What documents are needed in order to obtain a passport? A Canadian passport specifically.
Should terrorists and their supporters lose their Canadian citizenship?
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Its still all Provincial ID except in the case of a citizenship card.
The birth certificate is enough to get a passport. Doesn't matter if it's provincial. If it's good enough to get a passport, then it is also good enough to prove citizenship. Used to be good enough to drive to and from the USA as well.
Its all Provincial for a reason.
When shit like this happens.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Quebec_referendum
If we simply eliminate them from the gene pool, citizenship becomes irrelevant.If the Government of Canada recognizes certain factions as a terrorist group.. list attached below
List of organizations designated as terrorist by Canada - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
...and as a Canadian citizen you join them and act against Canadians in a terrorist plot or fight against Canada's military.. should you still retain your citizenship??
Is that still an opera term? I know the practise is banned, & I’ve heard the one surviving recording of one… But you’re the first person I’ve ever actually seen use the term outside of that opera application.
It means "people who have been castrated." It's Italian. I thought it more concise and elegant than the English "nutless motherfuckers."
Technically, nutless people aren't fucking anyone including their mothers.
I figured on removing them from the gene pool by cutting off their access to O2. Why leave anything to chance?
Nah, it doesn't. Fuck the UN. They are an utter joke of an organization/quasi-govt body. Any non-national entity that acts as some kind of governing authority but wasn't elected by any citizens anywhere is illegitimate as far as I'm concerned and not worth listening to.
By non-national you mean... what exactly?
I also think you don't get what the UN is - supposed to anyway - be for. It was never meant to be some sort of Governing body over nations/the world.
As past experience shows, there are several factors that are essential for a successful peacekeeping operation. It must:
- Be guided by the principles of consent, impartiality and the non-use of force except in self-defense and defense of the mandate;
- Be perceived as legitimate and credible, particularly in the eyes of the local population;
- Promote national and local ownership of the peace process in the host country.
- Genuine commitment to a political process by the parties in working towards peace (there must be a peace to keep);
- Clear, credible and achievable mandates, with matching personnel, logistic and financial resources;
- Unity of purpose within the Security Council, with active support to UN operations in the field;
- Host country commitment to unhindered UN operations and freedom of movement;
- Supportive engagement by neighbouring countries and regional actors;
- An integrated UN approach, effective coordination with other actors on the ground and good communication with host country authorities and population;
- The utmost sensitivity towards the local population and upholding the highest standards of professionalism and good conduct (peacekeepers must avoid becoming part of the problem).
Our successes
We have, built up an impressive record of peacekeeping achievements over more than 70 years of our existence, including winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Since 1948, the UN has helped end conflicts and foster reconciliation by conducting successful peacekeeping operations in dozens of countries...peacekeeping.un.org
Oh Serryah. I know exactly what the UN was intended to be, but it took mere weeks to become a total goat fuck. But I'm talking about the General Assembly. Countries like China chairing the Human Rights Committee or Saudi Arabia chairing the Women's Rights Committee. Or Robert Mugabe being the UN's Ambassador of Tourism. Or how China is a signatory of UNCLOS despite not being on the GA yet the UN continually looks the other way when it comes to the South China Sea, the territorial waters of other poor countries and internationally declared protected areas. Why bother having treaties and agreements and shit if you're only going to selectively enforce them?
Where's the UN when it comes to the Houthis attacking merchant shipping in the Red Sea? That's a global issue. At least do something about something real instead of chasing the AGW boogey man like they're Scooby fucking Doo or something.
Yeah sure, the UN will send Peacekeepers into a full-fledged war zone (former Yugoslavia to be exact, although they were prevented from stopping any ethnic cleansing going on) but won't do jack-shit about merchant shipping being attacked in the Red Sea.