It's Climate Change I tell'ya!! IT'S CLIMATE CHANGE!!

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
Where is the truth?

The Maunder Minimum (nearly no solar magnetic activity) roughly coincided with the middle part of the Little Ice Age, during which Europe and North America experienced colder than average temperatures. Whether there is a causal relationship, however, is still under evaluation.[17]

Or

NASA scientists say the energy from the sun only changes 0.15 per cent over the course of a cycle, which could not be responsible for the changes we have seen in recent decades.

"None of the research that I'm aware of indicates the connection that anything happening in space is causing climate change," says Manuel.

So although the solar cycle is not to blame for the changes we are seeing, it does have its place in the overall climate puzzle.

Finding that connection is a focus of a newly funded satellite mission called RADICALS out of the University of Alberta
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
Only 2 States are rain free today.

Screenshot_20230809_144856_WeatherCAN.jpg

We were just missed by a "Cannibal CME:"

Why does it rain when get nailed by a Coronal Mass Ejection or X Class Solar Flares?


Lets rewind to the last solar punch 3 weeks ago on July 19


The same/following day July 20 after....

chrome_screenshot_1691615141372.png
 
Last edited:

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
Ottawa closing Arctic weather stations despite climate change: Memo
Both automated and manual weather stations have seen a decrease

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Aug 08, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 1 minute read
An Environment Department memo says the feds closed Arctic weather stations even as catastrophic climate change was being warned of, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.
An Environment Department memo says the feds closed Arctic weather stations even as catastrophic climate change was being warned of, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.
An Environment Department memo says the feds closed Arctic weather stations even as catastrophic climate change was being warned of, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.


The memo, dated March 27, said automated weather stations in Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut had decreased from 73 to 69 since 2012.


“In terms of manual observations the Meteorological Service reached its peak in 1988 with 94 sites,” said the memo, adding that today there are 57.

“The decrease of manual observations over time is a worldwide phenomenon,” said the memo.

No reason was given for the closures.

The memo said there was an “urgent need for Canadian communities to adapt to this new reality” of climate change.

“Average temperatures in Canada are rising at twice the worldwide average with the North seeing increases up to three times this global rate,” said the memo.

“Indeed, extreme weather events experienced across Canada over the past several years have shown how climate change has already altered our reality and put the safety, security and economic prosperity of Canadians at risk.”

Parliament had voted to spend $384 million to modernize the Meteorological Service of Canada.

A 2022 audit found Environment Canada forecasts were accurate as little as 77% of the time.

Three-day forecasts were accurate about 87 % of the time, wrote auditors, and five-day forecasts were only 77% accurate.

The Meteorological Service dates from 1871 with forecasts drawn from radar installations, marine buoys, weather balloons, lightning sensors and land stations.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,289
113
What's killing Florida's coral reefs - and why you should care
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Dino Grandoni and Allyson Chiu
Published Aug 09, 2023 • 5 minute read

“Off the charts.” “Disastrous.” “The worst bleaching event that Florida has ever seen.”


That’s how scientists are describing the ecological disaster unfolding in the seas around the Sunshine State.


In recent weeks, a blistering marine heat wave has sent water temperatures off the coast of South Florida – home to the largest living barrier reef in the continental United States – skyrocketing to record highs, causing an extensive coral bleaching event.

The situation may get worse before it gets better, with much of the Caribbean projected to see coral-damaging temperatures in the coming weeks, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Here’s what you need to know.

So what, exactly, is coral?
Good question. Is it a plant? An animal? The answer is: kind of both.

Scientists officially classify corals as a type of animal. But unlike most members of the animal kingdom, the thousands of polyps that make up a reef don’t move around much, using tentacle-like arms to scoop up food drifting by. Rooted to the seafloor, scientists call coral sessile – that is, the opposite of mobile – animals.


But those little immobile animals have help. Plantlike organisms called zooxanthellae reside inside most coral.

