The Liberals are currently punishing much of Canada outside of their voter base of Ottawa/Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver, but that’s a different divisive story I guess, in the places where public transportation is more of a concept than a reality due to population density and geography, so they must be punished accordingly.You have about 15% of Conservatives who are super racist but wealthy. They're the ones holding back the party. Otherwise this wouldn't even be a controversial decision.
The fact that they are rejecting a fiscal conservative just goes to show how far off the path these nutbars have strayed because all they care about is punishing the Liberals lol
It's worth a lot. In Canada we have a lot of politicians who see stirring the emotional pot as their path to office, and precious few willing to identify and work to correct issues that are important to a lot of voters. Two big examples are environmental responisibilty and inequality both social and economic. Just bring either of these into a conversation and the polarity sets in.He made it by focussing on business, the economy, taxes, and crime. He also made it by staying the hell away from MAGAhat culture-war issues.
Just a comparison, for whatever it may be worth.
They have the most gender balanced caucus ever . Of course the black face wearing leader hasn’t a racist bone in his body like most Quebecers .The Liberals are currently punishing much of Canada outside of their voter base of Ottawa/Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver, but that’s a different divisive story I guess, in the places where public transportation is more of a concept than a reality due to population density and geography, so they must be punished accordingly.
What percentage of Liberals are Super Racist but Wealthy (?) if you’re comparing apples to apples?
You are old enough to remember leaded gasoline , and it’s resulting air pollution . Our environmental standards have risen considerably in the last 50 years . There is no such thing as equality , one starts at the bottom , where you end is on you .It's worth a lot. In Canada we have a lot of politicians who see stirring the emotional pot as their path to office, and precious few willing to identify and work to correct issues that are important to a lot of voters. Two big examples are environmental responisibilty and inequality both social and economic. Just bring either of these into a conversation and the polarity sets in.
But has the rate of environmental abuse risen even faster ? Our mining industry is best described as a "prolific offender", blank cheques issued to the oil and gas sector as far as cleaning up the mess they leave in their wake, unsustainable logging practices, the list goes on.Our environmental standards have risen considerably in the last 50 years .
The deck is stacked against low income earners.There is no such thing as equality , one starts at the bottom , where you end is on you .
Maybe we should just send people straight from high school into the CEO chair . That way everyone can be a no income earner .But has the rate of environmental abuse risen even faster ? Our mining industry is best described as a "prolific offender", blank cheques issued to the oil and gas sector as far as cleaning up the mess they leave in their wake, unsustainable logging practices, the list goes on.
The deck is stacked against low income earners.
you have our vote.Today's announcement is I will be making an announcement on Sunday which will confirm what has been generally know for 2 weeks. More announcements to follow.
Access to post-secondary education is most definitely based on financial ability. Idealogically, access to post secondary education should be governed by aptitude and ability, not how think daddy's wallet is. Education is our future, it would be nice to be able to think that future decisions would be made by those best qualified to make them. I'm thinking a hugely expanded scholarship program for those who can't meet financial thresholds.Maybe we should just send people straight from high school into the CEO chair . That way everyone can be a no income earner .
Those forestry numbers are easily spun by producers and harvesters, much of them based on projections that stretch decades into the future. The current bottom line says we are harvesting at a faster rate than the forest is being replenished. Raw log exports continue to climb as jobs in the value-added forestry products sector continue to drop. The mining industry is a microcosm of our overall approach to environmentalism, "We just can't afford to do things properly".Our forestry practices are mostly sustainable , we are cutting third growth in most cases . Try opening a mine and jump through the environmental hoops .
Ya, unfortunately, a lot of politics is "emotional" - people need to get the emotion out of their choices and think things through i.e. do the research and investigate before making a decision. Emotional decisions are almost always wrong.It's worth a lot. In Canada we have a lot of politicians who see stirring the emotional pot as their path to office, and precious few willing to identify and work to correct issues that are important to a lot of voters. Two big examples are environmental responisibilty and inequality both social and economic. Just bring either of these into a conversation and the polarity sets in.
Man you are out of touch with today’s practices , a mining company can no longer afford not to do things properly . Any new project takes five years or so just to clear regulatory hurdles .There is no comparison between today and 50 years ago .Access to post-secondary education is most definitely based on financial ability. Idealogically, access to post secondary education should be governed by aptitude and ability, not how think daddy's wallet is. Education is our future, it would be nice to be able to think that future decisions would be made by those best qualified to make them. I'm thinking a hugely expanded scholarship program for those who can't meet financial thresholds.
Those forestry numbers are easily spun by producers and harvesters, much of them based on projections that stretch decades into the future. The current bottom line says we are harvesting at a faster rate than the forest is being replenished. Raw log exports continue to climb as jobs in the value-added forestry products sector continue to drop. The mining industry is a microcosm of our overall approach to environmentalism, "We just can't afford to do things properly".
Nice hair though .Ya, unfortunately, a lot of politics is "emotional" - people need to get the emotion out of their choices and think things through i.e. do the research and investigate before making a decision. Emotional decisions are almost always wrong.