Julian Assange in custody.
- Thread starter Hoid
- Start date
Who's Worse—Julian Assange or the New York Times and Washington Post?
https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/whos-worse-julian-assange-or-the-ny-times-and-washington-post/
Assange is as left and as guilty as the NYT or Wapo.
Do you have a link to 'the good old days' they miss so much? For Iran that would be 1953-1979, for Cuba the decade before Fidel. Something similar for the country in question.
Nobody has suggested exile to the KSA. They know how to take care of squealers, . . . I mean 'a hero' of course.
And they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went and they went.
By what occurred in London today we lay witness to the onset & possibility of freedom of the press being grounded permanently (in effect rendered dead) world reach wide by the dictate of a lawless USA government & it's much over extended reach! A rogue governments blatant & open warfare on freedom of the press! - James Buik
Canada has extraterritoriality laws too. For example, if a person is accused of molesting a child abroad, he can be tried in canada under Canadian law. Inasmuch as I think that person should be punished, I do have a problem with that principle. In a strictly legal sense, how can Canadian law apply to a Canadian abroad? I could support a UN law against child molestation for example. This would make all UN-memebr-states one jurisdiction in the application of that law. It would make sense for a Canadian court for enfore UN laws even when violated beyond Canada's borders. I could also see Canada encouraging other states to toughen their child-molestation laws and extradite an accused to the country of the alleged crime to stand trial. But I've always struggled to understand the rationale behind extraterritoriality laws.
Toronto does not apply its laws to Ottawa. Ontario does not apply its laws to Quebec. So why should Canada apply its laws to other states?
While in custody he can become Julie Assange and start over and earn movie and book royalties like Chelsea.
Because our government sold us out decades ago. Can't remember the name at the moment (Larson?)but there is a guy in Vancouver was selling pot seeds over the net and was given up to the US by our government because the seeds were being bought in the US.