It’s a symbiotic relation: Corals provide these organisms nutrients as well as a nice, protected place to bask in the underwater sun. Like plants, zooxanthellae harvest energy from sunlight.

Corals, with their limestone skeletons, in turn use organic material from zooxanthellae to construct the elaborate, multicolored submarine cathedrals that draw legions of snorkelers and scuba divers.

The result: Together, the two help create some of the most beautiful and beneficial ecosystems on the planet.

What’s happening to the coral in Florida?
While experts say the potential for a coral bleaching event wasn’t unexpected this summer, the arrival of superheated ocean temperatures came earlier and have been more intense than most thought. Typically, the Florida Keys experience high temperatures in mid-August through early September, said Jessica Levy, director of restoration strategy at the Coral Restoration Foundation.


“What people are really worried about is the longer it lasts, the more damage you start to see,” Levy said. “The fact that this happened in July and then we still have August and September, that’s scary.”

According to NOAA’s alert scale for corals, the current conditions are in the most extreme category, known as Alert Level 2. These conditions are projected to remain for the next 12 weeks.

Scientists are observing widespread bleaching along parts of the roughly 360-mile-long reef. The hotter conditions are also affecting critical efforts to restore the embattled ecosystem. The Coral Restoration Foundation reported that 100 percent of the corals at one restoration site in the Keys are bleached and a majority have already died, said Alice Grainger, the group’s senior director of communications.


“We’re also seeing corals that have even died before they bleached,” Grainger said.

What causes coral bleaching?
Corals are hardy, having existed on Earth for at least 500 million years. While reef-building corals prefer water that is between 73 and 84 degrees Fahrenheit, some can tolerate temperatures up to 104 degrees – at least for a short period of time.

But they can only endure the heat for so long. When the water is too warm for too lengthy a time, coral spit out their beneficial zooxanthellae, causing them to turn a deathly white. This is coral bleaching.

Despite their ghostly appearance, a bleached coral isn’t necessarily a dead one.

“Bleaching does not equal death,” said Jennifer Moore, a coral recovery specialist at NOAA.


“Corals are still alive when they bleach, and they can regain their algae that gives them their color and that gives them their food,” she added.

But while coral can survive a bleaching event, they are under more stress and are more likely to die.

Why should I care about coral?
Even if you’ve never spent a vacation day snorkeling a coral reef, you may want to thank one.

For seaside residents, healthy reefs are a living buffer against coastal storms and erosion. A weak, dead one will be chewed up by the waves.

For seafood lovers, they’re a crucial source of fish and lobsters. In fact, coral reefs support a quarter of all marine life.

The fallout from losing a coral reef remains frighteningly murky, Grainger said.

“That’s the scary thing,” Grainger said. “We know it would have extraordinary implications, but we just don’t know how bad it would be.”


Reefs may have even more to give – if they don’t vanish entirely, that is. In recent years, medical researchers have extracted chemicals from coral to help make better antibiotics.

But for those who are passionate about coral, sometimes it’s difficult to get others to care, too.

“It is a very hard thing to do,” said Kim Stone, director of fish and invertebrates at the Georgia Aquarium.

“Any animal that doesn’t have a face or doesn’t have eyes that you can look into, that you can associate with, is at times very hard to connect with,” she added.

How can coral be saved?
The pace and scale of bleaching in Florida has triggered what many experts are calling an “all-hands-on-deck” scramble to save as many corals as possible and improve the chances that affected sections of reef can recover.


Two urgent efforts are happening at the same time, Moore said:

Scientific teams are collecting small fragments from genetically unique corals and storing them on land in gene banks, which is critical to prevent any losses of genetic diversity.

They are also rescuing healthy coral stock, which can be used to make more coral or be planted onto damaged reefs, from areas that are too hot and moving the pieces to facilities on land or into deeper, cooler water to wait out the heat wave.

