The Capital Cost Allowance on EVs when filing a T2 is garbage. It caps at 40% depreciation. I can depreciate an ICE at 80%
April Fools!! Here's your Carbon Tax F#ckers!!!
- Thread starter Ron in Regina
- Start date
If capitalism is correct, people who are valuable to society will make good pay, and people who are of little or no value will starve.
Or, as that great businessman Ebenezer Scrooge said before he was corrupted by the socialist spirits "If they are going to die, let them get on with it and reduce the surplus population."
Or, as that great businessman Ebenezer Scrooge said before he was corrupted by the socialist spirits "If they are going to die, let them get on with it and reduce the surplus population."
Youre being overun by natives who for some reason need your catalytic converter and copper pipe.
Premiers pan green-energy plans as cold weather strains Alberta's electricity grid — The Canadian Press
EDMONTON - Some Prairie politicians are taking Ottawa to task over its green-energy plans amid bone-chilling low temperatures, claiming on social media that electricity grid alerts in Alberta show renewables can't be depended on when temperatures plunge.
We’re on a warming trend finally. Phew!!
You would think, but it just doesn’t. It is breaking, at least on paper, sort of.
The furnace is going almost nonstop.
Manitoba premier wants to work with Ottawa on revisiting carbon pricing — Global News
Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew says that he wants to work with Ottawa in his desire to revisit the federal carbon price's application in his province.
The "holy fuck" moment is coming next month on energy bills. Record cold means record carbon tax.The federal carbon price will increase to $80 per tonne on April Fools’ Day as per usual.
Manitoba premier wants to work with Ottawa on revisiting carbon pricing — Global News
Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew says that he wants to work with Ottawa in his desire to revisit the federal carbon price's application in his province.apple.news
So the carbon tax is working on reducing our global climate type stuff like they’re promising?
It must. That plume of untaxed CO2 huffing out the back of the house right now as I type is working great. I'm alive aren't I?
A vow by the energy-producing province of Saskatchewan not to collect a federal carbon tax on some homes is irresponsible, Canada's energy minister said on Thursday in comments that added to a mounting dispute between Ottawa and the provinces.
'It's irresponsible': Justin Trudeau's natural resources minister is worried about a provincial rebellion brewing against Ottawa. Jonathan Wilkinson is concerned about what he's hearing from some premiers, and he's "had it up to here with Mr. Poilievre," Susan Delacourt writes.
What’re ya going to do about it Jonathan?
Long before he was Canada’s natural resources minister, Jonathan Wilkinson was part of the once-thriving constitutional industry in Canada.
As a negotiator for Saskatchewan’s then-premier Roy Romanow, Wilkinson had a front-row seat in the talks that led to the Charlottetown constitutional accord in the early 1990s.
So now, nearly 30 years later, watching the current Government of Saskatchewan talking about opting out of federal measures it doesn’t like — the price on carbon, for instance — Wilkinson is particularly, even personally, taken aback. His constitutional past and his natural resources present are colliding, and not in a way Wilkinson had ever expected.
www.thestar.com
The federal government's discussions around rebranding the rebate program for its carbon pricing system are aimed at ensuring Canadians are aware of what their rebates are for, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said Tuesday?
The first public acknowledgment of a potential rebrand of the government's flagship climate policy comes as the Conservatives immediately dismissed the idea, and experts and political insiders raised questions on whether a rebrand would boost perceptions of the carbon price. Is it a communications problem?
"I think the discussions around rebranding really relate to trying to ensure that it's understandable," Wilkinson said on his way into the Liberals' weekly cabinet meeting. "A lot of folks out there don't know what they're getting when they actually get the rebate."
Catherine (Climate Barbie) McKenna, who first introduced the price on carbon as environment and climate change minister in 2018, said she had worked incessantly after introducing the policy to make sure she and MPs emphasized the rebates to Canadians. But she can't help but feel "disappointed" with how the government has since communicated the policy, she said.
"Whatever you want to call it, you have to ensure you're telling people they're getting (a portion of their) money back," she said, calling for an "all-MP effort and "constant communications."
www.thestar.com
'It's irresponsible': Justin Trudeau's natural resources minister is worried about a provincial rebellion brewing against Ottawa. Jonathan Wilkinson is concerned about what he's hearing from some premiers, and he's "had it up to here with Mr. Poilievre," Susan Delacourt writes.
What’re ya going to do about it Jonathan?
Long before he was Canada’s natural resources minister, Jonathan Wilkinson was part of the once-thriving constitutional industry in Canada.
As a negotiator for Saskatchewan’s then-premier Roy Romanow, Wilkinson had a front-row seat in the talks that led to the Charlottetown constitutional accord in the early 1990s.
So now, nearly 30 years later, watching the current Government of Saskatchewan talking about opting out of federal measures it doesn’t like — the price on carbon, for instance — Wilkinson is particularly, even personally, taken aback. His constitutional past and his natural resources present are colliding, and not in a way Wilkinson had ever expected.
Susan Delacourt: ‘It’s irresponsible’: Justin Trudeau’s natural resources minister is worried about a provincial rebellion brewing against Ottawa
Jonathan Wilkinson is concerned about what he's hearing from some premiers, and he's "had it up to here with Mr. Poilievre," Susan Delacourt writes.
The federal government's discussions around rebranding the rebate program for its carbon pricing system are aimed at ensuring Canadians are aware of what their rebates are for, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said Tuesday?
The first public acknowledgment of a potential rebrand of the government's flagship climate policy comes as the Conservatives immediately dismissed the idea, and experts and political insiders raised questions on whether a rebrand would boost perceptions of the carbon price. Is it a communications problem?
"I think the discussions around rebranding really relate to trying to ensure that it's understandable," Wilkinson said on his way into the Liberals' weekly cabinet meeting. "A lot of folks out there don't know what they're getting when they actually get the rebate."
Catherine (Climate Barbie) McKenna, who first introduced the price on carbon as environment and climate change minister in 2018, said she had worked incessantly after introducing the policy to make sure she and MPs emphasized the rebates to Canadians. But she can't help but feel "disappointed" with how the government has since communicated the policy, she said.
"Whatever you want to call it, you have to ensure you're telling people they're getting (a portion of their) money back," she said, calling for an "all-MP effort and "constant communications."
Justin Trudeau’s government may rebrand its carbon pricing program. But is it too late?
The federal government's discussions around rebranding the rebate program for its carbon pricing system are aimed at ensuring Canadians are aware of what their rebates are for, Natural Resources Minister