CIA Concludes Russia Influenced Election to Help Trump Win: Source

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek




 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
poor frustrated cucks. :lol:



The Obama-Nation™ prefers controversy, rather than acknowledge the DNC had a failed candidate, with failed foreign policy, failed ethics and and failed platform.

Demonstrable corruption through the Clinton Foundation and setting the Middle East on fire through support of destabilization efforts in Libya and Syria only speak to the military industrial complex.

Making the Russians the 'everlasting bogeyman' is disingenuous at best for this failed Nobel Peace Prize winner.

Hitler Learns Aleppo is Liberated


All the hullabaloo about the source of the emails is a diversion from the main point - the corruption and manipulation that were revealed in the emails. It does not matter who obtained them or how (good on Steyn for referencing puzzygate"); what matters is the true, substantiated information they brought to light.

True and substantiated. Unlike the current rhetoric from Obama. This may be the scariest moment since the fool was elected. Will he risk war with Russia just to get his way... to bar Trump or extend his own miserable reign? How small is he?
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
"By contrast, Obama knew that American democracy was being subverted but uttered not a peep - and, indeed, assured us all that subverting US elections was impossible. "There is no serious person out there who would suggest that you could even rig America's elections," he said all the way back on October 18th. Less than two months later, we learn that every serious person in Washington spent October advising the President that the elections were being rigged.


Is Democrat Whiplash covered by Obamacare?"



you're getting nowhere cuck. :lol:

Donald J. Trump Verified account ‏@realDonaldTrump

Are we talking about the same cyberattack where it was revealed that head of the DNC illegally gave Hillary the questions to the debate?

Ann Coulter Verified account ‏@AnnCoulter

Two sources claim it was Sanders-supporting Dems who leaked to Wikileaks not Russia. So it was communists who leaked, not former communists.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
...or making it look like the airliners caused the twin towers to fall when we all know the Joos brought them down with demolition companies owned and staffed with Joos.

Time to hide under the stairs. The lunatics have escaped from the assylum, again.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC


Considering that the US has tampered and interfered with elections in just about every country on the planet, I find this approach rather hypocritical at best. There is no empirical proof Russia did anything of the sort but this whining sounds just like sour grapes to most of the rest of the world. It looks like the Dems are not willing to take responsibility for their own actions. Although I hope beyond hope that Trump doesn't get by the electoral college, I can't see how they can endorse Hillary either. This election has been absurd from the start. But it did wake up a lot of people to the fact that elections have been rigged for ever and now everybody should be aware that the system needs to be changed. The constitution was written to protect the rich. It never was about representing the people. It never was a democracy. Trump's rise to power has shown that the system is corrupt to the bone and if the Dems want to get any credibility back they would stop this stupid charade, accept responsibility for losing the election and fight to bring democracy to the country. Otherwise, stop their whining and let the people do the job for them.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,187
14,245
113
Low Earth Orbit
That's only fair. I would now like to quote from a Canadian Liberal PM, M. Jean Chretien. For the left wing crowd.
---

A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.

- Jean Chretien


So, what I'm taking away from Jean's statement is that you should have a proof. And you know when you have a proof when the proof is proven.

As he also said, "A proof is for the courts of laws..."

Once the evidence is evident, then they will investigate the proofs. Evidently.

Did he put da pepper on da plate when he ate da GST?