Moore added that experts are also developing plans to safeguard corals that are still in the water. Some potential interventions, she said, include shading nurseries or high-value reef sites, and providing corals with more food through a process known as supplemental feeding.


Additionally, experts said it’s important to reduce or remove local stressors that can further place further strain on the reef, such as runoff from land and overfishing.

What happens next?
In the longer term, experts said this bleaching event can provide crucial lessons about protecting and restoring the reef.

“There’s a lot that we can learn,” Moore said. “We would never just keep doing the same thing and expect a different result.”

For instance, scientists may put a greater focus on breeding corals that are more resilient or resistant to heat or disease, she said. Other experts said there may be increased efforts to create more land-based nurseries.

But restoring reefs alone won’t be enough. Drastic cuts to climate-warming emissions are needed. Not only does the buildup of carbon dioxide warm the atmosphere, but it also makes oceans more acidic and less hospitable for many marine animals.

According to one forecast, climate change may wipe out almost every coral reef habitat on Earth by the end of the century.

“Coral restoration is a critical part of the solution, but it’s not the whole solution,” Grainger said. “The solution needs to be action on climate change.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
What's killing Florida's coral reefs - and why you should care
Author of the article:Washington Post
Washington Post
Dino Grandoni and Allyson Chiu
Published Aug 09, 2023 • 5 minute read

“Off the charts.” “Disastrous.” “The worst bleaching event that Florida has ever seen.”


That’s how scientists are describing the ecological disaster unfolding in the seas around the Sunshine State.


In recent weeks, a blistering marine heat wave has sent water temperatures off the coast of South Florida – home to the largest living barrier reef in the continental United States – skyrocketing to record highs, causing an extensive coral bleaching event.

The situation may get worse before it gets better, with much of the Caribbean projected to see coral-damaging temperatures in the coming weeks, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Here’s what you need to know.

So what, exactly, is coral?
Good question. Is it a plant? An animal? The answer is: kind of both.

Scientists officially classify corals as a type of animal. But unlike most members of the animal kingdom, the thousands of polyps that make up a reef don’t move around much, using tentacle-like arms to scoop up food drifting by. Rooted to the seafloor, scientists call coral sessile – that is, the opposite of mobile – animals.


But those little immobile animals have help. Plantlike organisms called zooxanthellae reside inside most coral.

It’s a symbiotic relation: Corals provide these organisms nutrients as well as a nice, protected place to bask in the underwater sun. Like plants, zooxanthellae harvest energy from sunlight.

Corals, with their limestone skeletons, in turn use organic material from zooxanthellae to construct the elaborate, multicolored submarine cathedrals that draw legions of snorkelers and scuba divers.

The result: Together, the two help create some of the most beautiful and beneficial ecosystems on the planet.

What’s happening to the coral in Florida?
While experts say the potential for a coral bleaching event wasn’t unexpected this summer, the arrival of superheated ocean temperatures came earlier and have been more intense than most thought. Typically, the Florida Keys experience high temperatures in mid-August through early September, said Jessica Levy, director of restoration strategy at the Coral Restoration Foundation.


“What people are really worried about is the longer it lasts, the more damage you start to see,” Levy said. “The fact that this happened in July and then we still have August and September, that’s scary.”

According to NOAA’s alert scale for corals, the current conditions are in the most extreme category, known as Alert Level 2. These conditions are projected to remain for the next 12 weeks.

Scientists are observing widespread bleaching along parts of the roughly 360-mile-long reef. The hotter conditions are also affecting critical efforts to restore the embattled ecosystem. The Coral Restoration Foundation reported that 100 percent of the corals at one restoration site in the Keys are bleached and a majority have already died, said Alice Grainger, the group’s senior director of communications.


“We’re also seeing corals that have even died before they bleached,” Grainger said.

What causes coral bleaching?
Corals are hardy, having existed on Earth for at least 500 million years. While reef-building corals prefer water that is between 73 and 84 degrees Fahrenheit, some can tolerate temperatures up to 104 degrees – at least for a short period of time.

