Collusion

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,433
9,582
113
Washington DC
For anyone who actually might be interested in the law, it is illegal for a foreigner to give anything of value to a political campaign: cash, property, information, "opposition research," etc.

It is also illegal for an American to conspire to have a foreigner give anything of value to a political campaign.

Whether or not that happened is a matter for the legal system to decide. But that's the legal basis of this whole flap.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Well it is a good thing this lawyer didn't approach the Clintons...she'd be dead already.

*snicker*
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83


In private, Donald Trump rages as Russia scandal deepens - Macleans.ca
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
For anyone who actually might be interested in the law, it is illegal for a foreigner to give anything of value to a political campaign: cash, property, information, "opposition research," etc.

It is also illegal for an American to conspire to have a foreigner give anything of value to a political campaign.

Whether or not that happened is a matter for the legal system to decide. But that's the legal basis of this whole flap.



and this was all reported many times, but some insist they don't know what the actual problem is.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yes, I will always defend you and your friends.

ah how cute
the left behind projecting again...as you are famous for

I am against the deepstate pedos YOU support as all our posts clearly state.
No getting around that FACT bub.

For anyone who actually might be interested in the law, it is illegal for a foreigner to give anything of value to a political campaign: cash, property, information, "opposition research," etc.

It is also illegal for an American to conspire to have a foreigner give anything of value to a political campaign.

Whether or not that happened is a matter for the legal system to decide. But that's the legal basis of this whole flap.

But first they actually have to commit the crime.
Oh well, CNN needs the ratings to beat reruns of yogi bear.

So what happened to all hillary's FAKE CHARITY donors..they seemed to have abandoned her after she didn't get elected.
Imagine that eh?

"Clinton’s fallout is interestingly causing an internal revolution among Hillary’s big donors. At her New York bash to “thank” her big donors of $1 million or more, she took no blame and pointed the finger at Comey and Putin.

Her spin did not work and she has lost a lot of credibility according to confidential sources. They were smart enough to realize that even if Russia “hacked” the DNC and Podesta emails, there would be no release if there had been no wrongdoing to begin with.

Now Clinton’s biggest backers want a “campaign autopsy,” which could expose Clinton’s entire operation. The donors are demanding to know where Clinton spent the near $1.5 billion in campaign resources she collected in the closing months. They want the receipts.
They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

The donors are not buying the Russian hack story. Putin isn’t the only explanation for her failure and they are now pointing the finger at Hillary. She never bothered to go to Wisconsin. The story running behind the curtain is that fundraisers are cutting off all donations to the Democratic Party until this honest review is carried out. They do not want to hear about Comey and Putin.

Foreign governments have been cutting off funds to the Clinton Foundation. At last, the money is being cut off.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/...e-hillary-spent-1-5-billion-for-her-campaign/

Well, ain't that a giant something (poop?) burger.
 
Last edited:

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
This is all a tempest in a teacup, stirred up by CNN and the Liberal Media Establishment. There is not a iota of substance to it. There was NO collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

Trump won the election because of a revolt by the American electorate against the failed political paradigm of Free Markets (free trade, monetarism, deregulation, privatization), the Cult of Death (abortion, homosexuality, euthenasia) and American global imperialism (its goal is corporate loot, not installing American 'democracy').

It has led to deindustrialization, polarization of wealth, eradication of the middle class, regressive taxation, cultural dissolution and abasement of the national identity. It's been a disaster and Hillary was at the beck and call of the ruling, debauched oligarchs who imposed it. That's why she lost.

CNN views this as Watergate, but Donald Trump is not Richard Nixon. Nixon was always snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. He was always placing himself in what appeared to be the political centre. He doubled down on losing propositions from his winnings and ALWAYS lost in the end. Trump has always snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. He never chooses the centre, taking the unconventional and marginal positions, which he intuits as an authentic, viable future. And he ALWAYS wins.

The American public is not listening to this. And by and large they will migrate to Trump, in the face of the lies and moral dissolution of the Democrats and the media.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
ah how cute
the left behind projecting again...as you are famous for

I am against the deepstate pedos YOU support as all our posts clearly state.
No getting around that FACT bub.



You certainly are in favor of random accusations against fellow forum members, based on nothing other than your own mental problems.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
It's amazing how much bullshit Danbones can stuff into one post.

He must be getting paid.

George Soros pays him in tinfoil reichsmarks.

For anyone who actually might be interested in the law, it is illegal for a foreigner to give anything of value to a political campaign: cash, property, information, "opposition research," etc.

It is also illegal for an American to conspire to have a foreigner give anything of value to a political campaign.

Whether or not that happened is a matter for the legal system to decide. But that's the legal basis of this whole flap.

And it's only connected to Donald Trump's son. And his son-in-law... and his campaign manager at the time. And also Trump kinda mentioned it during a campaign speech, so he probably knew but that's unprovable. If you put the pieces together, it's all very obvious that Trump colluded with the Russians in the campaign, he has close ties to Russian corruption and money laundering and that the Russians find him and his family easy marks.

Trump suckered voters and Putin suckered Trump. You're a nation of saps.

You really don't understand at all, do you?

I don't know. I'm pretty sure this is all about a forgotten article from January about Hillary Clinton that no one gave a **** about until now. I mean yes, it's a desperate attempt to distract, and yes Hillary Clinton isn't relevant and wasn't in January, and yes it has nothing to do with this, but it totally has everything to do with this. Can't you see? HILLARY CLINTON! CNN! GEORGE SOROS!
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
This is all a tempest in a teacup, stirred up by CNN and the Liberal Media Establishment. There is not a iota of substance to it. There was NO collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

Trump won the election because of a revolt by the American electorate against the failed political paradigm of Free Markets (free trade, monetarism, deregulation, privatization), the Cult of Death (abortion, homosexuality, euthenasia) and American global imperialism (its goal is corporate loot, not installing American 'democracy').

It has led to deindustrialization, polarization of wealth, eradication of the middle class, regressive taxation, cultural dissolution and abasement of the national identity. It's been a disaster and Hillary was at the beck and call of the ruling, debauched oligarchs who imposed it. That's why she lost.

CNN views this as Watergate, but Donald Trump is not Richard Nixon. Nixon was always snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. He was always placing himself in what appeared to be the political centre. He doubled down on losing propositions from his winnings and ALWAYS lost in the end. Trump has always snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. He never chooses the centre, taking the unconventional and marginal positions, which he intuits as an authentic, viable future. And he ALWAYS wins.

The American public is not listening to this. And by and large they will migrate to Trump, in the face of the lies and moral dissolution of the Democrats and the media.

You are very enthused by Trump perhaps? I know many people arround me are as well. It appears to me that a messianic figure is being cultivated in preparation of some necessary event that will require a level of blind obediance to the dictates of said messianic figure in some earth shaking movement like GRAND MAGA WAR to strike off the remaining chains of common decency and sence and finally impose the absolute eden of globalism. As powerfull as he my become in life he should imagine his weight from the afterlife when the as yet unpublished Book of Trump could rule the messmerized led by a swaggering chubby priesthood of loud braggards cutting deals like multiplying loaves and fishes out of the remnants of irradiated pastures and seas. He's a jumbo bag of bullshjt.