Shootings at 2 New Zealand Mosques
- Thread starter MHz
- Start date
So where is the gnashing of teeth and tearing of garments over the terrorist attach by a Muslim on a tram in Utrecht this morning, killing 3.
Oh, excuse me. As Justin has stated in the past this was an act by a victim of our racist White, Christian male society and therefor one that has mitigating and understandable circumstances. Unlike those of White Nationalists whose acts are aggravated by pure, unmitigated, bigotry and criminal cultural culpability. :roll:
Oh, excuse me. As Justin has stated in the past this was an act by a victim of our racist White, Christian male society and therefor one that has mitigating and understandable circumstances. Unlike those of White Nationalists whose acts are aggravated by pure, unmitigated, bigotry and criminal cultural culpability. :roll:
Last edited:
Are you saying that the attack in Christchurch was not a terrorist attack but the one in Utrecht was?
Where do you get that. I'm simply stating that different standards are being applied in how these crimes are being portrayed in the mainstream media. One that conforms to the current zeitgeist of a deep antipathy to Western, Christian, industrial, scientific, (real) family oriented society. That which now dominates liberal opinion standards in the West.
Last edited:
Don't be so lazy. Do your own gnashing, though I imagine in your case, "gumming" might be a more appropriate term.
Yeah. You know what I don't get?
We had a guy here in Canada that stabbed to death another man he picked up, filmed the butchery, posted it to the net, and mailed various body parts around the country, then fled to Germany. He was arrested, and returned, and it was TWO YEARS before he went to trial.
Why?
It is amazing that Scheer is condemned for not identifying the attackers as white supremacists and calling for the elimination of that despicable ideology, while in the aftermath of an Islamic terror attack our media refuses to call it Islamic terror, and a call to eliminate the ideology responsible would land you in deep hot water.
That said, murder is inexcusable on any level, and we should expect our political leaders to condemn such acts.
That said, murder is inexcusable on any level, and we should expect our political leaders to condemn such acts.
LOL, poor hoid - never right...because he is left...
Here please allow me to remove my boots from your ass...I'll need them to go walking in the snow of global warming ya cowardly ch*cknsh*t racist fruitbait.
... I know exactly who is to blame, and for what, cupcake.
YOU are a known liar and genocidal fakenews is the crime.
happy now?
Say, where is your condemnation when Palestinian (Muslim and Christian ) children get slaughtered from behind a wall egg boi?
Last edited:
OMG! :lol: :lol: :lol: Oh I can read, you still can't do numbers worth a shit though. The poll CLEARLY shows that 58% SUPPORT THE RETURN of the death penalty. That leaves 42% against it. You see, 100 - 58 = 42. That kind of basic subtraction is something they probably should have covered when you were in Grade 1 or 2.
Now, when the option of life in prison (real life sentence, not that 25 years out in 16 or less bullshit) is presented, the numbers are 50/50. Half still want to see the death penalty while the other half prefer life sentences. Which again lays bare your bullshit assfact that the majority do NOT want to see a return of the death penalty.
Calling me a white natty doesn't change the fact that you are stupid, wrong and quite willing to double and triple down on your stupidity. Your ALT-left masters have taught you well, I'll give you that much. Too bad they didn't actually teach you anything worthwhile.