But they can only endure the heat for so long. When the water is too warm for too lengthy a time, coral spit out their beneficial zooxanthellae, causing them to turn a deathly white. This is coral bleaching.

Despite their ghostly appearance, a bleached coral isn’t necessarily a dead one.

“Bleaching does not equal death,” said Jennifer Moore, a coral recovery specialist at NOAA.


“Corals are still alive when they bleach, and they can regain their algae that gives them their color and that gives them their food,” she added.

But while coral can survive a bleaching event, they are under more stress and are more likely to die.

Why should I care about coral?
Even if you’ve never spent a vacation day snorkeling a coral reef, you may want to thank one.

For seaside residents, healthy reefs are a living buffer against coastal storms and erosion. A weak, dead one will be chewed up by the waves.

For seafood lovers, they’re a crucial source of fish and lobsters. In fact, coral reefs support a quarter of all marine life.

The fallout from losing a coral reef remains frighteningly murky, Grainger said.

“That’s the scary thing,” Grainger said. “We know it would have extraordinary implications, but we just don’t know how bad it would be.”


Reefs may have even more to give – if they don’t vanish entirely, that is. In recent years, medical researchers have extracted chemicals from coral to help make better antibiotics.

But for those who are passionate about coral, sometimes it’s difficult to get others to care, too.

“It is a very hard thing to do,” said Kim Stone, director of fish and invertebrates at the Georgia Aquarium.

“Any animal that doesn’t have a face or doesn’t have eyes that you can look into, that you can associate with, is at times very hard to connect with,” she added.

How can coral be saved?
The pace and scale of bleaching in Florida has triggered what many experts are calling an “all-hands-on-deck” scramble to save as many corals as possible and improve the chances that affected sections of reef can recover.


Two urgent efforts are happening at the same time, Moore said:

Scientific teams are collecting small fragments from genetically unique corals and storing them on land in gene banks, which is critical to prevent any losses of genetic diversity.

They are also rescuing healthy coral stock, which can be used to make more coral or be planted onto damaged reefs, from areas that are too hot and moving the pieces to facilities on land or into deeper, cooler water to wait out the heat wave.

Moore added that experts are also developing plans to safeguard corals that are still in the water. Some potential interventions, she said, include shading nurseries or high-value reef sites, and providing corals with more food through a process known as supplemental feeding.


Additionally, experts said it’s important to reduce or remove local stressors that can further place further strain on the reef, such as runoff from land and overfishing.

What happens next?
In the longer term, experts said this bleaching event can provide crucial lessons about protecting and restoring the reef.

“There’s a lot that we can learn,” Moore said. “We would never just keep doing the same thing and expect a different result.”

For instance, scientists may put a greater focus on breeding corals that are more resilient or resistant to heat or disease, she said. Other experts said there may be increased efforts to create more land-based nurseries.

But restoring reefs alone won’t be enough. Drastic cuts to climate-warming emissions are needed. Not only does the buildup of carbon dioxide warm the atmosphere, but it also makes oceans more acidic and less hospitable for many marine animals.

According to one forecast, climate change may wipe out almost every coral reef habitat on Earth by the end of the century.

“Coral restoration is a critical part of the solution, but it’s not the whole solution,” Grainger said. “The solution needs to be action on climate change.”
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Taxslave2

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,019
3,806
113
Edmonton
Ottawa closing Arctic weather stations despite climate change: Memo
Both automated and manual weather stations have seen a decrease

Author of the article:postmedia News
Published Aug 08, 2023 • Last updated 1 day ago • 1 minute read
An Environment Department memo says the feds closed Arctic weather stations even as catastrophic climate change was being warned of, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.
An Environment Department memo says the feds closed Arctic weather stations even as catastrophic climate change was being warned of, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.
An Environment Department memo says the feds closed Arctic weather stations even as catastrophic climate change was being warned of, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.


