That's not what the 6 o'clock news was reporting tonight. But then you just pay attention to the "news" you want to hear!
The First 100 Days in Trump Land
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
That's not what the 6 o'clock news was reporting tonight. But then you just pay attention to the "news" you want to hear!
Funny how that goes around comes around works eh! Always many ways to justify changing the rules until they backfire , whaaaa .
How come those poor babies were lined up nice and neatly with brand new plush dolls beside each ? And who took the time to line them up ? Why ?
Is there anything you won't criticise him for . Will changing water into wine be enough or do you demand 4 miracles ?
The U.N. O.K. right .
Well. Let's see now. .......
He can cheat and lie with a certain panache.
With his warmongering it is a good bet his approval ratings will soon be going upwards because delusional right wingers love war and war profits.
I'm just watching for Anal Floss and Cannucklehead to each have a cerebral hemorrahage!
Do you call it "warmongering" when you finally start to fight back after the chemical warfare begins..........? I don't think so!
There is no proof and there is no motive for the Syrians to use chemical weapons, but there is motive for the US backed terrorists (so called rebels) fighting the Syrian army. Especially since the US supplied them with the sarin gas in the first place. Assad is not the terrorist, the Americans are. The 6 o'clock news is bought and paid for by the military/industrial complex. If you like feeding on their BS propaganda, you should invest in a crate full of Pepto Bismol.
Did you listen to 10 AM C.B.C. news, Cliffy? It was Sudan forces that did the gassing, f.a. to do with the Yanks, so you can put one more theory to rest along with your 9/11 conspiracy theory. Enjoy your day!
Oooooooooooh oooh , mea Culpa..........................SYRIAN forces. God damn Alzheimer's.
I'm beginning to realize that God damn Facebook is a good place to stay the hell away from! Too much idle chatter!
Folks can piss and moan as much as they like, in adoration or hatred of whomever they adore or hate. Bottom line:
Punishing regimes that use chemical weapons is a good thing.
Punishing regimes that use chemical weapons is a good thing.
You're exagerating.
I hope you have a gas mask TB cuz you just woke up a Karma dragon.
bloody good question. Someone did some clever staging. Which in itself is just sick. and makes things suspect.
there is something weird about the whole thing. The chem attack and the US military response.
One thing that is not surprising is that Trump made a pretty much independent decision. NO consent or consciousness from Congress. He "informed" them. From what I understand.......this is not protocol. There was NO MAD rush for the military action. Burt Trump wanted to do the surprise thing. But he gave it away with his comments about not revealing what he would do. He should have said Nothing......... but he blabs about not blabbing
It seems that wisdom dictates : one should be cautious before taking anything from the Trump regime at face value.
Would venture that the action taken was at least impart from the position of self interest. (as in Trump interest.)
Trump is being selective in responding to the so called Chem attack. ( where no one know exactly who did it and the investigation is not complete ) while being very tolerant of the humongous number and variety of war horrors to humanity taking place.
Punishing regimes that threaten to use nuclear weapons on you while they test-fire missiles in your direction is also a good idea. There is no point in America paying any more blackmail danegeld to comrade Kim, as it clearly doesn't work to do so.
It's several orders of magnitude of difficulty and danger above a cruise missile strike, though.
Yeah, it sure seems like it sometimes, but there will always be those who will hijack threads.
And what has Trudeau's humanitarian actions done to reduce the violence in the Middle East? He's a puppet and a high paid one at that!
Wouldn't it be better to have the actions to be taken for different situations planned ahead of time rather than run to Congress after the sh*t hits the fan?
Of course. Or going to congress "after the fact" just to inform them.
protocols are in place for a reason....and make the difference between orderly procedures and chaos. or going off half cocked alone. the consequences could be extreme Actions could have the flavor of being reactive and not that well thought out.
A Psychological profile of Prez Trump
A Psychological Portrait of President Trump | By César Chelala | Common Dreams
Might be interesting to see a psych profile of those that voted for him.;-)
Might not be as complicated or confusing as one may think. Trump never was the ideal candidate, but the people had to pick between him and Hillary. In my estimation with Hillary things would go on exactly the same, nothing would improve. A lot of people believed Trump could effect change and to be quite honest I'm one of them. If I was him I wouldn't use some of the vernacular he uses publicly and I might be a little more retrospect as far as personal opinions are concerned, but regardless of all that he has the potential to be a far better president than Clinton. That's the bottom line!
