Well, look on the bright side. At least he didn't suffer the evils of soshulist health care.Our son wasn't driving, he was a pedestrian. Uninsured motorists' coverage don't cover that.
Well, look on the bright side. At least he didn't suffer the evils of soshulist health care.Our son wasn't driving, he was a pedestrian. Uninsured motorists' coverage don't cover that.
Are you sure ?Well, look on the bright side. At least he didn't suffer the evils of soshulist health care.
But the only road access is through Canada. We could make that a toll road as well.Pt. Roberts is on the 49th parallel . 51 is up around Pt. Hardy in line with Revelstoke .
Still happening. There are several problems at play here. A lack of facilities, especially outside the lower mainland and Victoria. An overabundance of rich retirees from elsewhere. Politics. Outside the lowermainland and the island, most ridings are not NDP. The majority of ER closures also happen to be outside the lower mainland and the island, with the exception of the North island area. Huge area, sparely populated with a bunch of small hospitals and not much for entertainment unless you are an outdoors type.And while I agree that we SHOULDN'T be sending people to the US for care, it also says a lot that if there are that many that need radiation, I'd wonder if there's something going on to cause that many people needing the treatment. Unless it's a regional thing where people end up going to just one place for care.
Actually it is true. Check out the Fraser Institute.Actually that's not true.
That's the kind of medical care that MISMANAGEMENT of the system provides.
And naturally, you get to decide how much tax each person should pay. Why should the "rich" have to pay more fore healthcare than anyone else?Yeah, they do, because they're part of the problem that health care lacks funding. If we taxed the "rich" like they should be, then maybe the $$ would be there.
Not a great comparison. Most of Europe does better, and they mostly have a dual system.32d healthiest country in the world. Not stellar, but above the UK and well above the U.S.
You have a dual system. It's called "crossing the border."Not a great comparison. Most of Europe does better, and they mostly have a dual system.
Oh here we go. That stupid old saw.If we taxed the "rich" like they should be, then maybe the $$ would be there.
Well, look on the bright side. At least he didn't suffer the evils of soshulist health care.
Well, that's not a very nice thing to call your son.Moron.
Many of the residents are Canadian .But the only road access is through Canada. We could make that a toll road as well.
Oh, fer. . . the "mechanism" myth again.Maybe if there were mechanisms in place that forced govts to be accountable for their spending then maybe the $$ would be there.
Let them in for half price? Or maybe let them pay in Northern Pesos?Many of the residents are Canadian .
Emperor has a nicer ring to it. Sounds more benevolent.Oh, fer. . . the "mechanism" myth again.
There are two "mechanisms." One is democracy. The other is dictatorship.
No, there is no Great Big Daddy or Great Big Mechanism to force the government to do what you want it to do.
Unless you become the dictator.
Third mechanism: Protest. Or if necessary, full-on revolt. Funny thing about govts, they only have the kind of power they have because people foolishly let them have it.Oh, fer. . . the "mechanism" myth again.
There are two "mechanisms." One is democracy. The other is dictatorship.
No, there is no Great Big Daddy or Great Big Mechanism to force the government to do what you want it to do.
Unless you become the dictator.
Go for it.Third mechanism: Protest. Or if necessary, full-on revolt. Funny thing about govts, they only have the kind of power they have because people foolishly let them have it.
One person doth not a revolt make. Nor does one get a revolt worked up in a couple of hours. Unless you're in a labour union.Go for it.
(waits. . .)
Yeah, didn't think so.