The memo, dated March 27, said automated weather stations in Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut had decreased from 73 to 69 since 2012.


“In terms of manual observations the Meteorological Service reached its peak in 1988 with 94 sites,” said the memo, adding that today there are 57.

“The decrease of manual observations over time is a worldwide phenomenon,” said the memo.

No reason was given for the closures.

The memo said there was an “urgent need for Canadian communities to adapt to this new reality” of climate change.

“Average temperatures in Canada are rising at twice the worldwide average with the North seeing increases up to three times this global rate,” said the memo.

“Indeed, extreme weather events experienced across Canada over the past several years have shown how climate change has already altered our reality and put the safety, security and economic prosperity of Canadians at risk.”

Parliament had voted to spend $384 million to modernize the Meteorological Service of Canada.

A 2022 audit found Environment Canada forecasts were accurate as little as 77% of the time.

Three-day forecasts were accurate about 87 % of the time, wrote auditors, and five-day forecasts were only 77% accurate.

The Meteorological Service dates from 1871 with forecasts drawn from radar installations, marine buoys, weather balloons, lightning sensors and land stations.
Why don't people get that climate has always changed? OMG seriously....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
This just in: It’s going to be cold and snowy in Canada this winter.

So says the Farmers’ Almanac, according to BlogTO, cruelly calling its winter forecast the “return of the BRRR.”

The good news, being that we’re still in the dog days of summer, is that winter doesn’t officially begin until Dec. 21 in theory…

The bad news is the almanac’s extended 2023-24 forecast says that Canada’s cold temperatures will make their unwelcome return on Dec. 1.


Western Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba can expect frigid temperatures, while Newfoundland and Labrador will be cold but not nearly as bad as some other parts of the country.

For those dreaming of a white Christmas, the almanac says that areas around the Great Lakes are expected to get above-normal amounts of snow.

The forecast also says that southern Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic Canada could see possible snowstorms in March and the Prairies can expect heavy snow during the first week of February.

Of all provinces, British Columbia dodges the season’s typical chill, being the only province expected to see near-normal temperatures throughout the winter.

Still, both of Canada’s coasts will still get hit by precipitation.

The forecast says B.C. will get rain and snow with temperatures hovering around the freezing mark, while Quebec and the Maritimes could see a coastal storm during the second week of February followed by chilly air.
Soooo….normal.
 

harrylee

Man of Memes
Mar 22, 2019
3,415
4,602
113
Ontario
This just in: It’s going to be cold and snowy in Canada this winter.

So says the Farmers’ Almanac, according to BlogTO, cruelly calling its winter forecast the “return of the BRRR.”

The good news, being that we’re still in the dog days of summer, is that winter doesn’t officially begin until Dec. 21 in theory…

The bad news is the almanac’s extended 2023-24 forecast says that Canada’s cold temperatures will make their unwelcome return on Dec. 1.


Western Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba can expect frigid temperatures, while Newfoundland and Labrador will be cold but not nearly as bad as some other parts of the country.

For those dreaming of a white Christmas, the almanac says that areas around the Great Lakes are expected to get above-normal amounts of snow.

The forecast also says that southern Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic Canada could see possible snowstorms in March and the Prairies can expect heavy snow during the first week of February.

Of all provinces, British Columbia dodges the season’s typical chill, being the only province expected to see near-normal temperatures throughout the winter.

Still, both of Canada’s coasts will still get hit by precipitation.

The forecast says B.C. will get rain and snow with temperatures hovering around the freezing mark, while Quebec and the Maritimes could see a coastal storm during the second week of February followed by chilly air.
Soooo….normal.
But, but, but......Global warming.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
In March 2022, from its green perch high above us mere mortals, the federal government arbitrarily mandated a virtually unachievable net-zero national electricity grid by 2035, which will undermine electricity’s reliability and affordability and cost $54 billion, less hoped for future savings.

