







Prime Minister Mark Carney said Tuesday he has no plans to apply new trade pressure on the U.S. as Americans prepare for crucial midterm elections that could end Republican control of Congress. Speaking with reporters at a news conference in Vancouver on Tuesday, Carney said Canada has no intention of escalating the trade war, although he noted he never rules anything out.







Canada has had a large scale domestic auto industry since 1904 . How and why is that ? Tariffs maybe .U.S. President Donald Trump's war of words with Canada continued Wednesday as he veered off a prepared scriptat an event marking Hispanic Heritage Month in the States to chastise Canadian (Snow Mexican) leaders for being what he called "very bad."
Speaking at the White House, Trump said the U.S. was "stupidly run" before he got the job because past leaders allowed automakers to move assembly plants offshore, including to Canada.
(Canada has had a large-scale domestic auto manufacturing industry since 1904, developing at roughly the same time as the one in the U.S.)
Trump said past presidents "allowed other countries to make our cars and sell them to us," because nobody but Americans made cars before 1965 and he is ending that now with his high-tariff regime. The Trump administration has repeatedly made it clear that it wants to hollow out Canada's auto industry. "Canada has taken advantage of us for so many years. The worst of any country," Trump said.
"I love the![]()
Trump says 'very bad' Canada is being 'taught a little lesson' as trade action escalates — CBC News
U.S. President Donald Trump's war of words with Canada continued Wednesday as he veered off a prepared script at an event marking Hispanic Heritage Month in the States to chastise Canadian leaders for being what he called "very bad."apple.news
MexicanCanadian people, but the leaders have taken advantage of our stupid leadership for many, many years. They felt emboldened…They act like they're totally innocent. They're not. They were very bad. But now they're being taught a little lesson." One of those "lessons," as the president described it, was his unilateral move to rename Lake Ontario in the U.S.
View attachment 35832
Addressing a largely Hispanic audience, Trump said his move to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America was "even cooler."
"There could be a few people in the room that don't love that one," he said.
In an interview with Fox Business, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the administration is irked by Canadian liquor restrictions and limits on American businesses competing for provincial procurement contracts — restrictions enacted only after Trump slapped coercive unilateral tariffs on Canadian goods last year. Greer said the import ban is retribution for that lack of capitulation.
View attachment 35833
Very different time before an integrated Automotive supply chain and assembly situation involving three nations for the North American market, but I hear what you’re saying. 122 years ago.Canada has had a large scale domestic auto industry since 1904 . How and why is that ? Tariffs maybe .
But hasn’t that integraded supply chain been a political tug of war for that entire time?Very different time before an integrated Automotive supply chain and assembly situation involving three nations for the North American market, but I hear what you’re saying. 122 years ago.
But isn’t it a thing that exists, and has now for 60+ years, but more interwound since NAFTA 1.0 32 years ago and apparently more so every year? The Hydra exists and chopping off its tentacles now to try and untangle it would probably kill it in the short term…adding billions in expenses for the auto manufacturers. I’ve heard roughly an increase on average of $6000 per vehicle for these tariffs which is just gonna give the competitive advantage to Asian and European auto manufacturers which I’m assuming isn’t Trump’s intention.But hasn’t that integraded supply chain been a political tug of war for that entire time?
You know, this is a very interesting question and it forced me to find the right phrasing by finding the background find the answer to that, so on that note, I’m assuming that you knew the answer all the way along, right?Canada has had a large scale domestic auto industry since 1904 . How and why is that ? Tariffs maybe .
I smell what you’re cooking now. The McKinley Tariff was designed to protect American industries and coerce Canada into political annexation by the United States. Framed by Congressman William McKinley, the act became law on October 1, 1890, and raised the average duty on imports to nearly 50 percent (sounds familiar) without making exceptions for Canadian products. It lasted until 1894, when Democrats replaced it with the lower Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act after a protectionist backlash.But hasn’t that integraded supply chain been a political tug of war for that entire time?
So what was Carney’s intention when he walked away from an agreement ? Why haven’t we made any progress after a year and half of our saviour global banker running the show ?But isn’t it a thing that exists, and has now for 60+ years, but more interwound since NAFTA 1.0 32 years ago and apparently more so every year? The Hydra exists and chopping off its tentacles now to try and untangle it would probably kill it in the short term…adding billions in expenses for the auto manufacturers. I’ve heard roughly an increase on average of $6000 per vehicle for these tariffs which is just gonna give the competitive advantage to Asian and European auto manufacturers which I’m assuming isn’t Trump’s intention.
But that was only the start of what eventually became the auto pact . We are always in a trade dispute with America in one form or another , and somehow entrepreneurs on both sides of the border managed to trade , as they still are .You know, this is a very interesting question and it forced me to find the right phrasing by finding the background find the answer to that, so on that note, I’m assuming that you knew the answer all the way along, right?
I smell what you’re cooking now. The McKinley Tariff was designed to protect American industries and coerce Canada into political annexation by the United States. Framed by Congressman William McKinley, the act became law on October 1, 1890, and raised the average duty on imports to nearly 50 percent (sounds familiar) without making exceptions for Canadian products. It lasted until 1894, when Democrats replaced it with the lower Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act after a protectionist backlash.
While the McKinley Tariff itself focused heavily on agricultural and raw material disputes (like timber and fisheries), the broader era of aggressive cross-border trade restrictions it reinforced became the catalyst for the birth of the Canadian automotive industry.![]()
McKinley Tariff - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Officially, the U.S. Republican platform sought to shield domestic workers and companies from foreign competition (again, sounds familiar). Unofficially, U.S. policymakers like McKinley and Secretary of State James G. Blaine used it as an economic weapon. Knowing Canada was deeply reliant on the U.S. market, they intentionally denied Canada any trade exemptions. They openly hoped that severe economic starvation would force Canadians to abandon British ties and accept annexation into the United States, which in a modern context again sounds very familiar.
So Trumps trying to copy the playbook from 140-ish years ago, but the times have changed, and it didn’t work back then anyway, and that’s before an integrated supply chain in manufacturing like we have now specifically for the last three decades.
Nothing started until the last day of the deadline on Canada Day 2026 for all intents & purposes…re negotiation, or lack there of.So what was Carney’s intention when he walked away from an agreement ? Why haven’t we made any progress after a year and half of our saviour global banker running the show ?
The dreams of annex of Canada go back to these initial tariffs and McKinley, so the playbook isn’t that different, auto-pact or not.But that was only the start of what eventually became the auto pact . We are always in a trade dispute with America in one form or another , and somehow entrepreneurs on both sides of the border managed to trade , as they still are .
As much of a pain in the arse as that was in the 70s (I was in elementary school at the time and they didn’t know if the metric system would stick, so we were being taught everything in metric and imperial side-by-side for the next several years), but it did bring Canada into the modern era leaving only three countries on the planet still using the imperial system to the best of my knowledge (Liberia and Myanmar are the two of three that haven’t landed a man on the moonTrudeau 1 gave us the metric system to facilitate trade diversification as he was in the midst of a trade dispute . The current situation is nothing new except Trump and our pathetic PM .