Kind of interesting watching the religious scrambling to divert attention by trying to discredit other for not believing. A sure sign that the article struck a nerve, one that is actually unsure of itself. It reminds me of the time I was sitting in the Halcyon hot springs when a tourist asked me what was in the water that was so relaxing. I said Lithium. He asked what it was used for. I said "to calm down schizophrenics and bi-polar people. He immediately said, "I'm OK!" rather nervous like. In my mind I said, "Ya riiight!"
the vastness of your intolerance is a sure sign that you are completely indoctrinated.
Only name of disliked poster's ideology is acceptable and only name of disliked poster will sit in judgement and approve accepted thought.
.... I hear that's the way that cults operate
well regardless, it's a very good thing that the brain is plastic.
The vastness of your intolerance is a sure sign that you are completely indoctrinated.
Only Cliffy's ideology is acceptable and only Cliffy will sit in judgement and approve accepted thought.
.... I hear that's the way that cults operate
Plastic means pliable/flexible/adaptable and yes, shit is plastic.Shit, I thought it was organics...
Just being you deserves consolation.I demand a consolation prize
Wrong. And since you claim to be a scientist, you don't even get a consolation prize.How are things down at Caesar & Caesar?
A "Theory" is a combination of one or more basic hypotheses, plus a body of knowledge about what the hypotheses imply and how they interrelate to each other, which can together (allegedly) explain many things. Examples: "Evolutionary theory", "Quantum theory", "Marxist theory". A theory may be true or false, correct or incorrect. A biologist teaching "evolutionary theory" believes that the theory is true, while a physicist teaching "19th-century aether theory" believes that the theory is false.
A "Law" is usually more specific, something that can be summarized in a sentence or an equation, like "Newton's law of gravity". A law may be true or false. For example, Newton's law of gravity is false (strictly speaking).
So, these words are not usually used in science to express relative degrees of confidence. Instead, if you want to express confidence, you would use other words, like "fact" or "true" for something you're very confident in, or "hypothesis" or "working hypothesis" or "belief" or "guess" otherwise.
Now here is an observation that tends to affirm the study's findings.================================================================
One of my colleagues said to me once: "See that one [another colleague] whose name is so and so; he is trivial: he is without principle!" [although he has good manners.]
I cannot imagine one without faith or belief .. truly he is trivial: how can anyone without a belief, and when he reaches to the correct belief, he should be firm in his belief.
This is the way of Prophet Abraham and the believers together with him.
http://quran-ayat.com/pret/6.htm#a6_161
<quran-ayat.com/pret/6.htm#a6_161>
Fixed it back.
Thanks though
.... Juice box?
Now here is an observation that tends to affirm the study's findings.
what ever flavor, just don't heat it up in the ...ah never mind
![]()
it better not be kool aid...,.,
Communion wine?
Only in the United Church ...
I don't participate in cannibalistic rituals, but thanks anyways!
Why not the real thing?
You can eat the bravery of your adversary and make it your own.
I became a lot more inquisitive and also organised after that Census taker.