to destablize the dollar just as a run on banks, and devaluation on currency will take place just as it did with the German Mark and turn it into worthless paper.

or we can wait another ten years and see what happens.
or if I was an American I would be writing my cogressmen to once again allow for the greenback to be printed. The people have the power. Not the Banks.

Don't worry Canada is not far behind and when the U.S. crashes what do you think Canada will do. We should be writing the same letters.
 

Albertabound

Electoral Member
Sep 2, 2006
555
2
18
We can all argue, or we can wait another ten years and see what happens.

Combining these three sources of funding - $353 billion in interest income, $529 billion in new US Notes to cover annual growth in the money supply, and $333 billion saved in interest payments on the federal debt – the public coffers could have been swelled by $1,215 billion in 2002. Total personal income taxes that year came to only $1,074 billion. Thus by reclaiming the power to create money from the private banking system, congress could have eliminated personal income tax for 2002, with a $141 billion dollars to spare. How much is $141 billion? According to the Unites Nations, a mere $80 billion added to existing resources in 1995 would have been enough to cut world poverty and hunger in half, achieve universal primary education and gender equality, reduce under-five mortality by two-thirds and maternal mortality by three-quarters, reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS, and halve the proportion of people without access to safe water world-wide

But just look at what we could accomplish
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Revolution is in my blood. Are we overthrowing the monarchy in Canada? It's long overdue, no?

Yes the damn usless inbreed monarchy must go.In Canada we are jam in an imperial sandwich stuck between a mouldy old piece of enriched white and a thin slice of new-age wonderbread. Seems we'll be eaten whatever happens.:)
 

Albertabound

Electoral Member
Sep 2, 2006
555
2
18
Seems we'll be eaten whatever happens.

That's the problem, people are too damn passive. "oh well, I guess their is nothing we can do" F*#k that! When a post on ....Dinning Alone ....gets 364 posts and 7000 views their is something seriously wacked about our ways.

Our countries, our world could and be so much better off if we had no "money changers" bankers. And we have the power to rid them.




History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance. -James Madison
 
Last edited:

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
The US has been crippled financially before and easily walked out of it. The power of BB is immense. As long as people the world over are willing to accept paper for goods and services, there's virtually no need to worry. We've got lots of paper. Granted foreign debt holders like China seem to be in the captain's chair but with the American market so big and China's fledglng prosperity so dependent on continued American access, there's likely to be little change. Iran's insistence it will no longer do oil deals in greenbacks is a start on a run but it's got a long way to go.
 

Toro

Senate Member
When I say the "same" I mean they are both something created out of nothing.

In the many times I have had this argument, I have found that the guy on the other side does not understand the nature of money.

"Money" and "currency" are not the same.

Currency are the dollar bills you have in your pocket. Money is a medium of exchange, a unit of account and a store of value. Here are the different types of money.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_supply

Money is "created out of nothing" in that human beings assign a value to whatever it is they use for currency. For example, in prison, cigarettes are often used as money. Milton Friedman gives the example of sea shells on the bottom of the ocean that nobody can touch or exchange as money because people believe that is money.

If you mean wait for the business cycle, the banks have created everyone of the business cycles by devalueating the dollar. When a country slips into a recession or depression it has to what?.......borrow money to get the economy started. Who do you think they borrow it from?

The problem with this analysis is, of course, if you've studied economic history, you understand that throughout most of America's existance, up until a few decades ago, depressions and recession were usually met with the collapse of banks. Often times, many banks. Also, if you have ever analyzed actual banks today, you know that they prosper in a good economy, not a bad one. When credit is tight, bad loans rise, profits fall, multiples fall, stocks go down, balance sheets shrink, cost of borrowing rises as risk premiums rise, people are fired, executives lose their jobs, etc., etc., etc. So to say that banks engineer recessions and depressions is not only completely at odds with economic history, it fails to understand the economics of banking, or even the very nature of banking itself.


"The Treasury today announced the call for redemption at par on May 15, 2004 of the 9-1/8% Treasury Bonds of 2004-09, originally issued may 15, 1979, due May 15, 2009 (CUSIP No 9112810CG1). There are $4,606 million of these bonds outstanding, of which $3,109 million are held by private investors. Securities not redeemed on May 15, 2004 will stop earning interest.
These bonds are being called to reduce the cost of debt financing. The 9-18% interest rate is significantly above the current cost of securing financing for the five years remaining to their maturity. In current market conditions, Treasury estimates that interest savings from the call and refinancing will be about $544 million.
Payment will be made automatically by the Treasury for bonds in book-entry form, whether held on the books of the Federal Reserve Banks or in Treasury /Direct accounts.


And?

Corporations do this all the time. If you have the opportunity to replace high cost debt with low cost debt, you don't do it? If you don't, you should pop down to the local community college and take a course in basic finance.

BTW, America is currently going through the longest time period without a bank shutting its doors since WWII.