You and the nut above this post.......C.I.A. Judgment on Russia Built on Swell of Evidence
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/1...evidence.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
same old melody different song
You and the nut above this post.......C.I.A. Judgment on Russia Built on Swell of Evidence
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/1...evidence.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
News flash simpletons...whether or not Trump benefited is not the issue. A foreign government took covert steps to try and interfere with the election. The fact that the Trumpites don't care, clearly shows the ends justify the means to them.
so how did this alleged 'hacking' (new trigger word) alter the election again? :lol:
Hillary blaming her loss on the Russians is like an NFL team blaming the Zamboni operator for having lost the Stanley Cup
Of course there's no new intelligence, the election happened already.
The election is over, Russians or no Russians. The fact that the US was powerless to stop them is a concern. But the best thing if one is concerned is a different administration than the one which allowed the influence to happen in the first place.
so how did this alleged 'hacking' (new trigger word) alter the election again? :lol:
Your analogy is good but don't you mean the NHL? NFL doesn't use a Zamboni.![]()
By releasing information that was harmful to Clinton and not Trump. The Russians also had a motive against Clinton since 2003.
And there is nothing 'alleged' about this.
It actually happened.
yeah...the opinion then, of the CIA, my young spastic friend, is just that, until proven otherwise.
Your post is the exact opposite of what Trump has said about the briefings. Goes to show how bad of a troll you really are. Please try to keep up. Don't forget that the CIA gets things wrong more than they get it right. Doesn't bode well for the future of said inteligence agency as far as their future is concerned.You're joking, of course. Putin wanted the weakest candidate to win and he got his wish. Unlike that last few presidents he will have little difficulty running rings around an inexperienced and ignorant clown like the Dumpster. After all, we are talking about a president-elect who is too lazy to attend intelligence briefings. How is he supposed to make an informed decision when he hasn't the faintest clue as to what is going on? It really appears more and more that the Dumpster is going to be little more than a figurehead president with the GOP establishment making most of the decisions for him. This, of course, is exactly the opposite of what the Dumpster promised when he said he was going to "drain the swamp."
The Clinton crime family was exposed long before that so why didn't America take them down in 1995 over this incident?By releasing information that was harmful to Clinton and not Trump. The Russians also had a motive against Clinton since 2003.
And there is nothing 'alleged' about this.
It actually happened.
Pros like in Saddam's WMD or that Iraq or Afghanistan had anything to do with 911? Kind of makes you wonder if those black prisons are training places for the next wave of bad guys that the CIA need in order to justify their existence.We should all accept the opinion of the tard that is Loc over the pros at the CIA
Tell that to the million or so civilians that have died due to the lies about OSB and Saddam being the arch villains of the US rather than it being and inside job by the CIA. The CIA is military not civilian and it is their task to keep the people safe and when they are the sponsors of terror on the same citizens they are supposed to be protecting.Yes, I believe in innocent until proven guilty. You believe guilt and innocence are contingent on political beliefs. Clearly, you're a moron
Nice to be welcomed where ever he goes. Does it bother you that you will never be invited to either of those places?