Roe v. Wade overturned?

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,253
5,879
113
Olympus Mons



But sure, the overturning of Roe saved lives!
Ask ANY biologist on the planet when life begins and 100% of them will tell you, "at the moment of conception". How many of those lives did Roe save?

And where exactly in R v W did it state that abortion on demand had to be funded by the taxpayer? Perhaps you can point me as to where in the ruling it stated such.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,096
8,345
113
Washington DC
Ask ANY biologist on the planet when life begins and 100% of them will tell you, "at the moment of conception". How many of those lives did Roe save?
Irrelevant. By the way, most of them would say "when the molecules become sufficiently complex to replicate themselves."
And where exactly in R v W did it state that abortion on demand had to be funded by the taxpayer? Perhaps you can point me as to where in the ruling it stated such.
It didn't. Have you ever read the opinion? It's regarded in American legal circles as one of the worst-decided political compromises ever to be clothed in a black robe and called legal reasoning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
So maybe he should propose legislation that codifies abortion .
You are going to have a tough time finding a biologist that wasn't raised in a Catholic school that believes that
Silly goose, Catholics invented Science. Its a legal not a Catholic issue. Catholic say all life is sacred as decried by God to Moses Thall shakt not fucking murder. Abortion is murder.

Cant. Something decrimalized doesnt become a defacto Right post law revision. Same goes for the US and A. There wasnt and never will be a Right to abortion. The excused used by baby murders is that a fetus isnt a legal person established the filing of a birth certificate which is merely a receipt that the establishes a human as a legal person with full Rights and Duties.

Weirdly if you kill a pregnant woman youll be charged with a double homicide.
 
Last edited:

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,034
2,420
113
New Brunswick
Ask ANY biologist on the planet when life begins and 100% of them will tell you, "at the moment of conception".

Except "Any" Biologist doesn't mean ALL biologists.

And not all biologists have that belief, sorry.

How many of those lives did Roe save?

Doesn't matter.

This isn't about babies, that's been proven repeatedly. It's about control over women (only) and their reproductive rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,363
12,825
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ask ANY biologist on the planet when life begins and 100% of them will tell you, "at the moment of conception". How many of those lives did Roe save?

And where exactly in R v W did it state that abortion on demand had to be funded by the taxpayer? Perhaps you can point me as to where in the ruling it stated susuch.
How was legalization transformed into a Right? That is a nasty lie.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,720
7,543
113
B.C.
Silly goose, Catholics invented Science. Its a legal not a Catholic issue. Catholic say all life is sacred as decried by God to Moses Thall shakt not fucking murder. Abortion is murder.

Cant. Something decrimalized doesnt become a defacto Right post law revision. Same goes for the US and A. There wasnt and never will be a Right to abortion. The excused used by baby murders is that a fetus isnt a legal person established the filing of a birth certificate which is merely a receipt that the establishes a human as a legal person with full Rights and Duties.

Weirdly if you kill a pregnant woman youll be charged with a double homicide.
So you don’t like Catholics are they the only people with these beliefs?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,720
7,543
113
B.C.
Except "Any" Biologist doesn't mean ALL biologists.

And not all biologists have that belief, sorry.



Doesn't matter.

This isn't about babies, that's been proven repeatedly. It's about control over women (only) and their reproductive rights.
Let’s force an experimental gene altering vaccination on the population . Tell me about control over bodies .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,253
5,879
113
Olympus Mons
Except "Any" Biologist doesn't mean ALL biologists.

And not all biologists have that belief, sorry.
Yeah, they do. Biology is all about the study of life. Any biologist who says life doesn't begin at conception is pushing bullshit narratives and should be stripped of their credentials.
Doesn't matter.

This isn't about babies, that's been proven repeatedly. It's about control over women (only) and their reproductive rights.
Yeah, it's not about babies, that's why Western nations are continually increasing immigration levels. Maybe if the irresponsible baby murderers actually let their unborn children live, we wouldn't "need" massive immigration.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,253
5,879
113
Olympus Mons
You are going to have a tough time finding a biologist that wasn't raised in a Catholic school that believes that.
Not really. It's not a "Christian Science belief". It's observable fact. At the moment of conception cell division starts taking place. Cell division = life.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,034
2,420
113
New Brunswick
Yeah, they do. Biology is all about the study of life. Any biologist who says life doesn't begin at conception is pushing bullshit narratives and should be stripped of their credentials.

I think it depends on what you mean by "life" when talking about a zygote and earlier stages. Is it TECHNICALLY life? Yes. So in that you're right.



So 4% don't think "life" begins at conception.

But maybe then the question is or should be - is a fertilized egg a human. And in that case... no, no it's not.

The problem is the language; when people bring up "Life begins at conception" - the automatic view most people default to is "Life = human/personhood". Actual life, life, yes, provided it meets the criteria. But in the terms of abortion and its arguments, it's not actual life, it's actual personhood. Hence the huge debate about it.


Yeah, it's not about babies,

Exactly, the Religious and pro-forced birth people have proven it repeatedly.

that's why Western nations are continually increasing immigration levels.

... are... you serious in this or are you just being a dick? Because abortions have NOTHING to do with immigrating level increases.

Maybe if the irresponsible baby murderers

... Like people who masturbate and people who get a period? Because in all instances, those are people who COULD have kids, but don't 'make' them.

actually let their unborn children live,

So the people who DO want their kids, but nature said "Fuck you" and killed their baby instead... that's the person's fault?

Please continue to show you don't get who pregnancy in women works.

we wouldn't "need" massive immigration.

One word fights all that stupidity you just said, Jin.

Choice.

Unless you are forcing women to birth babies.... is that what you are demanding, Jinny? All people able to get pregnant HAVE to, and they HAVE to have the baby and they HAVE to have more after that is born?

You're supportive of your daughters and granddaughters being forced into being birthing machines then?

Because while I'm sure you'd deny it, that IS what you are saying, Jin. At least man up and honestly admit that's what you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,032
3,819
113
Edmonton



But sure, the overturning of Roe saved lives!
Actually, the take is this: one woman that died did so because of the "abortion pill" she took. I'm sure there'll be many more deaths due to this pill but hey, that's the risk one takes I guess.