Again LOLing at you're language channer incel.Go f*ck yourself you hypocritical c*nt face.
Using kids is wrong, both sides pull this crap though.
It's funny because it's true.
- Thread starter Tygerbright
- Start date
Using kids is wrong, both sides pull this crap though.
Awww the poor deluded snowflake thinks I frequent 4 chan/kiwifarms/reddit because I grew up in a small northern mining town. Never been on them, don't associate with extremists on EITHER side. Don't support their "causes" either. Too bad you can't say the same. I've also been married for 14 years now. When's the last time you got laid without having to pay for it?
I notice you didn't have a problem with the language on the signs but have a problem with my language. Yep, you just keep on proving what a hypocritical piece of shit you are. It's inevitable with ALT-left trash.
Looks very racist to me.Go f*ck yourself you hypocritical c*nt face.
So when does the right to free speech impose on someone else's right to personal safety? Or is yet another double standard thingy with one rule for fascists and one rule for taxpaying citizens?
Do you mean when does free speech become policy which leads to "imposing on personal safety"?
LOL again the Alt-left can't exist and doesn't it's not a bestowed naming.
But your repeat on this for the 3rd/4th time shows my judgement is spot on.
And I never mentioned your background, it has no relevance.
I go by your language use, your content.
Yes literally they invented both.
I tried explaining actual reality to the Fckwitt but he is as smart as the 4channer he speaks.
It's not a "bestowed" naming. :lol: :lol: :lol: The ALT-left DOES exist. Do I have to ask you again wtf you think the likes of the NDP, social democrats, antifa, etc are? OH that's right, you think they're moderates because you're an extremist f*cktard who thinks left-wing extremism is Centrism.
Again you're willfully ignorant.
The alt-right named and created itself.
The left did no such thing.
That's literally it, the only truth, end of debate.
It does indeed. Let's define it.
I'll start. The alt-left, as opposed to the left, is characterised by the following positions:
1. Identifying people by the groups to which they belong, as assigned by the alt-left (e.g., Black, White, women, trans, FN (Native), etc.
2. Opposition to financial reward for producing substantial financial gain. Strong tendency toward "equalizing outcomes."
3. Support of "equalizing" laws based on government-mandated special treatment of the groups to which one is assigned and the past treatment of those groups (obviously, emphasizing the disadvantages of those groups).
4. Confidence in and support of government regulation and intrusion at all levels, provided it is in service of alt-left goals.
5. Equal or more equal distribution of resources, untethered from one's role in producing those resources (i.e., money).
6. Government control of the distribution of resources.
7. Use of government power to suppress "undesirable" ideas.
8. Presentation of the following characteristics as inherently evil: Caucasian, Christian, male, heterosexual, above-median family income.
Anything else?
NB: I'll be happy to work with anybody who wants to develop a consensus definition of the "alt-right" as wel.
Like Trudeau having little old ladies whisked away by the rack-em-ups during town halls because they dared question his reckless immigration policy? For sure.
Or threatening church members for going to church while encouraging the leftists to mass protest and engage in mass violence? For sure.
Wait, is going to church a 1st Amendment thing? Or is that a different right the leftists are stomping all over?
Let me correct that - "Those parents are just as horrible as the racists & fukheads on the left". There, I fixed it for you.