Trump World -USA-2019
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
So what would one call the collective of England, Scotland, N. Ireland, Wales and the Isle of Man.
Yep for the most part but there is the odd exception like Jim Pattison who over the years has donated $millions for the benefit of his fellow man! Andrew Carnegie was another one.
Last edited:
the news today in Trump land is that his young attractive "assistant" (perhaps an Epstein find?) is fired for revealing that Trump doesn't want his picture taken with Tiffany (who is apparently his daughter) because she's fat.
President Game Host Host is really delivering the laughs
President Game Host Host is really delivering the laughs
Twitter won’t autoban neo-Nazis because the filters may ban GOP politicians
Is booting neo-Nazis from Twitter a simple process? Probably not. Can steps be taken at the very least to punish racist tweets? Probably, but not everyone will be happy with whose hate speech gets scrubbed as a result.
With a user base of 321 million monthly tweeters — a few millions less than the total US population — the micro-blogging site could help minimize the rapid spread of digital hate speech in the country if they helped silence racist and xenophobic tweets. Turns out one Twitter employee couldn’t help but wonder why they don’t take action.
During an all-hands staff meeting on March 22nd, an employee asked why the company refrains from using its AI to kick white nationalists off the site. After all, Twitter had previously ushered a sweep of bans on accounts pushing Islamic State propaganda. The answer was unsurprising for anyone who’s ever perused Twitter: Content filters created to identify hate speech could potentially result in Republican politicians being banned, an executive explained.
Motherboard broke down the executive’s explanation of the algorithm process:
With every sort of content filter, there is a tradeoff, [the executive] explained. When a platform aggressively enforces against ISIS content, for instance, it can also flag innocent accounts as well, such as Arabic language broadcasters. Society, in general, accepts the benefit of banning ISIS for inconveniencing some others, he said.
In separate discussions verified by Motherboard, that employee said Twitter hasn’t taken the same aggressive approach to white supremacist content because the collateral accounts that are impacted can, in some instances, be Republican politicians.
More: https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/twitter-won-t-autoban-neo-193850606.html
Probably block most of Adolf Drumpf's tweet too.
Is booting neo-Nazis from Twitter a simple process? Probably not. Can steps be taken at the very least to punish racist tweets? Probably, but not everyone will be happy with whose hate speech gets scrubbed as a result.
With a user base of 321 million monthly tweeters — a few millions less than the total US population — the micro-blogging site could help minimize the rapid spread of digital hate speech in the country if they helped silence racist and xenophobic tweets. Turns out one Twitter employee couldn’t help but wonder why they don’t take action.
During an all-hands staff meeting on March 22nd, an employee asked why the company refrains from using its AI to kick white nationalists off the site. After all, Twitter had previously ushered a sweep of bans on accounts pushing Islamic State propaganda. The answer was unsurprising for anyone who’s ever perused Twitter: Content filters created to identify hate speech could potentially result in Republican politicians being banned, an executive explained.
Motherboard broke down the executive’s explanation of the algorithm process:
With every sort of content filter, there is a tradeoff, [the executive] explained. When a platform aggressively enforces against ISIS content, for instance, it can also flag innocent accounts as well, such as Arabic language broadcasters. Society, in general, accepts the benefit of banning ISIS for inconveniencing some others, he said.
In separate discussions verified by Motherboard, that employee said Twitter hasn’t taken the same aggressive approach to white supremacist content because the collateral accounts that are impacted can, in some instances, be Republican politicians.
More: https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/twitter-won-t-autoban-neo-193850606.html
Probably block most of Adolf Drumpf's tweet too.
Last edited: