CIA Concludes Russia Influenced Election to Help Trump Win: Source
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
only in your own bean
3 Reasons Why The Latest Evidence In The Clinton Email Scandal Further Proves Her Guilt
...Recently released emails show that Hillary Rodham Clinton, and her top aides Cheryl Mills & Huma Abedin, were the original authors of classified material generated on unclassified computer systems that lacked the required security protections. (You can read the emails by going here and searching for “Hillary Clinton.”
They emailed it, forwarded it, and responded to it when they received it, over 1,600 times during Mrs. Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State in complete and total violation of U.S. law. It is that simple and the evidence is black and white, literally
3 Reasons Why The Latest Evidence In The Clinton Email Scandal Further Proves Her Guilt
but then dealing with reality is not on YOUR list of things to do today
3 Reasons Why The Latest Evidence In The Clinton Email Scandal Further Proves Her Guilt
...Recently released emails show that Hillary Rodham Clinton, and her top aides Cheryl Mills & Huma Abedin, were the original authors of classified material generated on unclassified computer systems that lacked the required security protections. (You can read the emails by going here and searching for “Hillary Clinton.”
They emailed it, forwarded it, and responded to it when they received it, over 1,600 times during Mrs. Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State in complete and total violation of U.S. law. It is that simple and the evidence is black and white, literally
3 Reasons Why The Latest Evidence In The Clinton Email Scandal Further Proves Her Guilt
but then dealing with reality is not on YOUR list of things to do today
Well it seems the evidence is conclusive. The Russians won the election and Putin will be the next president if Trump dosn't go to jail.
Your link is old news. The CIA and the FBI aren't concerned with the Clintons. Trump is now front and center. LOCK HIM UP!!!
The impeachment has begun!
McConnell, Ryan Back CIA After Trump Attacks Hacking Probe
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...ia-despite-trump-s-attacks-over-hacking-probe
McConnell, Ryan Back CIA After Trump Attacks Hacking Probe
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...ia-despite-trump-s-attacks-over-hacking-probe
Quotes
We do know this, however. A clique of American financiers not only helped establish Communism in Russia, but has striven mightily ever since to keep it alive. Ever since 1918 this clique has been engaged in transferring money and, probably more important, technical information, to the Soviet Union.
This is made abundantly clear in the three volume history Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by scholar Antony Sutton of Stanford University's Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace. Using, for the most part, official State Department documents, Sutton shows conclusively that virtually everything the Soviets possess has been acquired from the West.
It is not much of an exaggeration to say that the U.S.S.R. was made in the U.S.A. The landscape painters, unable to refute Sutton's monumental scholarship, simply paint him out of the picture. NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY by 1971 by Gary Allen
Cold War Hoax
waste of a good reddie there MF, I'll wager...
you lefties, eh?
We do know this, however. A clique of American financiers not only helped establish Communism in Russia, but has striven mightily ever since to keep it alive. Ever since 1918 this clique has been engaged in transferring money and, probably more important, technical information, to the Soviet Union.
This is made abundantly clear in the three volume history Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by scholar Antony Sutton of Stanford University's Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace. Using, for the most part, official State Department documents, Sutton shows conclusively that virtually everything the Soviets possess has been acquired from the West.
It is not much of an exaggeration to say that the U.S.S.R. was made in the U.S.A. The landscape painters, unable to refute Sutton's monumental scholarship, simply paint him out of the picture. NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY by 1971 by Gary Allen
Cold War Hoax
waste of a good reddie there MF, I'll wager...
you lefties, eh?
Hillary blaming her loss on the Russians is like an NFL team blaming the Zamboni operator for having lost the Stanley cup.
A Clinton Fan Manufactured Fake News That MSNBC Personalities Spread to Discredit WikiLeaks Docs
Bolton questions if Russian hacks were ‘false flag’
Bolton questions if Russian hacks were ‘false flag’ | TheHill
but anyway kids...
Paul Joseph Watson Verified account @PrisonPlanet
A list for those concerned about foreign involvement in the election.
Nice list/team of players.
This uproar about Russia is a tempest in a teapot. There were rumors, suspicions and speculation about Russia hacking the e-mails long before the election.
But it didn't matter then because it looked like Hillary was winning.
When Trump won it suddenly became important enough to get everybody in a frenzy.
So lets put the whole thing in context:
They say that they know Russia hacked the e-mails and gave them to Wikileak to release before the election. Suppose that is true. The fact is that those e-mails contained some damning evidence of skullduggery by the Democrats.
The message we should be getting now is that if the e-mails had not been hacked, the Democrat's skullduggery would not have become public so it would have been passed over as unimportant.
Now isn't that a great way to look at it? Dishonesty is dishonesty and hiding it from the public does not make it right.
This is nothing but a last ditch effort to place the blame for Hillary's loss somewhere and Russia is where it landed.
At this point in time it is a non-issue. What's done is done. It's a waste of time and resources to keep going over it.
They would do better to look for better ways to safeguard their computer systems in the future.
But it didn't matter then because it looked like Hillary was winning.
When Trump won it suddenly became important enough to get everybody in a frenzy.
So lets put the whole thing in context:
They say that they know Russia hacked the e-mails and gave them to Wikileak to release before the election. Suppose that is true. The fact is that those e-mails contained some damning evidence of skullduggery by the Democrats.
The message we should be getting now is that if the e-mails had not been hacked, the Democrat's skullduggery would not have become public so it would have been passed over as unimportant.
Now isn't that a great way to look at it? Dishonesty is dishonesty and hiding it from the public does not make it right.
This is nothing but a last ditch effort to place the blame for Hillary's loss somewhere and Russia is where it landed.
At this point in time it is a non-issue. What's done is done. It's a waste of time and resources to keep going over it.
They would do better to look for better ways to safeguard their computer systems in the future.
Not being from Ontario, did Rob go out of his way to pissoff the people he needed the help of?
Joe Walsh Puts Down His Musket to Bash Trump Over Russian Hacks - The Daily Beast
Trump supporters are now abandoning him
Trump supporters are now abandoning him
Yes I do believe there was hacking by the Russians. I have other questions though
why was there lousy security that allowed this to happen? How long did it go on for
before people found the problem in their system?
you know its one thing to complain but what was done to prevent it/
why was there lousy security that allowed this to happen? How long did it go on for
before people found the problem in their system?
you know its one thing to complain but what was done to prevent it/