Yup we should have never merged Reform with the remains of the Conservative Party . Big mistake letting them swallow the movement .Eastern Tories.
Yup we should have never merged Reform with the remains of the Conservative Party . Big mistake letting them swallow the movement .Eastern Tories.
Most likely. But I doubt he would get the support of the Tory party. They are in a catch-22 scenario. They want to be right leaning but they can't win with that leader. Harper was successful because he was able to virtually ignore the social conservatives in his party. Nobody since has been able to do that. Until they solve this catch-22 we are stuck with TrueDope.If that is indeed the reality, don't that make Charest the best choice for Tories?
And those ideological differences remain to this day, and the problem remains that none of the internal factions within the CPC have the strength to mount a challenge to Trudeau on their own. Look at the front runners for CPC leadership right now, you've got Charest going the moderate route, Lewis going the social conservative route, and Poiliever on the far right, each with their own flavour of conservatism to peddle. For each new vote these contenders attract they risk alienating two others. This has been the way of things for a while within the CPC, and voters outside the party may just see any temporary internal truce as nothing more than an election ploy, which would be correct. There is precious little common ground within the party other than "get Trudeau!".Yup we should have never merged Reform with the remains of the Conservative Party . Big mistake letting them swallow the movement .
Lewis is the logical choice.And those ideological differences remain to this day, and the problem remains that none of the internal factions within the CPC have the strength to mount a challenge to Trudeau on their own. Look at the front runners for CPC leadership right now, you've got Charest going the moderate route, Lewis going the social conservative route, and Poiliever on the far right, each with their own flavour of conservatism to peddle. For each new vote these contenders attract they risk alienating two others. This has been the way of things for a while within the CPC, and voters outside the party may just see any temporary internal truce as nothing more than an election ploy, which would be correct. There is precious little common ground within the party other than "get Trudeau!".
I'm good either way, but Lewis would defang the Liberal gaslightingLewis is the logical choice.
And those ideological differences remain to this day, and the problem remains that none of the internal factions within the CPC have the strength to mount a challenge to Trudeau on their own. Look at the front runners for CPC leadership right now, you've got Charest going the moderate route, Lewis going the social conservative route, and Poiliever on the far right, each with their own flavour of conservatism to peddle. For each new vote these contenders attract they risk alienating two others. This has been the way of things for a while within the CPC, and voters outside the party may just see any temporary internal truce as nothing more than an election ploy, which would be correct. There is precious little common ground within the party other than "get Trudeau!".
Here's a notion. . .
Is it possible that electing a "Liberal Lite" Tory would help smooth a path to a more Tory Tory? That's the promise.
Of course, the risk would be that the Tories could get locked into "Lib Lite."
Hard to pin the racist label on her . Maybe she will be called an Auntie Tom .Lewis is the logical choice.
You're right that I would likely never vote Conservative, but that doens't mean I can't see what their problems are. The CPC is a mish-mash of different political ideologies trying to show a united face to voters, and the voters they need to win haven't swallowed their shtick for the last two times at bat.Funny Nick Danger , Serryah and Mentalfloss telling conservatives who to nominate . None have ever voted for Conservatives , nor would they ever consider doing so . But they know what the Conservatives need to win .
You're right that I would likely never vote Conservative, but that doens't mean I can't see what their problems are. The CPC is a mish-mash of different political ideologies trying to show a united face to voters, and the voters they need to win haven't swallowed their shtick for the last two times at bat.
But that's a big part of their base, and they're really easy to fool. Just give them something to get mad at and they'll do exactly whatever you want.After the last election I pointed out that the only way the Cons will win is if they a)dump the extreme right wing of their party...
But that's a big part of their base, and they're really easy to fool. Just give them something to get mad at and they'll do exactly whatever you want.
Hard to swallow the shtick when the leader changes direction like the wind , last weeks talking points no longer apply . If we want liberal we will vote liberal . When I say we I haven’t voted Conservative since Harper .You're right that I would likely never vote Conservative, but that doens't mean I can't see what their problems are. The CPC is a mish-mash of different political ideologies trying to show a united face to voters, and the voters they need to win haven't swallowed their shtick for the last two times at bat.
I thought the extreme right all followed Bernier out the door .Andrew Scheer was far from extreme . O’Toole was almost to the left of Trudeau , and Harper had a majority and enacted no extreme right legislation . Didn’t even touch the abortion issue . Unlike Trudeau he believed in your body your choice .After the last election I pointed out that the only way the Cons will win is if they a)dump the extreme right wing of their party and b) actually start listening to people about what they really want to see in their leadership.
And if b leads to an extremist right wing leadership then they will never win, because the rest of Canada won't tolerate their BS.
You ain’t going anywhere trying to out liberal the Liberals .If that was a big part of the conservative base then Maxime Bernier would be leader of the conservative party. The fact is we have elected more centrist leaders rather than right wing leaders the last 2 times. Problem was scheer was not vetted properly and O'Toole couldn't stop himself from flip flopping if his life depended on it.
As a whole, Canada is more centrist than left or right wing. We need a party to fill that gap, and if there was a party to do that it would win handily against trudeaus liberals. The Liberal Party used to be that party. That is untill trudeau got his grubby hands on it. So if the Libs are willing to forgo that position, then the cons should fill it.
What is right/center/left depends on where you are holding the dumb end of the tape. I still look at the Liberals as center, and the Conservatives and NDP as right and left respectively.The fact is we have elected more centrist leaders rather than right wing leaders the last 2 times.
That's the way it used to be, and even the the cons were not that far off center.What is right/center/left depends on where you are holding the dumb end of the tape. I still look at the Liberals as center, and the Conservatives and NDP as right and left respectively.
What other seem to miss is that the last few elections the conservatives have consistently gotten more votes than the liberals (in a one person one vote sorta thing) or any other single party in Canada, but come up with way less seats, ‘cuz that’s just the way it is.What Cons seem to miss most of the time is that while even Libs might be okay with fiscal Conservativism, they REALLY want Liberal social views. I think there's a belief that Libs are more 'right giving' and Cons are 'right taking' and until they somehow fix that appearance, you won't get a Conservative Government.