2016 Presidential Campaign

hillary rodham clinton vs donald john trump who will win?

  • hillary rodham clinton

    Votes: 12 40.0%
  • donald john trump

    Votes: 18 60.0%

  • Total voters
    30

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,816
469
83
You are a ****ing drooling moron and a troll. You wouldn't know a decent candidate if they kissed you on the lips. Your head is stuck up your **** too far.

Here is Hillary:

Rex Murphy: What kind of example is America setting? | National Post

Rex Murphy's a tool who works for the oil industry.

Tay posted an excellent clip of John Oliver who went through a comparison of both candidates and I've said all along that you may not agree with Hillary, but anything she's done wrong is fairly benign and Trump is without question, the most evil politician since WW2.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,816
469
83
Pitty because he will be missed while you..........well who cares.

He'd be missed as much as Blob Ford and Whodat when he finally croaks.

You would too if it was your money other people want to spend. Ever notice the ones pushing social programs are never the ones that pay the bill?

I have a secure, private industry job that pays decently well.

I'm neither well off nor poor and I've never once had to complain about taxes.

Only greedy, a$$hole conbots do that, which proves I am completely consistent about conbot politicians who care about money over people.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
I have a secure, private industry job that pays decently well.

I'm neither well off nor poor and I've never once had to complain about taxes.

Only greedy, a$$hole conbots do that, which proves I am completely consistent about conbot politicians who care about money over people.

So will you be writing a check or a letter?
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
Wrong. That's the standard in a court of law. What Trump has to do is win over voters. Which means he needs to prove whatever he needs to prove to do so.


The court of public opinion is no better than a lynch mob.. That's why there is a rule of law.
If anyone can make an accusation of wrongdoing without proof and put the onus on the victim to prove innocence it doesn't speak well for a society.
It is sad that so many people let their emotions decide guilt or innocence. I guess I'm strange, but I prefer to give the benefit of doubt when accusations are made without proof.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
The US just bombed Yemen, and no one's talking about it

What if the United States went to war and nobody here even noticed? The question is absurd, isn’t it? And yet, this almost perfectly describes what actually happened this past week.
While many Americans, myself included, were all hypnotized by the bizarre spectacle of the Republican nominee for president, a US navy destroyer fired a barrage of cruise missiles at three radar sites controlled by the rebel Houthi movement in Yemen. This attack marked the first time the US has fought the rebels directly in Yemen’s devastating civil war.
The Trump show has managed to bump all serious and necessary policy debates not just off the table but out of the room
The cruise missile salvo ramps up the already significant US military involvement in deeply divided and desperately poor Yemen. While it’s true that the US has launched drone strikes on al-Qaida targets in Yemen for years, sometimes killing civilians and even US citizens, this particular military engagement has the potential to drag the US straight into a protracted and escalating conflict. And, as everyone knows, America has an uncanny ability to enter protracted and escalating military conflicts.
Yet we’ve heard absolutely nothing about this from our presidential candidates.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/15/us-bombed-yemen-middle-east-conflict?CMP=fb_gu
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Fiscal conservatives are by nature douchebags because they care more about money than people.









 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
The US just bombed Yemen, and no one's talking about it

What if the United States went to war and nobody here even noticed? The question is absurd, isn’t it? And yet, this almost perfectly describes what actually happened this past week.
While many Americans, myself included, were all hypnotized by the bizarre spectacle of the Republican nominee for president, a US navy destroyer fired a barrage of cruise missiles at three radar sites controlled by the rebel Houthi movement in Yemen. This attack marked the first time the US has fought the rebels directly in Yemen’s devastating civil war.
The Trump show has managed to bump all serious and necessary policy debates not just off the table but out of the room
The cruise missile salvo ramps up the already significant US military involvement in deeply divided and desperately poor Yemen. While it’s true that the US has launched drone strikes on al-Qaida targets in Yemen for years, sometimes killing civilians and even US citizens, this particular military engagement has the potential to drag the US straight into a protracted and escalating conflict. And, as everyone knows, America has an uncanny ability to enter protracted and escalating military conflicts.
Yet we’ve heard absolutely nothing about this from our presidential candidates.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/15/us-bombed-yemen-middle-east-conflict?CMP=fb_gu
A good chunk of those associated with the 9/11 attackers were Yemenis, so it's karma, ain't it?


As the sign says, you've got to know your Yemeni.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Rex Murphy's a tool who works for the oil industry.

Tay posted an excellent clip of John Oliver who went through a comparison of both candidates and I've said all along that you may not agree with Hillary, but anything she's done wrong is fairly benign and Trump is without question, the most evil politician since WW2.

And here's the problem; I basically agree with you, and have said so. As bad as Hillary is, Trump would probably be worse.

But your attempt to whitewash the disgusting corruption of Clinton is way beyond the Pale, and your condescension to anyone that dares criticize your Precious is also beyond the Pale.

Your trolling is outrageous.

She is absolutely loathesome.

Just not quite as loathesome as Trump. We hope.


Mitt Romney was an extremely decent man.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
By rights nobody HAS to prove innocence. The onus is on the accuser to prove guilt.
All Trump ever had to do is say that it is not true. Those women must prove beyond a doubt that he is guilty or they are guilty of defamation of character. The fact that they waited until they thought it would influence the outcome of the election indicates malicious intent.
If they can't come up with credible eyewitnesses, Trump should sue their asses off.


It's hard to say for sure what did or didn't happen there. One possibility is a bunch of dumb Democrats (there's enough of them) that Hillary is paying!
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,816
469
83
And here's the problem; I basically agree with you, and have said so. As bad as Hillary is, Trump would probably be worse.

But your attempt to whitewash the disgusting corruption of Clinton is way beyond the Pale, and your condescension to anyone that dares criticize your Precious is also beyond the Pale.

Your trolling is outrageous.

She is absolutely loathesome.

Just not quite as loathesome as Trump. We hope.



Mitt Romney was an extremely decent man.

There's no whitewashing.

She's been absolved in every investigation.
 

davesmom

Council Member
Oct 11, 2015
2,084
0
36
Southern Ontario
It's hard to say for sure what did or didn't happen there. One possibility is a bunch of dumb Democrats (there's enough of them) that Hillary is paying!



It isn't hard for me to draw a conclusion. If one listens carefully to what they say, takes into consideration the timing, the demeanor with which they present themselves, all in all I don't believe a word they say.
Their stories just don't make sense.
It's a distinct possibility that those women heard the 'locker room talk' and thought, 'Hmmm, I could say he actually DID those things to me. I would get a lot of publicity and help Hillary get elected'.


This a very touchy subject to me for I know the destruction that can result from false accusations and women have ruined men's lives with their wild, unfounded claims and gotten away with it just because they are women.


It isn't that long ago that NDP women made accusations against Liberal M.P.s, remember? Those men never got the chance to face their accusers, present their side of the story, or defend themselves at all. The women were too cowardly to even reveal themselves to the public. Anyone who condones something like that and wastes any sympathy on those women isn't thinking very clearly imo.
I was neither for the NDP or the Liberals but I was totally disgusted by that whole situation and the unfair way in which it was dealt with.
 
Last edited: