That's what all the racists say. Unfortunately, they all want their snootful from the trough and can't explain who's going to pay for it.
That's what all the racists say
Canada needs a new northern coast to coast rail line for mass immigration and agricul
- Thread starter French Patriot
- Start date
That's what all the racists say. Unfortunately, they all want their snootful from the trough and can't explain who's going to pay for it.
That's what all the racists say
What's wrong with it? We have about 1/4 of the arable land and half of the rest of it is climatically impossible! Any more stupid questions?
And they might tell you to go to Edmonton, or Vernon!
A population of nine hundred, and we spend over a million bucks per family to build a road there. Absolutely ridiculous. We could give each family a million bucks and have them move south.
Not losers like you, welfare-boy. And not your fellow immigrant losers working as security guards and pushing brooms.
The constitution will not allow any interference in where people want to live. And the idea you're going to take a bunch of immigrants from the desert and tropical lands and get them to live in the north is preposterous.
This is not going to happen, a decade from now, 45 degress and north will grow snow ten months outta twelve untill about 2030 when the freeze peaks a couple of decades later grass will appear in Regina again maybe. An ice road is not out of the question however.
Last edited:
We did. That is so 19th century.
Land is prvincial jurisdiction so not all were the same.
Farming pays, it does not cost. and ghettos we would have regardless of where we put immigrants.
Regards
DL
But ghettos in other countries are not our problem.
Farming does not pay well. Lots of hard work too so good luck getting millinials to do it.
Farming does not pay well. Lots of hard work too so good luck getting millinials to do it.
Thanks for confirming what I said. Government control. Not Canadian Native control.
If it was Native control, non-natives would be on worthless reserves where we have put our native.
Non-Canadians Natives would be ghettoised and not our hosts.
Regards
DL
Ask a homeless man if he will work hard for his hungry children. If he says no, he does not belong in Canada.
If he will not farm to feed his family, we do not want his ilk infesting Canada.
Regards
DL
You best read some of the decisions regarding native jurisdiction over crown land. If it is in their traditional area they have Pretty much total control over what happens. Litterly billions of $$$$ of economic opportunity have been lost because some tribe refused to sign off on the project.
The traditional area of our Native Canadians, who are North American Indians, is all of north America and basically the rest of the world.
Their tradition was that no one owned the land. That notion came from outside of native tradition.
Regards
DL
I agree. We have forgotten our fiduciary responsibilities to our Canadian natives, --- if we ever actually meant to live to our treaty obligations that is.
Regards
DL
Grain producing pays great and it's not hard work any longer. It's just super expensive to start from scratch.
It's from 1970 but I do not believe it has been voided.
https://www.motherearthnews.com/homesteading-and-livestock/alberta-canada-zmaz70sozgoe
No your contention is absolutely ridiculous. People are only one thing served by the road. It's an access to resources. It's access to a huge geographical entity like the 4th largest ocean in the world, not to mention a huge potential for population growth on the MacKenzie delta, not to mention access to Russia, Norway, Finland and Sweden. It will likely become a huge port for shipping oil to Russia. The possibilities are unlimited! There, I've just tripled your knowledge of geography!
Not unless they are willing to pay for it.
Another questionable statement! We already have lots of people "south", we don't want more down there where it's already overly congested. We want to move people to the wide open spaces where resources are abundant.
But it prevents hunger!
Not when economy of scale is applied and the government pays for it instead of Canadian tax payers paying welfare and have people sit on their rumps instead of working a profitable farm.
Regards
DL