Really .Part of learning from the errors of the past is admitting them. Kavanaugh has steadily denied. So if he made "errors" in the past, he is now lying under oath.
Just what we want in a Supreme Court justice!
Really .Part of learning from the errors of the past is admitting them. Kavanaugh has steadily denied. So if he made "errors" in the past, he is now lying under oath.
Just what we want in a Supreme Court justice!
Progs be thugs.Ted Cruz run out of DC restaurant by protesters shouting ‘We believe survivors!’
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/te...ieve-survivors/?utm_source=push_notifications
Things could get rather testy.........
... or maybe you're wrong because you don't have any better quality information at hand than the rest of us have, despite what you might believe about yourself.
Unh hunh. Snotty rich kid ... that's a good one.I have no pretense that i know any more than anyone else. I do feel free however to possess and express a point of view.
But you sound a lot like one of those snotty rich kids, sequestered in their sense of superiority and entitlement, that i mentioned in my post.
Trump seems to know a whole lot of poisonous people.Report Finds Judge Kavanaugh Ruled Against Public Interest in Almost All of His District Court Cases
Even as records about Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s time in the White House remain concealed, much can be learned from his judicial record. We speak with Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, about their analysis of Judge Kavanaugh’s opinions in split-decision cases, which found that during his 12 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh decided or wrote an opinion against the public interest 87 percent of the time in split-decision cases dealing with consumer, environmental and worker rights.
More: http://www.democracynow.org/2018/9/5/report_finds_judge_kavanaugh_ruled_against
Exactly why he is the GOP consensus pickReport Finds Judge Kavanaugh Ruled Against Public Interest in Almost All of His District Court Cases
Even as records about Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s time in the White House remain concealed, much can be learned from his judicial record. We speak with Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, about their analysis of Judge Kavanaugh’s opinions in split-decision cases, which found that during his 12 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh decided or wrote an opinion against the public interest 87 percent of the time in split-decision cases dealing with consumer, environmental and worker rights.
More: http://www.democracynow.org/2018/9/5/report_finds_judge_kavanaugh_ruled_against
Yup. And considering you're Canadian, I'm still not seeing that you have a legitimate interest.Really .
I have noticed that the media only seems to talk about the judges views or his history concerning cultural issues such as abortion and racism. But, the Republican party is the "Corporate Party" and there has to be a reason why the Rich Folks are financing the Republican Party choice for the Supreme Court. Does anybody know his views on anything regarding business regulations and the like?