The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything

[Blackleaf]

Probably the greatest cause of stress , which is the silent killer, is the existence of arrogant, loud mouthed, over bearing males who feel the need to control not only everything, but everyone as well. Not all males just the big mouth loudsters such as Trump and the like. Not all of us are like that. I think it's probably the minority. Remove them bastids and the primary cause of disease in this world, stress. would diminish considerably.

I think it's rather odd that you think all the world's problems are caused by "loud mouthed, over bearing males" like Donald Trump, someone who has made a rather reasonable comment about banning Muslims from Yankeeland, a comment that a lot more members of the public no doubt support than the PC Brigade would have us believe, yet you have no problem having some loudmouthed, foul harridan making a FAR WORSE comment in which she advocates the wholesale death and destruction of around 3.5 BILLION boys and men.

To be honest, the world won't be a far better place with less Donald Trumps. It'll be a far better place with less 22-year-old female criminology students.

Tell me, old chum, if this harridan gets her way and manages to get authorisation for the killing of 3.5 billion males, will you put yourself in the front of the queue?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

I think it's rather odd that you think all the world's problems are caused by "loud mouthed, over bearing males" like Donald Trump, someone who has made a rather reasonable comment about banning Muslims from Yankeeland, a comment that a lot more members of the public no doubt support than the PC Brigade would have us believe, yet you have no problem having some loudmouthed, foul harridan making a FAR WORSE comment in which she advocates the wholesale death and destruction of around 3.5 BILLION boys and men.

To be honest, the world won't be a far better place with less Donald Trumps. It'll be a far better place with less 22-year-old female criminology students.

Tell me, old chum, if this harridan gets her way and manages to get authorisation for the killing of 3.5 billion males, will you put yourself in the front of the queue?

Figured it wouldn't take you long to show up and start squealing, Princess.

Tell me, old chum, do you think the likelihood of her getting her way is high enough to be worth thinking about?

 

[Blackleaf]

Figured it wouldn't take you long to show up and start squealing, Princess.

Tell me, old chum, do you think the likelihood of her getting her way is high enough to be worth thinking about?

The likelihood of my getting my way if I said the global population of blacks, Muslims and females should be reduced by 90% in order to solve the world's troubles is very slim indeed, but I can just amount the amount of spittle-flecked anger and outrage and abuse I would receive from you and your friends if I'd said it.

Mr Trump is unlikely to get to carry out his great and reasonable policy of banning Muslims from America, but he was still met with a barrage of faux outrage and criticism from you and your friends here just by SAYING it, even though his comments (just banning Muslims from America, not killing them) were mild in comparison to Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student's comments advocating physically wiping out 3.5 billion humans.

The issue here is not whether Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student is likely to get her way, it's that she actually said it. Why's it one rule from Mr Trump and another for Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student?

 

[Ludlow]

The likelihood of my getting my way if I said the global population of blacks, Muslims and females should be reduced by 90% in order to solve the world's troubles is very slim indeed, but I can just amount the amount of spittle-flecked anger and outrage and abuse I would receive from you and your friends if I'd said it.

Mr Trump is unlikely to get to carry out his great and reasonable policy of banning Muslims from America, but he was still met with a barrage of faux outrage and criticism from you and your friends here just by SAYING it, even though his comments (just banning Muslims from America, not killing them) were mild in comparison to Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student's comments advocating physically wiping out 3.5 billion humans.

The issue here is not whether Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student is likely to get her way, it's that she actually said it. Why's it one rule from Mr Trump and another for Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student?

Freedom of speech. Ain't it a beech.

 

[Angstrom]

Freedom of speech. Ain't it a beech.

I love it.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

The likelihood of my getting my way if I said the global population of blacks, Muslims and females should be reduced by 90% in order to solve the world's troubles is very slim indeed, but I can just amount the amount of spittle-flecked anger and outrage and abuse I would receive from you and your friends if I'd said it.

Mr Trump is unlikely to get to carry out his great and reasonable policy of banning Muslims from America, but he was still met with a barrage of faux outrage and criticism from you and your friends here just by SAYING it, even though his comments (just banning Muslims from America, not killing them) were mild in comparison to Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student's comments advocating physically wiping out 3.5 billion humans.

The issue here is not whether Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student is likely to get her way, it's that she actually said it. Why's it one rule from Mr Trump and another for Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student?

