F*cking AWESOME album and just as relevant today as when it was produced, if not more so.
All suicidal explosions are triggered by Zionists of Tel Aviv
- Thread starter selfsame
- Start date
Be realistic. No sane person is going to give up eating pork simply for that sake of a new religion. On another note why isn't this post in Spirituality and Philosophy where I can happily ignore it?
Vaseline is a petroleum jelly-based product made from petroleum distillates. Quite frankly, I'd prefer if it was rendered pork fat.
When I finally stop eating pork I won't be eating anything else either because I'll be dead. Shellfish I get the restriction on. They're nasty filter feeders and don't sun dry for preservation. And I do understand the old restriction on pork, which made sense in the days before refrigeration. Unless you were having a pig roast with lots of guests, that meat was going to spoil pretty damn fast in the desert heat.
But as was mentioned above, thank the believers in "God" who invented refrigeration. Pizza would suck nard without real pepperoni (not that halal crap) or spicy Italian sausage and most importantly, bacon.
When God made the pig, he made natures most perfect food source for humans. Oh man, so many different flavours from one animal. Butt chops, roasts, bacon, Canadian bacon, peameal bacon, ham, sausage, pig jowls, pigs feet in red sauce and pork bellies which make bacon taste like nothing. :lol: In fact, pork bellies are far and away the best and most deliciously edible hunk of any animal on Earth. No bacon you've ever had in your life is as good as a fresh hunk of properly cooked, uncured, slab pork belly. The uncured, undried pork belly is like a hunk of tenderloin absolutely draped in rich, delicious pork fat. When rescued fresh from the clutches of the cynical bacon-makers and prepared carefully, it is the best thing to eat on the entire earth, and a proud use of our thoughtful, "filthy", farmyard friend's best physical attribute. You'll probably end up paying about $15-$20/lb for it but trust me, it's absolutely be worth it.
Absolute best pork I ever had was when we turned three sows loose in the forest for a year and then shot them. Pure organic pork. Never tasted anything like it. My wife made head cheese out of them too; food of the gods. JLM would have creamed his jeans.
Yes, and pork bellies to be specific.
I get my meat from my brother-in law's farm. He only raises a handful of cattle and pigs at a time and you have to buy in when he purchases the animals. But the cattle is all pasture fed and the meat is nicely marbled without being overly fatty and his pigs are scrumpdillyicious. I just wish we lived closer to him because he also raises chickens and I really miss farm fresh eggs. The ones in the grocery store are not very good by comparison.
On religious grounds I agree with you but on scientific grounds there may be sounder reason to abstain from the delightfully tasty very close relative of human/mixed origin.
The Hybrid Hypothesis
A new theory of human origins Human origins: The other parent
EUGENE M. MCCARTHY, PHD GENETICS
Rationally, Darwin's theory is not correct .. but because atheists like it, and they defend it with enthusiasm which in fact is not the scientific way of thinking.
No objective evidence to it; nothing but only postulation and imagination; why do you insist on it as if it is a revelation?
While for this hypothesis of hybrid .. it more alien and weird.
Nothing to prove it but only the wishful thinking.
A hint which may be correct: the chromosomes may be nearer than other animals (and actually it is far and so far from human.)
This similarity may agree with the explanation that the swines may have been created from the bodies of some idolaters and disobedient people whose disobedience exceeded the bound and provoked the wrath of God.
This is not related only to the disobedient Children of Israel in the time of Nabuchodonosor, but to other religious sects like in India who give much respect to rats: so rats climb on them and on their heads and they are glad of this believing they are their ancestor incarnation: which may indicate that such rats might have been created from the corpses of the dead idolaters.
Thank you for the update. It works too good on natural leather to be a petroleum product was my downfall on that one. (that and a lot of people getting a shiver in their spine if they have ever used it as a sexual lubricant. That would make a lot of people pig-f*ckers IMO
Is there a reason you feel it necessary to prove how stupid you are multiple times every day?
I don't believe Darwin. We have much in common with pigs though, including the taste according to those who have eaten members of the tribe on the other side of the valley. Whatever conclusion we reach with repect to human origins it will be sure to displease many of us . I find it kind of flattering that I may taste good.
Wow! That was so scientific! I am in awe of your wisdom ... Jayzus Christoph. That was so dumb that I wonder if perhaps you were an idolater in your past life or did your mother drop you on your head at birth?
Actually I suspect it never made sense, not when you consider the fact that pork was eaten in other tropical and semi-tropical cultures. If they could eat pigs in Indonesia then they could eat them anywhere.
Take my advice. Confine your posts to the Spirituality and Philosophy section of CC where nutty statements are accepted as the norm.
I just finished a bit of research on it. It seems that pigs were a major food source in the Middle East until around 1000 B.C.E. IT would seem that chickens, and probably greater desertification, are the "culprit".
Chickens have several advantages over pigs. First, they are a more efficient source of protein than pigs; chickens require 3,500 litres of water to produce one kilo of meat, pigs require 6,000. Secondly, chickens produce eggs, an important secondary product which pigs do not offer. Third, chickens are much smaller and can thus be consumed within 24 hours; this eliminates the problem of preserving large quantities of meat in a hot climate. Finally, chickens could be used by nomads. While neither chickens nor pigs can be herded in the same way as cattle, chickens are small enough to be transported.
Read more: People Ate Pork in the Middle East Until 1,000 B.C.
And since pigs and chickens require pretty much the same kind of resources, why keep both when one is quite a bit more efficient than the other. So it appears that pork consumption was already on the decline long before any of the "holy" books were written. Evidence suggests it began in Egypt. Although there is still pig husbandry in the region in some of the woodland and marsh areas where resources are abundant enough to keep both pigs and chickens satisfied. As for tropical and sub-tropical countries, the first pigs evolved in south-east Asia. Tropical and sub-tropical countries are custom made for wild boars and sows. And in those countries, a boar was more likely used as part of a village feast as opposed to feeding a single family back then. They were doing the same thing throughout Europe until they figured out that salt could cure meat.
Has anybody tried pork jerky? The best method to store any food is dehydration as it preserves all the nutrients.
I had a pork stir fry this evening, with onions, carrots, mushrooms, broccoli, corn and red pepper. The pork was so tender and juicy. I bet Selfie would have drooled and then felt guilty and dirty. Poor sap don't know what he is missing.
I had a pork stir fry this evening, with onions, carrots, mushrooms, broccoli, corn and red pepper. The pork was so tender and juicy. I bet Selfie would have drooled and then felt guilty and dirty. Poor sap don't know what he is missing.