I did, yes. But I prefer the real text. Wanna know why, exactly?Actually, "supreme" and "paramount" are synonyms.
But you knew that.
Because the Fifth Amendment says ". . . nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."
And our clever Supreme Court in Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954) decided that "public purpose" and "public use" were synonyms, which led to seizure of private property for "urban renewal." This thread of reasoning has continued, and eroded property rights more and more, through Kelo v. New London, 545 U.S. 269 (2005), when the Supremes held that the fact that a new owner of the property (a developer) would produce more tax revenue for the city than the multi-generational homes that stood on the property was sufficient "public purpose" to condemn and confiscate those homes and the land.