Another complete failure to answer the question, followed by your fantasies and ranting like a brain-damaged baboon.

Well done, Princess. You're showing the quality of your mind here.

 

[Blackleaf]

Freedom of speech. Ain't it a beech.

It's funny how freedom of speech doesn't seem to apply to Mr Trump.

That's the thing about the Left - they seem to think freedom of speech should only extend to people who espouse views that they agree with.

 

[lone wolf]

Someone makes the title attractive

 

[Blackleaf]

Another complete failure to answer the question, followed by your fantasies and ranting like a brain-damaged baboon.

Well done, Princess. You're showing the quality of your mind here.

So Mr Trump is a racist buffoon for saying that all Muslims should be banned from America and he should not have said such a thing (even though I don't think he's advocated wiping out almost an entire group of people), yet it's okay for a little no-mark goody two shoes female criminology student to say that 90% of the entire world's male population should be wiped out?

A slight inconsistency and hypocrisy in the way you and you friends are thinking right now, is there not?

Tell me, Mr Tecumsehboner or whatever you are calling yourself these days, if Mrs Crimonology Student gets her wishes granted will you be putting yourself at the front of the queue for extermination?

 

[Kreskin]

The remaining 10% would enjoy having 90% of the competition removed.

 

[Twila]

I think it's rather odd

OF course you do. Given that thinking is not your strong suit.

The issue here is not whether Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student is likely to get her way, it's that she actually said it. Why's it one rule from Mr Trump and another for Little Miss Goody Two Shoes Criminology Student?

The rules are different for her because she is not pretending to be a politician. Also, if you'd had reading comprehension you'd have read that she'd originally written her idea as a vent. With the responses she'd received, she continued it on.

Just like what most here do with you. Wait for you to post something predictably stupid and inane and then make fun of you. But seriously, you don't have to worry about living in a land whereby you're only 10% of the population. You'd never make the cut.

The remaining 10% would enjoy having 90% of the competition removed.

Yep, and imagine the problems that would arise from having only that 10% to pick from. The choice would be sorely lacking and the population would decrease to dangerously low levels until a sickness came along and wiped out the rest of humanity. Or killed off most of the females and left a surplus of males around at which point repopulation would be in order and there'd be no gender specific birth policy anymore.vv

 

[Kreskin]

Ha ha Twila, that would be someone elses problem. In the meantime..

 

[EagleSmack]

The remaining 10% will spend their waking hours killing spiders.

There will absolutely be a huge boom in the house spider population.

 

[Blackleaf]

The rules are different for her

Also, if you'd had reading comprehension you'd have read that she'd originally written her idea as a vent. With the responses she'd received, she continued it on.

Stop making excuses for disgusting, abhorrent Hitleresque comments. There are none whatsoever.

 

[Twila]

Stop making excuses for disgusting, abhorrent Hitleresque comments. There are none whatsoever.

 

[Blackleaf]

Just imagine if a 22-year-old MALE criminology student came out advocating the wiping out of 90% of the FEMALE population of the planet. I'm almost certain that you, Tecumseh's Boner and the other Loony Tunes around here would have a very differing opinion of the comments. I can't see you being very accommodating towards such comments in that scenario.

I suppose, though, that in this day and age a woman can say whatever she likes and get away with it. That's the times we live in now.

 

[taxslave]

Obviously one frigid bitch.

 

[EagleSmack]

The sad part (sad in a funny way) is that the cute blonde manipulated the wallflowers again.

 

[Twila]

Stop making excuses for disgusting, abhorrent Hitleresque comments. There are none whatsoever.

You're lack of support for free speech, does not negate the right to free speech.

Just imagine if a 22-year-old MALE criminology student came out advocating the wiping out of 90% of the FEMALE population of the planet. I'm almost certain that you, Tecumseh's Boner and the other Loony Tunes around here would have a very differing opinion of the comments. I can't see you being very accommodating towards such comments in that scenario.

I suppose, though, that in this day and age a woman can say whatever she likes and get away with it. That's the times we live in now.

I don't have to imagine living in a world that's been run by males. I know how much it scares you to imagine a world run by women. It makes me smile..cause it's coming. hehehe.

 

[petros]

Ma nature would throw a bone into this plan right quick. The male birthrate would skyrocket to fill the gap. Nature is funny that way.