One, I have read the notes of the call (it's not technically a transcript)
And two, blah, blah on the rest of your paranoid BS.
Is there any normal person posting on here that you approve of?
One, I have read the notes of the call (it's not technically a transcript)
And two, blah, blah on the rest of your paranoid BS.
Do you still get it? Did they paper the walls of your asylum with it back in the forties?You read Der Sturmer?
![]()
figures.
Nazis will Natt I guess.
I certainly approve of her but alas, you are too stunned a bunny for my Warren.Is there any normal person posting on here that you approve of?![]()
Several people can corroborate what Trump said on the phone to Sondland, so its a bit more than hearsay, but you'll continue to ignore that.Oh? would hearsay be allowed in a court of law? How about in the Senate trial? Hint it is a no on both counts
Moosie doesn't answer questions unless he's been pre-loaded with the answer by Fox.I asked you for an unbiased source to get information.
That doesn't answer my question.
He doesn't know what hearsay is. Nor did he know until I told him that the Federal Rules of Evidence contain 23 exceptions to the hearsay rule.Several people can corroborate what Trump said on the phone to Sondland, so its a bit more than hearsay, but you'll continue to ignore that.
Hey did you catch the clip of Joe Biden bragging about withholding aid to Ukraine until the prosecutor got fired ? What are your thoughts on this matter ?He doesn't know what hearsay is. Nor did he know until I told him that the Federal Rules of Evidence contain 23 exceptions to the hearsay rule.
It's like "due process" and other pseudo-legal terms that the ignorant (of all political stripes) throw around without the faintest f*cking idea what they're talking about.
I certainly approve of her but.
Ummm you are the one who tacitly admitted to reading it. I mean Jebus doood, how the hell else would you know what's in it?Do you still get it? Did they paper the walls of your asylum with it back in the forties?
I wonder what Rudy has to say about it.Hey did you catch the clip of Joe Biden bragging about withholding aid to Ukraine until the prosecutor got fired ? What are your thoughts on this matter ?
Sondland did not say there was a quid pro quo.The way I see it, now that Sondland said there was "quid pro quo", one or all the other 3 immediates to Trump, Bolton, Giuliani, or Mulvaney, tie Trump to the rails or he ties one or all of them to the rails. Not much choice. I bet it's the former. But I still don't think this will end in impeachment because Trump has too many loyalists in the Senate willing to ditch the country to favour Trump.
Would LOVE to know what that insurance is..I wonder what Rudy has to say about it.
Rudy has "insurance" ...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...biden-documents-to-be-released-if-i-disappear
https://af11.wordpress.com/2019/11/...quid-pro-quo-in-impeachment-inquiry-the-view/Sondland did not say there was a quid pro quo.