With last week’s release of draft Clean Electricity Regulations (CER), Steven Guilbeault, minister of environment and climate change, supported by Jonathan Wilkinson, minister of energy and natural resources, set a policy table groaning with threats and only a few inducements. They specifically decreed that no new unabated natural gas facilities should be commissioned after 2025, i.e. without carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), which will make the transition exceptionally difficult. The regulations reflect a government willing to fracture national unity, violate the constitutional division of powers, damage the economy and increase the cost of living of the public it was elected to serve.

“Powering Canada Forward,” a generally informative Natural Resources Canada memorandum released a couple of days before the regulations, occasionally dispenses with dispassionate analysis. Witness this beauty: “Volkswagen picked Canada over the United States because of our ‘high’ standards for environmental, social, and corporate governance.” Nary a mention of the $13 billion in government grants. (Shhhh….)

The two militant ministers would have us believe, as their backgrounder states, that “Climate scientists are unequivocally telling us that we must drastically reduce our emissions by 2030 and achieve net-zero by 2050 if we are to leave a habitable world to our children.” Wake-up call to true believers: Hundreds of prominent scientists deny — yes, deny — that a climate emergency exists, including most recently John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. President Obama’s undersecretary of energy for science, Steve Koonin, showed in his 2021 book that complex climate science is in fact, as its title says, Unsettled.

In a refreshing demonstration of common sense, Jim Skea, the new chair of the revered (by environmentalists) United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), recently told Der Spiegel that we should not “despair and fall into a state of shock … The world won’t end if it warms by more than 1.5 degrees.” He does not want people to give up on emissions reduction just because none of the world’s biggest emitters, including the G20, have met their Paris Agreement pledges. He also sensibly counsels that no scientist should tell people how to live or what to eat.

Yet here in the peaceable kingdom, battle lines are drawn for another political and constitutional crisis over energy. Saskatchewan and Alberta label federal policies an infringement of provincial jurisdiction and are prepared to go to court. Others may join in. The feds claim shared jurisdiction over environmental regulation and insist that non-compliance with the new regulations be punishable by fines up to $12 million and jail time up to three years. The threat of criminality demonstrates how far this government is prepared to go in tearing the country apart to avert a questionable global emergency that Canada can do almost nothing about and which can be addressed by significantly less costly mitigation measures and targeted R&D.

The rest at the above link.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
Ok let's get this straight. We are committing suicide because sunspots came back after a lack of them caused the coldest point in the past 13,000 years but now that they've came back with aggression 175 years later we are to believe the sun no longer warms the Earth and sunspots never did make climate variable on Earth but CO2 from coal does?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,235
12,774
113
Low Earth Orbit
Will electrifying cars and home heating break Canada's grid?

The government is encouraging Canadians to switch from gas to electric vehicles and from fossil fuel heating to electric heat pumps as part of Canada's plan to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

That's prompted a lot of Canadians, including CBC News readers, to ask: won't that break the grid? How will our electricity system handle that extra load? And will going electric raise energy bills for the average Canadian?

Here's a closer look.

The challenge for our grid
Earlier this month, when the federal government announced new regulations to get Canada's grid to net zero by 2035, it said its modelling shows more than $400 billion is needed to replace aging facilities and expand generation capacity in the country's electrical grid. Without such investments, the government suggests, Canada may be unable to respond to the pressure placed on the system from electric heating and cooling systems, electric vehicles and population and economic growth.

The good news is that many people, including the authors of the report, think it's achievable.

"Making electricity systems bigger, cleaner and smarter is technically and economically feasible," the report said.

We still have some time — so far
Francis Bradley, president and CEO of Electricity Canada, which represents electric utilities across Canada, said that's partly because electrification of transportation and home heating will be a gradual process, and government targets make the growth in demand somewhat predictable.

"We aren't going to go from no electric vehicles to only electric vehicles," he said. "And even in 2036, there's still going to be a lot of cars on the road that are not electric."

 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,140
9,550
113
Regina, Saskatchewan