Our cooling world

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,015
13,455
113
Low Earth Orbit
I guess you missed the posts by the CC doughheads who predicted fewer hurricanes this year.
Yeah I posted a NASA article saying hurricane season wouldn't be as harsh thanks lower than average temperatures in the Atlantic. It was you or bluebyrd who claimed it was lower because sea ice melting.

I have no idea how one of you two morons tied sea ice to the West Coast of Africa where hurricanes start forming but boy was it ever worth a hard laugh.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Yeah I posted a NASA article saying hurricane season wouldn't be as harsh thanks lower than average temperatures in the Atlantic. It was you or bluebyrd who claimed it was lower because sea ice melting.

I have no idea how one of you two morons tied sea ice to the West Coast of Africa where hurricanes start forming but boy was it ever worth a hard laugh.


Yup.


Super Typhoon Mangkhut makes landfall in the Philippines


https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/14/asia/super-typhoon-mangkhut-ompong-wxc-intl/index.html
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
We were discussing Atlantic hurricanes and you bring up Pacific typhoons.
Are you really that stupid?
Yeah, how stoopid can you get. The Atlantic Ocean is completely separate from the Pacific Ocean. They have nothing in common other than the same atmosphere and water circulating around the globe.

No relation.

Disconnected.

El Nino is fake news.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Big oil asks government to protect its Texas facilities from climate change

PORT ARTHUR, Texas -- As the nation plans new defenses against the more powerful storms and higher tides expected from climate change, one project stands out: an ambitious proposal to build a nearly 60-mile "spine" of concrete seawalls, earthen barriers, floating gates and steel levees on the Texas Gulf Coast.
Like other oceanfront projects, this one would protect homes, delicate ecosystems and vital infrastructure, but it also has another priority: to shield some of the crown jewels of the petroleum industry, which is blamed for contributing to global warming and now wants the federal government to build safeguards against the consequences of it.
The plan is focused on a stretch of coastline that runs from the Louisiana border to industrial enclaves south of Houston that are home to one of the world's largest concentrations of petrochemical facilities, including most of Texas' 30 refineries, which represent 30 percent of the nation's refining capacity.
Texas is seeking at least $12 billion for the full coastal spine, with nearly all of it coming from public funds. Last month, the government fast-tracked an initial $3.9 billion for three separate, smaller storm barrier projects that would specifically protect oil facilities.
That followed Hurricane Harvey, which roared ashore last Aug. 25 and swamped Houston and parts of the coast, temporarily knocking out a quarter of the area's oil refining capacity and causing average gasoline prices to jump 28 cents a gallon nationwide. Many Republicans argue that the Texas oil projects belong at the top of Washington's spending list.



http://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-protect-oil-facilities-from-climate-change-coastal-spine/


hahahaha!
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Big oil asks government to protect its Texas facilities from climate change
PORT ARTHUR, Texas -- As the nation plans new defenses against the more powerful storms and higher tides expected from climate change, one project stands out: an ambitious proposal to build a nearly 60-mile "spine" of concrete seawalls, earthen barriers, floating gates and steel levees on the Texas Gulf Coast.
Like other oceanfront projects, this one would protect homes, delicate ecosystems and vital infrastructure, but it also has another priority: to shield some of the crown jewels of the petroleum industry, which is blamed for contributing to global warming and now wants the federal government to build safeguards against the consequences of it.
The plan is focused on a stretch of coastline that runs from the Louisiana border to industrial enclaves south of Houston that are home to one of the world's largest concentrations of petrochemical facilities, including most of Texas' 30 refineries, which represent 30 percent of the nation's refining capacity.
Texas is seeking at least $12 billion for the full coastal spine, with nearly all of it coming from public funds. Last month, the government fast-tracked an initial $3.9 billion for three separate, smaller storm barrier projects that would specifically protect oil facilities.
That followed Hurricane Harvey, which roared ashore last Aug. 25 and swamped Houston and parts of the coast, temporarily knocking out a quarter of the area's oil refining capacity and causing average gasoline prices to jump 28 cents a gallon nationwide. Many Republicans argue that the Texas oil projects belong at the top of Washington's spending list.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-protect-oil-facilities-from-climate-change-coastal-spine/
hahahaha!
No! No! No! Cannot be!

Random Internet Climate, Geology, Sonar Imaging and Arctic Navigation Expert has declared it into be impossible from out in Action Central Saskatchewan where they have their fingers on the pulse of the planet.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
We were discussing Atlantic hurricanes and you bring up Pacific typhoons.

Are you really that stupid?


No, we were discussing intense low pressure systems, also know as tropical cyclones, hurricanes, and typhoons. It is all the same weather disturbance. I'd explain further, but I doubt you have the intelligence to understand it.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,878
122
63
No, we were discussing intense low pressure systems, also know as tropical cyclones, hurricanes, and typhoons. It is all the same weather disturbance. I'd explain further, but I doubt you have the intelligence to understand it.
Ad hominem is a poor argument.